2
88
M. Ye et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 10 (2014) 287–290
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of steroid N-acetylglucosaminides 1–4.
3
Fig. 2. Observed key HMBC correlations of 1.
Moreover, a J HMBC correlation was observed from the
anomeric proton at 5.28 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz) to C-3 at 78.2,
demonstrating C-3 as the glycosidic linkage position (Fig. 2), while
the -glycosidic linkage could be easily determined based on the
d
d
Compound 2 was deduced to be a C-28 steroid N-acetylglu-
1
13
cosaminide by comparison of its H and C NMR data (Tables 1 and
) with those of compound 1. The obvious difference between 2
and 1 was that the terminal methyl at 0.89 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H
9) in 1 was replaced by an exomethylene group [ 4.87 and 4.85
each 1H, br s), 106.3 (CH ), 156.4 (qC)] in 2, which was supported
by the molecular formula (C36
exomethylene unit in the side chain of the aglycone in 2 was
confirmed by the HMBC correlations from H -26 ( 1.05)/H -27 (
.06) to C-24 ( 156.4). Thus, compound 2 was elucidated to be 3-
-O-(2-acetamido-2-deoxy- -glucopyranosyl)-ergosta-
,24(28)-diene.
Compounds 3 and 4 were obtained as a mixture, and both have
the same molecular formula (C36 ) based on their HRESIMS
C NMR spectroscopic data of 3 and 4
Tables 1 and 2) were quite similar to 1, indicating that 3 and 4
were also steroid N-acetylglucosaminide derivatives. 3 and 4
possessed the same aglycone of ergosta-5-en-3 -ol by comparison
b
2
observed coupling constant (7.3 Hz) of the anomeric proton. The
measured optical rotation value of the glucosamine hydrochlo-
d
3
-
2
0
2
(
d
ride, [
reported in the literature {[
Armarego and Chai, 2003). Finally, the structure of 1 was
elucidated to be 3- -O-(2-acetamido-2-deoxy- -glucopyrano-
syl)- -sitosterol. Actually, compound 1 has been previously semi-
synthesized by coupling of -sitosterol with glucosamine
a
]
D
2
+ 67.4 (c 0.05, H O), was in good accordance with that
2
5
d
2
a
]
D
2
+ 71.8 (after 20 h, c 4, H O)}
2
4(28)
6
H59NO .) of 2. The D
(
b
b-D
d
b
3
3
d
1
b
5
d
b
b-D
hydrochloride in 2009 (Grover et al., 2009). Herein, it was
reported as a new naturally occurring steroid N-acetylglucosa-
minide, and its proton and carbon NMR data were completely
assigned for the first time.
H61NO
6
1
13
data. The H and
(
Table 1
1
3
C NMR data of compounds 1–4 (125 MHz, C
5 5
D N).
b
13
No.
1
2
3
4
of its NMR spectroscopic data with those of 1. In the C NMR
spectrum of the mixture, two sets of carbon signals assignable to C-
17–C-24 (Table 1) were clearly observed, implying 3 and 4 were a
pair of C-24 epimers. As summarized by Wright et al. (Wright et al.,
978), for some diastereomeric C-24 alkyl sterols, slight differ-
ences in the chemical shifts of side-chain carbons permitted the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
37.1
29.9
78.2
39.2
37.1
29.9
78.2
39.2
36.9
31.5
78.0
38.9
140.6
121.3
31.6
31.6
49.7
36.3
20.7
39.3
41.9
56.2
23.9
27.8
1
140.6
121.6
31.8
31.7
50.0
36.5
20.9
39.6
42.1
56.5
24.2
29.6
55.9
11.6
19.1
36.0
18.7
33.9
26.1
45.7
29.1
18.9
19.6
23.0
11.8
23.2
140.9
122.7
31.8
31.7
50.0
36.6
20.9
39.6
42.2
56.5
24.1
29.6
55.8
11.6
19.1
35.6
18.5
34.7
30.9
156.4
33.7
21.8
21.6
106.3
determination of the absolute configuration at C-24. As for 3 (24R),
C-26 (
only 1.8 ppm in contrast to a bigger difference of 3.0 ppm (C-26:
7.7; C-27: 20.7) in 4 (24S). Consequently, 3 and 4 were deduced as
(24R)-3- -O-(2-acetamido-2-deoxy- -glucopyranosyl)-
ergosta-5-ene and (24S)-3- -O-(2-acetamido-2-deoxy-
pyranosyl)-ergosta-5-ene, respectively.
To the best of our knowledge, none steroidal glycoside with a 2-
acetamido-2-deoxy- -glucose moiety has been so far isolated
d 20.1) and C-27 (d 18.3) have a chemical shift difference of
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
b
b-D
b
b-D-gluco-
b
-D
55.7
55.6
11.4
19.7
from vascular plants. Steroid N-acetylglucosaminides 1–4 were
tested for their cytotoxic effects against five human cancer cell
lines (BGC-823 and KE-97 gastric carcinoma, Huh-7 hepatocarci-
noma, Jurkat T cell lymphoblasts, and MCF-7 breast adenocarci-
35.5
18.8
33.4
29.6
38.5
32.0
20.1
18.3
14.9
35.8
18.6
TM
30.0
38.7
31.5
17.7
20.7
15.0
noma) using the CellTiter Glo luminescent cell viability assay (Ye
et al., 2013, 2014; Zang et al., 2013), but none of them was active
(
IC50s > 10
mM).
3. Experimental
OAc
23.3
170.3
100.5
57.8
23.0
170.0
100.2
57.7
75.8
71.9
78.2
62.2
3
.1. General procedures
1
70.3
0
1
100.5
57.8
76.1
72.2
78.2
62.5
0
Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin-Elmer 341 polar-
2
0
3
76.1
imeter (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). IR spectra were
measured on an Avatar 360 FT-IR spectrophotometer (Thermo
Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). NMR spectra were recorded on a
Bruker Avance DRX-500 spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Boston,
0
4
72.2
0
5
78.3
0
6
62.6