M. Qiu et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 47 (2012) 2437–2441
2441
possesses hierarchical pores with sizes mainly in the range of
2–50 nm and its BET surface area is 29.8 m2 gꢀ1. The surfactant
SDBS, C2O42ꢀ, and ultrasonic processing are found playing crucial
roles on the formation of the square-brick-like CuC2O4. This
morphology was well preserved after heating at 300 8C for 2 h
except that the surface roughness and aperture of the CuO became
larger due to release of gaseous CO2 and CO. This square-brick-like
CuC2O4 nanostructure may be produced through an oriented self-
assembly mechanism driven by induction force, orientation force
and dispersive force under ultrasound radiation in the case of
adsorption of the polar molecules SDBS on the CuC2O4 surfaces.
The as-prepared CuO has good light harvesting capability in UV–
visible region and can emit purple-blue light. The SPS result
demonstrates that it has rich surface state, which could enhance
the separation of the photogenerated electrons and holes.
Consequently it could increase the photocatalytic activity of
CuO. This porous square-brick-like CuO could be potential catalyst,
optics and gas sensor materials.
8
6
4
2
0
300
400
500
600
700
800
Wavelength (nm)
Fig. 7. Surface photovoltage spectrum (SPS) of the as-prepared CuO square bricks.
single abroad emission band centered at 400 nm, which indicates
that the CuO square bricks can emit purple-blue light. This is
different from the result by Aslani and Oroojpour where green-
yellow emission was observed [25]. This PL emission band could be
attributed to the near-band-edge emission of the absorption band
at low wavelength.
Acknowledgements
This work is financially supported by National Natural Science
Foundations of China (grant no. 20871091) and the Open Project of
Key Lab of Adv Energy Mat Chem (Nankai Univ) (KLAEMC-
OP201201).
The surface photovoltage method is a well-established con-
tactless and nondestructive technique for semiconductor charac-
terization based on analyzing illumination-induced changes in the
surface voltage [20,26,27]. It has a very high sensitivity (ca. 108q/
cm2) which exceeds that of conventional spectroscopies such as
XPS and Auger spectroscopies by many orders of magnitude. SPS
can provide information about the properties of the sample surface
layer (several atomic layers). SPS method has been proven to be
one of the most effective methods to reflect the separation and
recombination situation of photogenerated electrons and holes
[28]. The SPS response of the as-prepared CuO square bricks (Fig. 7)
includes two bands centered at 331 nm and 463 nm, respectively.
The band from 300 nm to 360 nm is attributed to band-to-band
transition (from valence band to conduction band of CuO). The
other response band between 360 nm and 800 nm could be caused
by surface states. Comparing with the SPS response at 360 nm, the
stronger signal at 463 nm suggests the existence of rich surface
states for this CuO sample. The photogenerated electrons could
transfer to the surface state, which would enhance the separation
of the photogenerated carriers and consequently the photocata-
lytic activity of CuO.
References
[1] W. Jia, E. Reitz, P. Shimpi, E.G. Rodriguez, P.X. Gao, Y. Lei, Mater. Res. Bull. 44
(2009) 1681–1686.
[2] S. Jammi, S. Sakthivel, L. Rout, T. Mukherjee, S. Mandal, R. Mitra, et al. J. Org. Chem.
74 (2009) 1971–1976.
[3] D. Shang, K. Yu, Y. Zhang, J. Xu, J. Wu, Y. Xu, et al. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 (2009)
4093–4096.
[4] F. Bakhtiari, E. Darezereshki, Mater. Lett. 65 (2011) 171–174.
[5] L. Zhu, Y. Chen, Y. Zheng, N. Li, J. Zhao, Y. Sun, Mater. Lett. 64 (2010) 976–979.
[6] Y. Mu, J. Yang, S. Han, H. Hou, Y. Fan, Mater. Lett. 64 (2010) 1287–1290.
[7] G.H. Du, G.V. Tendeloo, Chem. Phys. Lett. 393 (2004) 64–69.
[8] K.S. Jang, J.D. Kim, Langmuir 25 (2009) 6028–6031.
[9] Z. Liang, Y. Zhu, Chem. Lett. 33 (2004) 1314–1315.
[10] W. Zhang, X. Wen, S. Yang, Inorg. Chem. 42 (2003) 5005–5014.
[11] J. Xia, H. Li, Z. Luo, K. Wang, S. Yin, Y. Yan, Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 (2010) 1871–1877.
[12] M. Yang, J. He, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 355 (2011) 15–22.
[13] A. Aimable, A.T. Puentes, P. Bowen, Powder Technol. 208 (2011) 467–471.
[14] W.Z. Jia, E. Reitz, H. Sun, B.K. Li, H. Zhang, Y. Lei, J. Appl. Phys. 105 (2009) 064917-
1–064917-6.
[15] W.Z. Jia, E. Reitz, H. Sun, H. Zhang, Y. Lei, Mater. Lett. 63 (2009) 519–522.
[16] C.L. Zhu, C.N. Chen, L.Y. Hao, Y. Hu, Z.Y. Chen, Solid State Commun. 130 (2004)
681–686.
[17] L.Z. Zhang, J.C. Yu, A.W. Xu, Q. Li, K.W. Kwong, S.H. Yu, J. Cryst. Growth 266 (2004)
545–551.
[18] J.S. Xu, D.F. Xue, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005) 17157–17161.
[19] C. Xu, Y. Liu, G. Xu, G. Wang, Mater. Res. Bull. 37 (2002) 2365–2372.
[20] Y. Lin, D. Wang, Q. Zhao, M. Yang, Q. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004)
3202–3206.
4. Conclusions
[21] M.O. Coppens, J.H. Sun, T. Maschmeyer, Catal. Today 69 (2001) 331–335.
[22] W. Ho, J.C. Yu, S. Lee, Chem. Commun. 10 (2006) 1115–1117.
[23] T. Alammar, A. Birkner, A.V. Mudring, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2009) 2765–2768.
[24] L. Zhu, Y. Zheng, T. Hao, X. Shi, Y. Chen, J. Ou-Yang, Mater. Lett. 63 (2009)
2405–2408.
[25] A. Aslani, V. Oroojpour, Physica B 406 (2011) 144–149.
[26] H.C. Gatos, J. Lagowski, R. Banisch, Photogr. Sci. Eng. 26 (1982) 42–49.
[27] T.F. Xie, D.J. Wang, L.J. Zhu, T.J. Li, Y.J. Xu, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 70 (2001)
103–106.
Porous square-brick-like CuO nanostructures were quickly
prepared via CuC2O4 intermediate by assistance of ultrasound and
microwave processing, combining with thermal conversion reac-
tion. The pure monoclinic CuO has high crystallinity with an
average primary particle size of 12 nm. The CuO square bricks are
about 0.5–1
mm in width and 200 nm in thickness with slightly
convex surface in the middle of the square. The as-prepared CuO
[28] J. Zhu, X. Qian, J. Solid State Chem. 183 (2010) 1632–1639.