Tetrahedron
Letters
Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 6831–6832
New deprotection method of the
2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc) group with (Bu3Sn)2
Hiroomi Tokimoto and Koichi Fukase*
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
Received 12 July 2005; revised 2 August 2005; accepted 4 August 2005
Available online 19 August 2005
Abstract—The 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc) groupwas efficiently removed in high yields with (Bu 3Sn)2 in DMF under
microwave heating. The present method was applied to deprotection of the Troc group on solid support.
Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
The 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc) grouphas
been frequently used for the protection of amino and
hydroxyl groups in organic synthesis, especially oligo-
saccharide synthesis.1 For example, b-selective glycosyl-
ation of the glucosaminyl donor is readily effected by
virtue of neighboring participation of the 2-N-Troc
group.2 The Troc groupis generally removed via a
reductive elimination process, such as Zn in AcOH,
Zn–Cu in AcOH, Zn–Pb in THF, Zn–N-methylimidaz-
ole,3 Li in liquid NH3, SmI2 in THF, Cd in AcOH–
DMF, or electrolysis.1 Most of these methods are
carried out under heterogeneous conditions and hence
are difficult to apply to solid-phase synthesis. In addition,
we have sometimes observed that significant amounts of
dichloroethoxycarbonylated byproducts were formed by
the cleavage of the Troc groupwith Zn or Zn–Cu in
AcOH.
the application of the present method to solid-phase
synthesis. Previously, we reported solid-phase synthesis
of indol-2-ones (2-oxindoles) by means of aryl radical
cyclization of resin-bound N-(2-bromophenyl)acryl-
amides using Bu3SnH.4 We found that DMF was the
best choice for the radical cyclization on solid support
inducing a reagent concentration effect of Bu3SnH on
the polymer support, whereas the same reaction in
DMF under liquid-phase condition did not proceed.
Surprisingly, the Troc group was removed quantitatively
by using (Bu3Sn)2 (0.6 equiv) in DMF without any effect
on the allyl group. The resulting amino group was then
acetylated for easy purification to give the desired 2 in
99% yield. AIBN and Bu3SnH in DMF gave many
byproducts, including dichloroethoxycarbonylated
compounds (yield of 2 was 17%). Et3B also cleaved the
Troc groupbut afforded the ethyl groupadduct to the
allyl group.
We assumed that the Troc groupwould be removed via
a radical intermediate formed by abstraction of the
chlorine atom and, therefore, expected that the radical
generating reagents could cleave the Troc group. We
first examined the reaction by using N-Troc-glucos-
amine allyl glycoside 1 and AIBN (0.1 equiv) and
Bu3SnH (1.1 equiv), Et3B (1.1 equiv), or (Bu3Sn)2 in
benzene or toluene under reflux, but the cleavage of
the Troc groupproceeded very slowly to give only a tiny
amount of the desired product. We then checked the
cleavage reaction of the Troc groupin DMF considering
Ph
Ph
O
O
(Bu3Sn)2, DMF
100˚C, 1 day
O
O
O
O
BnO
BnO
TrocNH
H2N
OAllyl
OAllyl
1
Ph
O
O
Ac2O
O
BnO
AcNH
99%
OAllyl
2
We next examined the removal of the Troc groupwith
(Bu3Sn)2 under microwave irradiation to reduce the
reaction time. Deprotection in benzene hardly pro-
ceeded even under microwave irradiation (Table 1, entry
1). Microwave irradiation dramatically accelerated
Keywords: Protective group; Deprotection; Radical reaction;
Microwave.
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 6 6850 5388; fax: +81 6 6850
0040-4039/$ - see front matter Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.08.026