10.1002/cbic.202000538
ChemBioChem
FULL PAPER
simultaneously cleaved from the resin with the TFA/TIS cocktail Conclusion
to provide conjugates 5 (13.3 mg) and 7 (3.1 mg) after purification
by RP-HPLC in 10% and 8% yield respectively, demonstrating the
suitability of 10 for SPPS. To obtain conjugate 6, bearing the
TLR7-ligand, the MMT-group in 31 was selectively removed with
a cocktail of AcOH/TFE/DCM (1/2/7 v/v/v). The obtained free
amine was elongated with spacer 33 and Boc-protected TLR7-
ligand building block 34 to give conjugate 6 (11.0 mg) in 2% yield,
after removal of all the protecting groups, cleavage from the resin
and RP-HPLC purification. The same sequence of events was
applied to the N-terminal amine in immobilized peptide 32 to
afford conjugate 8 (17.0 mg) in 8% yield.
In conclusion, we have described the development of two
mannose-6-C-phosphonate (M6Po) building blocks which allow
for stabilized M6P-analogues to be incorporated in peptide
sequences to target the M6P receptor. To prevent
dephosphorylation by endogenous phosphatases, the O-
phosphate in the naturally occurring mannose-6-phosphate was
replaced by a C-phosphonate moiety. The first building block
carries an O-propargyl group at the anomeric center of the
mannose-6-C-phosphonate, which allows for the incorporation of
the M6Po in peptide sequences through an azide-alkyne click
reaction. The second building block, a C-mannoside, was
designed and synthesized for application in solid-phase peptide
synthesis. The acid-stable anomeric linkage and protecting
groups used enabled the streamlined in-line incorporation of the
building block during SPPS. With the building blocks, various
peptide conjugates were assembled, containing either an MHC-I
or an MHC-II epitope, an M6Po-cluster presenting six mannose-
6-phosphonates, and a TLR7-ligand. Although immunological
evaluation has shown that conjugation of the M6Po-clusters
inhibits antigen presentation, the ability of the TLR7-ligand
conjugates to induce DC maturation was significantly improved.
While the M6Po clusters effectively trafficked the conjugates to
the endosome, where the conjugates interacted with TLR7
receptor, the processing of the conjugates was impeded by the
M6Po-clusters. Future conjugates will be designed featuring
cleavable linkers that allow for the release of the clusters during
endolysosomal processing, effectively liberating the incorporated
peptide antigens for presentation.
Immunological evaluation
We assessed the capacity of the conjugates 1-8 to induce
maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) and stimulate antigen
presentation (Figure 2). In these assays reference compounds
35-40, lacking the mannose-6-phosphonate clusters, were used
as a control (See supporting information Scheme S2). The
activation of DCs can be measured by the detection of the
production of interleukin-12 (IL-12). First, the O-M6Po conjugates
1-4 were evaluated (Figure 2A). To this end, murine bone
marrow/derived DCs were stimulated for 24 hours with the
compounds and the amount of secreted IL-12 was measured in
the supernatant. As expected, conjugation with solely a cluster of
M6Po (as in conjugates 1 and 3) does not induce DC maturation.
In contrast, the TLR7-ligand SLP conjugates (36 and 37) induce
IL12 production due to stimulation of the TLR7 receptor.
Interestingly, the conjugates carrying the M6Po-cluster and the
TLR7-ligand (2 and 4) induced a stronger activation of the DCs
than their counterparts solely bearing a TLR7-ligand (i.e., SLP-
conjugates 36 and 37). The position of the M6Po-clusters and
TLR7 ligand in these conjugates did not seem to influence the
activity of the conjugates. Similar effects were observed for the
conjugates 6 and 8 with the C-M6Po-clusters, indicating that the
C-mannosyl-6-C-phosphonate is an adequate mimic of its O-
mannosyl counterpart and that the enhanced stimulatory effect is
independent of the peptide sequence (Figure 2B, see also
supporting Figure S1). Overall this indicates that conjugation of
the M6Po-cluster to a peptide antigen adjuvanted with a TLR7-
ligand enhances DC maturation by improving uptake of the
conjugate and/or trafficking of the conjugates to the endosomally
located TLR7 receptor.
Processing of the two peptides was investigated by assessing
presentation of the SIINFEKL epitope on MHC-I by the DCs to
CD8+ T cells and presentation of the helper epitope (HAAHA) to
CD4+ T cells. For the former assay, a hybridoma (B3Z) CD8+ T
cell line was used, while the latter employed an OTIIZ hybridoma
CD4+ T cell line. As can be seen in Figures 2C and 2D, attachment
of the TLR7-ligand to the SLPs led to the enhanced presentation
of the antigens (See for example 35 vs. 36/37 and 38 vs. 40),
however the inclusion of the M6Po-clusters hampered
presentation through both the MHC class I and MHC class II
pathways (See for example 36 vs. 4, 37 vs. 2 and 40 vs. 6). This
indicates that the conjugation of M6Po-clusters affects
intracellular trafficking or processing of the peptides.
Keywords: C-glycoside • mannose-6-phosphate receptor •
peptide conjugate • solid-phase peptide synthesis • TLR-ligand
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
N. Dahms, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Gen. Subj. 2002, 1572, 317–
340.
P. Ghosh, N. M. Dahms, S. Kornfeld, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003,
4, 202–213.
J. J. Distler, J. F. Guo, G. W. Jourdian, O. P. Srivastava, O.
Hindsgaul, J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 21687–92.
P. Y. Tong, W. Gregory, S. Kornfeld, J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264,
7962–9.
S. J. York, L. S. Arneson, W. T. Gregory, N. M. Dahms, S. Kornfeld,
J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 1164–71.
K. Prydz, A. W. Brändli, M. Bomsel, K. Simons, J. Biol. Chem. 1990,
265, 12629–35.
K. El Cheikh, I. Basile, A. Da Silva, C. Bernon, P. Cérutti, F.
Salgues, M. Perez, M. Maynadier, M. Gary-Bobo, C. Caillaud, et al.,
Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14774–14777.
E. Dalle Vedove, G. Costabile, O. M. Merkel, Adv. Healthc. Mater.
2018, 7, 1701398.
[8]
[9]
C. A. Parra-López, R. Lindner, I. Vidavsky, M. Gross, E. R. Unanue,
J. Immunol. 1997, 158, 2670–9.
[10]
R. Greupink, H. I. Bakker, W. Bouma, C. Reker-Smit, D. K. F.
Meijer, L. Beljaars, K. Poelstra, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 317,
514–521.
[11]
C. Minnelli, L. Cianfruglia, E. Laudadio, R. Galeazzi, M. Pisani, E.
Crucianelli, D. Bizzaro, T. Armeni, G. Mobbili, J. Drug Target. 2018,
26, 242–251.
5
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.