a lack of synthetic methodologies, the main chemistry with
chiral sulfinyl derivatives has been carried out using a
p-tolylsulfinyl group.2,7 Nevertheless, recent studies have
demonstrated that hindered alkyl substituents on the sulfur
do confer better stereochemical control in different processes
compared to their aryl counterparts. Pioneering work from
Casey’s group has shown the superiority of tert-butyl
showed that the diastereomeric ratio of the final aziridines
is highly dependent on the nature of the chiral auxiliary. The
10
14
Ruano and Davis groups were the first to report on the
modest diastereocontrol exerted by aromatic sulfinyl auxil-
iaries. A subsequent study by Ruano and Fern a´ ndez showed
that the tert-butylsulfinyl group was the best chiral auxiliary
for this transformation, affording the final products with high
8
10
sulfoxide over the p-tolyl sulfoxide in Michael addition. The
de.
same trend was recently reported by Ellmann in the synthesis
The syntheses of both isomers of the isopropanesulfinate
esters, 2(R ) and 2(S ), have been carried out in high yield
S S
5
of chiral amines and in metal-catalyzed asymmetric syn-
9
thesis, by Ruano and Fern a´ ndez in the aziridination of
and diastereoslectivity applying our DAG methodology
10
13
sulfinylimine, and by Carretero in the Pauson-Khand
(Scheme 1). It is noteworthy that, in this case, we have
reaction.11
These results promoted an active search of new and more
12
hindered sulfinylating agents. Surprisingly, the synthesis
of sulfinyl auxiliaries with an intermediate size between the
p-tolylsulfinyl and the tert-butylsulfinyl group did not attract
much interest. Significantly, while the effect of the steric
hindrance on the stereoselectivity is always beneficial, there
are cases where the reaction becomes exceedingly slow if
not inhibited (vide infra).10 With these premises in mind,
we thought that the development of less sterically demanding
sulfinyl substituents such as the isopropyl derivatives might
present the advantages of lower molecular weight and higher
reactivity and could thus be a good alternative to the popular
tert-butyl sulfinyl group, provided that the enantioselectivity
achieved is equally high. In this communication, we have
found that this is indeed true for two important reactions,
the Corey-Chaykovsky reaction of chiral sulfinylimine (eq
Scheme 1
found that the glucose-derived dicyclohexylidene-D-glucose
(DCG) 1 gives better chemical yields and diastereoselec-
tivities than diacetone-D-glucose. Additionally, the DCG
isopropylsulfinate esters 2 were stable, as no decomposition
of these sulfinates was detected after months at 4 °C.
Treatment of 2(S
suspending the crude reaction mixture in silica gel afforded,
after filtration and crystallization, the sufinamide 3(S ) with
S
) with LHMDS at -78 °C followed by
1) and the organocatalytic allylation of acyl hydrazones with
ferrocenylsulfinyl derivatives (eq 2). In both processes, the
isopropylsulfinyl group behaves better than the tert-butyl-
sulfinyl and p-tolylsulfinyl groups, both in terms of reactivity
and stereoselectivity.
S
a good 80% isolated yield. Using Davis’ conditions for the
synthesis of chiral sulfinyl aldimine afforded in a one-pot
S
manner phenyl isopropylsulfinylimine 4(S ) in 75% yield
14
and in only 2 h. The absolute configuration of the obtained
sulfinylimine was S as shown by X-ray analysis (see
Supporting Information), confirming the S configuration at
sulfur in the starting sulfinate ester (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
Our first comparative study was the Corey-Chakovsky
reaction of chiral sulfinylimine for the synthesis of chiral
aziridine. The synthetic importance of this reaction has
attracted the attention of different research groups, who
A comparative study on the asymmetric aziridination of
N-sulfinylaldimines 4, 5, and 6 employing either dimethyl-
sulfonium methylide (A) or dimethyloxosulfonium methylide
(B) as methylene transfer is presented in Table 1.
(7) Solladi e´ , G. Heteroat. Chem. 2002, 13, 443.
(
8) Casey, M.; Manage, A. C.; Nezhat, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29,
As it can be seen from Table 1, both the tert-butyl and
isopropylsulfinyl groups are better chiral auxiliaries than the
5
821.
9) (a) Liu, G.; Cogan, D. A.; Owens, T. D.; Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P.;
(
Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1278. (b) Owens, T. D.; Hollander,
F. J.; Oliver, A. G.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1539.
(13) (a) Fern a´ ndez, I.; Khiar, N.; Llera, J. M.; Alcudia, F. J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 6789. (b) Khiar, N.; Fer a´ ndez, I.; Alcudia, F. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 5719. (c) Khiar, N.; Alcudia, F.; Espartero, J.-L.; Rodr ´ı guez, L.;
Fern a´ ndez, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7598 and references therein
(14) Davis, F. A.; Zhou, P.; Liang, C. H.; Reddy, R. E. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1995, 6, 1511.
(
10) Garc ´ı a-Ruano, J. L.; Fern a´ ndez, I.; del Prado, M.; Alcudia, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 3407.
(
11) Adrio, J. Carretero, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7441.
(12) Han, Z.; Krishnamurthy, D.; Grover, P.; Fang, Q. K.; Senanayake,
C. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7880.
1308
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 7, 2005