J. Sun et al.
Journal of Photochemistry & Photobiology, A: Chemistry 406 (2021) 113007
8
-benzochromone-3-carbaldehyde-(fluorescein)hydrazone with the
2.3. Measurement of UV–vis and fluorescence spectra
2
+
2+
fluorescence test of Zn and the colorimetric test of Cu in different
solvents with this probe. It is necessary to mention that the colorimetric
detection of Cu2 can be observed with the naked eye which is simple
ꢀ 3
+
+
+
2+
Stock solutions (5 × 10 M) of various metal ions (Na , K , Li ,
+
+
2+
3+
2+
3+
ꢀ
2+
3+
2+
2+
2+
2+
2+
2+
Ag , Ca , Ba , Mg , Zn , Cu , Hg , Pb , Mn , Ni , Co ,
2
+
and quick to detect ions [35,36].
Cd , Fe , Cr , Al ) were prepared in ethanol. Stock solution of
3
probe L (5 × 10 M) was obtain in DMF.
In the fluorescence spectroscopy tests, the mixed solution of L (20 L)
μ
2
. Experimental
and various metal ions (20
μ
L) was added to the cuvette and diluted with
EtOH/H O solution (9/1, V/V) to 2 mL. For the setting of parameters,
2
2
.1. Materials and instruments
the excitation wavelength was set to 428 nm, and the excitation and the
emission slit were set to 5 nm and 3 nm, respectively. The detection
method of UV–vis spectroscopy was basically the same as that of fluo-
rescence. The only difference was that the diluent of the mixed solution
All reagents in this experimentation were sourced from commodity
suppliers and no further purification was performed when used. Ultra-
pure water was used in this experiment. Fluorescence spectrum, UV
absorption spectrum, ESI-MS spectrum and 1H NMR spectrum were
of L (10
μ
μ
2
L) and various metal ions (10 L) was EtOH/H O solution (5/2,
ꢀ 1
V/V).
obtained by Hitachi RF-4500 spectrometer equipped with 1 cm quartz
cuvette, Shimzdzu UV-240 spectrophotometer, Bruker Esquire 600
spectrometer and Bruker 400 MHz with TMS as the internal standard,
respectively. The melting point was measured on a Beijing XT4-100x
micro-melting point instrument.
3
. Results and discussion
.1. Effect of solvent
The solvent had a crucial influence on the coordination of the probe L
3
2
.2. Synthesis
-oxo-4H-benzo[h]methylene-3-carbaldehyde [37] and fluorescein
with the metal ion. In order to explore the most suitable solvent for
detecting the coordination of L and Zn2 , the solvent selection experi-
ment was carried out by the fluorescence spectrum. When the ability of L
to recognize various metal ions was studied in ethanol solution, we
+
4
hydrazide [38] were synthesized according to methods reported in
previous literature. Based on the following method, 7,8-benzochromo-
ne-3-carbaldehyde-(fluorescein)hydrazone (Scheme 1) was synthe-
sized, fluorescein hydrazide (0.24 g, 0.7 mmol) and 4-oxo-4H-benzo[h]
methylene-3-carbaldehyde (0.16 g, 0.7 mmol) was dissolved in an
appropriate amount of ethanol. The mixture was refluxed for 24 h under
stirred condition with appearance of pale yellow precipitate. After that,
the mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered under reduced
pressure to obtain a crude product. The obtained crude product was
recrystallized from ethanol and then the product was dried in a vacuum
2+
found that L showed obvious fluorescence upon addition of Zn or
2+
2+
2+
Mg . Therefore, we tried to distinguish between Zn and Mg by
2+
2+
changing the solvent. Zn or Mg was added into ethanol, methanol,
ethyl acetate, DMSO, DMF and acetonitrile solutions respectively to
explore the fluorescence emission of probe L. As shown in Fig. 1a, we
2+
regretted to find that the fluorescence changes of L on Zn and L on
2+
Mg were basically the same in the above solvents. Therefore, we chose
the ethanol that exhibited the strongest fluorescence after L combining
with metal ions as the solvent. And then we tried to add water into
ethanol to improve the selectivity of L to metal ions by changing the
polarity of the solvent [6]. As described in Fig. 1b, firstly, we tried to add
1
to obtain a pale yellow solid. Yield: 72.68 %; mp: 335–338 ℃. H NMR
(
400 Hz, DMSO-d
6
, TMS) δ
H
(ppm): 9.89 (s, 2 H), 8.88 (d, 1H, J =0.52
Hz,), 8.44 (q, 1H, J =1.76 Hz), 8.40 (d, 1H, J =7.72 Hz), 8.04 (d, 1H, J
7.4 Hz), 7.90 (m, 3 H), 7.75 (m, 2 H), 7.58 (m, 2 H), 7.07 (m, 1 H), 6.65
d, 2H, J =2.2 Hz), 6.49 (d, 2H, J =8.64 Hz), 6.43 (dd, 2H, J =8.68 Hz, J
2.28 Hz) (Fig. S1). 13C NMR (400 Hz, DMSO-d
, TMS) δ (ppm):
1
0 % water to ethanol, namely EtOH/H
2
O (10/1, V/V). Although the
=
2+
fluorescence intensity of Mg
decreased significantly, there still
(
2+
showed fluorescence that would interfere with the detection of Zn
.
=
6
C
Then, we tried to add 20 % water to ethanol, namely EtOH/H
2
O (5/1,
1
1
1
1
74.74, 164.50, 159.25, 153.29, 153.07, 152.66, 151.45, 140.84,
35.74, 134.79, 130.26, 129.68, 128.87, 128.62, 128.51, 128.22,
26.21, 124.32, 123.90, 123.53, 122.32, 120.38, 120.25, 120.00,
2+
V/V). In this solution, the fluorescence of Mg was almost quenched,
2+
but the fluorescence intensity of Zn was too low. Therefore, we found
2
that the most suitable solvent ratio EtOH/H O (9/1, V/V) within the
13.03, 110.25, 103.21, 65.65, 56.59, 19.08 (Fig. S3). ESI-MS calcu-
range of 10 %–20 % moisture content.
lated for [M+H] 553.1321, found 553.0766. [M + Na]+ 575.0566
+
(
Fig. S4).
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions.
2