Yang et al.
Hydrogenation of 1-Nitroanthraquinone to 1-Aminoanthraquinone Catalyzed by Bimetallic CuPt Nanoparticles
x
pyrrolidone (PVP, K30), sodium hydroxide (96%),
anhydrous ethanol (>99.7%), 1-nitroanthraquinone
microscope (JSM-6010 PLUS/LA), operating at an accel-
erating voltage of 15 kV.
(
95%), 1-aminoanthraquinone (97%), and N ,N -dimethyl-
The X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of the sam-
ples were performed on a Thermo ESCALAB 250Xi
X-ray photoelectron spectrometer with monochrome
Al Kꢂ ꢅhꢆ = 1486ꢇ6 eV) as X-ray excitation source.
The XPS of the samples were calibrated by using Cls of
formamide (DMF, >99.5%) were of analytical reagent
grade and were purchased from Sinopharm Group Co. Ltd.
2
.2. Preparation of Bimetallic CuPt Nanoparticles
x
2
84.6 eV as the internal standard.
Inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (ICP) analyses
Bimetallic CuPt nanoparticles were prepared by the wet
x
chemical reduction method using hydrazine hydrate as
a reductant and PVP as an organic modifier. A typical
preparation procedure was described as follows. Firstly,
were performed using a VISTA–MPX instrument to ver-
ify the atomic ratio of Cu and Pt in the bimetallic CuPt
samples.
x
−
1
given amount of H PtCl ·6H O (0.0386 mol L ꢁ ethanol
2
6
2
solution and 26 mL of organic modifier (10 wt% of
Cu(NO ꢁ · 3H O) ethanol solution were mixed. Sixty
2.4. Evaluation of Catalytic Performance
3
2
2
−1
milliliters of copper nitrate (0.1667 mol L ꢁ ethanol solu-
Catalytic hydrogenation of 1-nitroanthraquinone with H2
was performed in a 500 mL stainless steel autoclave and
stirred with a magnetic driven stirrer. The autoclave was
charged with 3 g of 1-nitroanthraquinone in 150 mL of
tion was added into the above solution under stirring.
ꢀ
After the mixed solution was heated to 60 C, the pH
value of the solution was adjusted to 10 with a NaOH
−
1
(
1.0 mol L ꢁ ethanol solution. And then, 20 mL of
DMF solution and appointed amount of CuPt nanopar-
x
−1
hydrazine (7.5 mol L ꢁ ethanol solution was added drop-
wise at a rate of 1.2 mL min . The reduction reaction
lasted for 4 h with gentle stirring. The color of the reac-
tion solution became black, indicating that the Cu and
Pt were reduced to metallic Cu and Pt . The CuPt
ticles. The autoclave was purged with N2 for 10 min
to replace air inside. And then, pure H2 was pressur-
ized into the autoclave and the reaction solution was
heated to specified reaction temperatures. When the reac-
tion temperature reached the specified value, the stirring
rate was increased to 400 rpm. After reacting for a period
of time, the reaction was quenched by running cooling
water through a cooling coil in the autoclave. The products
−1
2
+
4
+
0
0
x
nanoparticles were cooled to room temperature, centrifu-
gated at 9000 rpm, and washed with anhydrous ethanol
for 6 times. The resultant bimetallic CuPt nanoparticles
x
were kept in anhydrous ethanol. TI hP e: 4a t6o . m1 4i c8 .r 1a t1i o5 . o8 f3 POt nt o: Fri, 17 May 2019 15:28:59
were analyzed using high performance liquid chromatogra-
phy (HPLC). A reverse-phase column (Innoval ASB C18,
Cu was changed by the volume of H PC t Co pl y·r 6i gH ht O: Ae mt h ea nr i oc la n Scientific Publishers
2
6
2
Delivered by Ingenta
solution.
5
mm, 4.6 mm×250 mm) and a UV detector (ꢃ = 254 nm)
For the purpose of comparison, monometallic Cu
nanoparticles and monometallic Pt nanoparticles were also
prepared according to the above-mentioned procedures.
ꢀ
were used for analysis at 30 C. A mixture of water and
methanol of chromatographic grade (v/v, 20/80) was used
−1
as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min . The con-
centrations of the products and 1-nitroanthraquinone were
analyzed by the external standard method.
2
.3. Characterization
The crystal phases of the as-prepared Cu, Pt, and CuPtx
nanoparticle samples were determined by X-ray powder
diffraction (XRD). The XRD spectra of the samples were
recorded on a diffractometer (D8 super speed Bruke-
3
. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3
.1. Chemical Structure and Composition
Analyses by XRD and ICP
The XRD patterns showed that the XRD peaks of the
AEX Company, Germany) using Cu Kꢂ radiation (ꢃ =
ꢀ
1
8
.54056 Å) at room temperature, scanning from 30 to
ꢀ
monometallic copper sample appeared at (2ꢄꢁ 43.3, 50.4,
5 (2ꢄꢁ.
ꢀ
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images are
and 74.0 , respectively, which were consistent with the
obtained using a microscope (JEM-2100) operated at an
acceleration voltage of 200 kV to characterize the mor-
phologies and particle sizes of the resultant nanoparticles.
TEM specimens were prepared by dropping ethanol sus-
pension of nanoparticle sample onto a copper grid. The
data used for calculating the particle sizes for each sample
were measured from the TEM images by counting at least
(111), (200), and (220) crystal planes of face-centered
cubic metallic copper (JCPDS 04-0836) (Fig. 1). The XRD
peaks of the monometallic platinum sample appeared at
39.7, 46.3, 67.5, and 81.2 , corresponding to the (111),
(200), (220), and (311) crystal planes of metallic platinum
(JCPDS 04-0802), respectively.
ꢀ
For the bimetallic CuPt samples, the XRD peaks of
x
1
00 individual particles. The average particle size of the
metallic copper were detected. However, no XRD peaks
of metallic platinum were found. It is possibly for the
reason that the amount of platinum was too small to be
detected by XRD technique and/or that platinum particles
with small sizes were well dispersed in the samples. Inter-
estingly, it was found that the XRD peaks of the metallic
metallic nanoparticles was calculated by a weighted aver-
age method based on the size of every individual counted
particle.
The EDX and EDS elemental mapping images of the
bimetallic samples were recorded on a scanning electron
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 19, 5906–5913, 2019
5907