3728
M. Calderón et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 3725–3728
26. Roller, S.; Zhou, H.; Haag, R. Mol. Diversity 2005, 9, 305.
In summary, we have developed a new macromolecular nano-
27. Jedeszko, C.; Sloane, B. F. Biol. Chem. 2004, 385, 1017.
carrier from a dendritic polyglycerol scaffold. Optimal conditions
of synthesis and purification were studied for three different inter-
mediates pathways. Selective conjugation with maleimide-bearing
prodrugs as well as drug release in the presence of cathepsin B has
been successfully demonstrated. Cytotoxicity of the conjugates
against human tumor cell lines showed that the activity of the
drugs was primarily retained which encouraged us to study the
physical properties and use these systems for further in vivo
studies.
28. Worm, J.; Kirkin, A. F.; Dzhandzhugazyan, K. N.; Guldberg, P. J. Biol. Chem. 2001,
276, 39990.
29. Haag, R.; Mecking, S.; Türk, H. Patent Application DE10211664A1, 2002.
30. Note 1. General procedure for prodrug coupling: Polyglycerol (Mn = 20,000 g/mol,
PD = 2.0) was prepared according to published procedures.29 Polyglycerol
amine (DF = 20%) was prepared as previously described.21 The conjugation
reactions were performed at room temperature with vigorous stirring for
80 min. To two different flasks, containing 10 mL of
a solution of
polyglycerolamine (10 mg/mL, 2.7 mmol NH2-groups) in sterile 5 mM EDTA,
50 mM PBS solution pH 7.0 were added 4.5 mL of a solution of 2-iminothiolane
(2 mg/mL in the same solvent system, 1.2 equiv). After 20 min, prodrug
solutions were added (3 mg/mL in 5%
D-(+)-glucose pH 3.0 for EMC-Phe-Lys-
Doxo and 3.7 mg/mL in PBS solution for EMC-
D
-Ala-Phe-Lys-Lys-MTX). The
Acknowledgments
total amounts of each prodrug were added in three repeated aliquots until the
first evidence of precipitation was apparent, waiting ten minutes for addition
of each aliquot. After 1 h of reaction, the solutions were concentrated to 5 mL
using Centriprep YM10 (twice at 4000 U/min for 30 min). Polyglycerol-drug
conjugates were purified by gel-filtration through a Sephadex G-25 column
(Amersham) with PBS solution (pH 7) yielding approximately 10–15 mL of a
red and yellow solution, respectively. A second concentration with Centriprep
was made and finally the conjugates were lyophilized to yield a red (for
doxorubicin conjugate) or yellow (for methotrexate conjugate) crystalline
powder.Conjugate formation was studied by chromatography on reverse phase
TLC, by appearance of a faster band in sephadex column, and by SEC-HPLC.
Absence of physical encapsulation was investigated by performing the same
coupling procedure with polyglycerolamine alone. The drug concentration of
We thank the Ministry of Science for their continuing support of
this work for a NanoFuture award for R. Haag and F. Kratz (BMBF
03X5501).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
the
conjugates
495 = 10645 Mꢂ1 cmꢂ1
370 = 7420 Mꢂ1 cmꢂ1
was
determined
photometrically
at
495 nm
(
(
e
e
)
for the doxorubicin conjugate and at 370 nm
for methotrexate conjugate, after reconstitution of
References and notes
)
the lyophilized conjugates in PBS solution pH 5.8.
31. Note 2. Cleavage studies of dPG drug conjugates with cathepsin B: Enzymatically
active cathepsin B was purchased from Calbiochem (Bad Soden, FRG). Stock
1. Haag, R.; Kratz, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1198.
2. Duncan, R. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 688–701.
3. Vicent, M. V.; Dieudonné, L.; Carbajo, R. J.; Pineda-Lucena, A. Expert Opin. Drug
Delivery 2008, 5, 593.
solution of the dPG drug conjugates (3000
lM) were mixed with cathepsin B
(71.7 g/mL, 110 mU) in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 5.0, containing L-
l
4. Kiick, K. L. Science 2007, 317, 1182.
cysteine (8 mM). The samples were incubated at 37 °C and were collected over
16 h and analyzed by HPLC: column: BioSil SEC 250 from Biorad, mobile phase:
4 mM sodium phosphate, 0.15 M NaCl, 10% acetonitrile (pH 7.4), flow: 1.0 mL/
min; Kontron 422 pump and a Kontron 430 detector (at 495 and 220 nm). For
peak integration Geminyx software (version 1.91 by Goebel Instrumentelle
Analytik) was used. Control studies were carried out without cathepsin B
addition and no release was observed after 16 h of incubation.
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
5. Chytil, P.; Etrych, T.; Konák, C.; Šírová, M.; Mrkvan, T.; Boucek, J.; Ríhová, B.;
Ulbrich, K. J. Controlled Release 2008, 127, 121.
6. Kratz, F.; Abu Ajaj, K.; Warnecke, A. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2007, 16, 1037.
7. Kratz, F. J. Controlled Release 2008, 132, 171.
8. Hespe, W.; Meier, A. M.; Blankwater, Y. J. Arzneim.-Forsch. 1977, 27, 1158.
9. Liu, M. J.; Fréchet, J. M. J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. Today 1999, 2, 393.
10. Lee, C. C.; MacKay, J. A.; Fréchet, J. M. J.; Szoka, F. C. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23,
1517.
11. Tomalia, D. A.; Reyna, L. A.; Svenson, S. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007, 35, 61.
12. Svenson, S. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2009, 71, 445.
13. Sadler, K.; Tam, J. P. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 90, 195.
14. Ihre, H.; Padilla de Jesus, O. L.; Szoka, F. C. J.; Fréchet, J. M. J. Bioconjugate Chem.
2002, 13, 433.
32. Note 3. In vitro cellular experiments: Cytotoxicity with the dPG drug conjugates
and free drugs were performed with two human tumor cell lines: AsPC1 LN
(pancreatic carcinoma) and MDA-MB-231 LN (mamma carcinoma) both
transduced with the luciferase gene. Cells were grown as monolayer cultures
in cell culture flasks in DMEM Glutamax I culture medium supplemented with
10% heat-inactivated FCS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 lg/mL streptomycin.
Cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 10% carbon
dioxide at 37 °C. Media were routinely changed every 3 days. For subculture or
experiments, cells growing as monolayer cultures were released from the
tissue flasks by treatment with 0.05% trypsine/EDTA. For the experiments, cells
were used during the logarithmic growth phase.For the cytotoxicity assay, cells
were plated at 200,000 cells/well into a 96-well plate. Stock solutions of the
dPG drug conjugates (3 mM) were diluted with DMEM culture medium to
15. Grinstaff, M. W. Chemistry 2002, 8, 2839.
16. Haag, R.; Sunder, A.; Stumbé, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2954.
17. Xu, S.; Luo, Y.; Graeser, R.; Warnecke, A.; Kratz, F.; Hauff, P.; Licha, K.; Haag, R.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1030.
18. Frey, H.; Haag, R. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 90, 257.
19. Boysen, M. M. K.; Elsner, K.; Sperling, O.; Lindhorst, T. K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
4376.
20. Neerman, M. F.; Zhang, W.; Parrish, A. R.; Simanek, E. E. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 281,
129.
21. Khandare, J. J.; Minko, T. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 359.
22. Abu Ajaj, K.; Graeser, R.; Fichtner, I.; Kratz, F. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.
2009, 64, 413.
23. Warnecke, A.; Fichtner, I.; Sass, G.; Kratz, F. Arch. Pharm. 2007, 340, 389.
24. Tyagarajan, K.; Pretzer, E.; Wiktorowicz, J. E. Electrophoresis 2003, 24, 2348.
25. Kratz, F.; Müller, I. A.; Ryppa, C.; Warnecke, A. ChemMedChem 2008, 3, 20.
0.01–10
in 90 L of luciferase assay buffer (25 mM TRIS-phosphate pH 7.8; 2 mM EDTA;
2 mM DTT; 0.1% Triton X-100), and 10 L of the undiluted, as well as 1/10 and
lM and exposed to the cells for 72 h in triplicate. Cells were then lysed
l
l
1/100 dilutions were measured in a Luminometer (BMG Lumistar) using the
luciferase substrate from Promega (Promega E4550), according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. IC50 values were determined using GRAPHPAD
prism software.