be noted that the absolute configuration of the major products
obtained here is inversed compared to those derived from
malononitrile (2a) while in the presence of the same chiral
tertiary amine-thiourea catalyst C3 under otherwise same
conditions.
In summary, a general and efficient three-component cascade
asymmetric reaction of salicylaldehyde, malononitrile/cyanoacetate
and nitromethane has been developed using a simple chiral
tertiary amino-thiourea as catalyst without the need for
additional additives. This protocol provides an atom-economic
and straightforward method for the synthesis of chiral highly
functionalized 2-amino-4H-chromenes in good yields with high
enantioselectivities from simple starting materials. Furthermore,
the absolute configuration of the major products was found to be
switchable via a simple change in one of the reactants while still
using the same catalyst system. Further studies to expand the
substrate scope and to probe the origin of stereocontrol are
currently in progress.
Several control experiments were conducted to gain some
insight into the mechanism of this three-component cascade
reaction (Scheme S1 in the ESIw). In the presence of the racemic
catalyst (ꢁ)-C1, no reaction occurred between salicylaldehyde (1a)
and nitromethane (3a) (Scheme S1 (ESIw), eqn (1)). In contrast,
the reaction of 1a with malononitrile (2a) took place smoothly
under the same reaction conditions to give 6a and Ia, respectively,
clearly indicating that the reaction of 1a with 2a should be
involved as the first step in this three-component cascade sequence
(Scheme S1 (ESIw), eqn (2)). The reaction of Ia with 3a catalysed
by C3 afforded chiral product 4a in 72% yield with 73% ee
(eqn (1)). Under the same conditions, the reaction of racemic 6a
with 3a also resulted in comparable result (eqn (2)).9 These results
suggested that 6a might be in equilibrium with Ia in the reaction
system, and a nucleophilic attack by 3a would pull the equilibrium
to generate the final product 4a, which is also consistent with
previous findings.3b,c
We thank Prof. Hongtao Zhang, Yun Wei and Shuangliu
Zhou for their help with X-ray crystallographic analyses. This
work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (20972001, 21172002) and Anhui Provincial Natural
Science Foundation (090416236).
Notes and references
1 (a) M. Kidwai, S. Saxena, M. K. R. Khan and S. S. Thukral, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett., 2005, 15, 4295; (b) N. J. Thumar and M. P. Patel,
ARKIVOC, 2009, 13, 363; (c) N. M. Sabry, H. M. Mohamed,
E. S. A. E. H. Khattab, S. S. Motlaq and A. M. El-Agrody, Eur.
J. Med. Chem., 2011, 46, 765.
2 For selected examples, see: (a) J. M. Doshi, D. Tian and C. Xing,
J. Med. Chem., 2006, 49, 7731; (b) W. Kemnitzer, S. Jiang, Y. Wang,
S. Kasibhatla, C. Crogan-Grundy, M. Bubenik, D. Labrecque,
R. Denis, S. Lamothe, G. Attardo, H. Gourdeau, B. Tseng,
J. Drewea and S. X. Cai, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2008, 18, 603;
(c) S. G. Das, J. M. Doshi, D. Tian, S. N. Addo, B. Srinivasan,
D. L. Hermanson and C. Xing, J. Med. Chem., 2009, 52, 5937.
3 For selected examples, see: (a) D. Gree, S. Vorin, V. L. Manthati,
F. Caijo, G. Viault, F. Manero, P. Juin and R. Gree, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2008, 49, 3276; (b) M. N. Elinson, A. S. Dorofeev,
F. M. Miloserdov, A. I. Ilovaisky, S. K. Feducovich,
P. A. Belyakov and G. I. Nikishina, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008,
350, 591; (c) M. N. Elinson, A. I. Ilovaisky, V. M. Merkulova,
P. A. Belyakov, A. O. Chizhov and G. I. Nikishin, Tetrahedron,
2010, 66, 4043; (d) K. Kumaravel and G. Vasuki, Green Chem.,
2009, 11, 1945; (e) S. N. Murthy, B. Madhav, V. P. Reddy and
Y. V. D. Nageswar, Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 3649.
ð1Þ
ð2Þ
On the basis of the above observations and previous studies,3 a
possible mechanism for the present tertiary amino-thiourea-
catalysed three-component cascade reaction was proposed
(Scheme 1). First, a tandem Knoevenagel condensation–cyclization
reaction of 1 with 2 would generate an intermediate I, which might
be in fast equilibrium with 6. Then the addition of 3 to I giving the
desired final product 4 or 5 should be the main stereodifferentiating
step. However, the exact mechanism for the stereoselective control
process, especially the unexpected reversal of the product absolute
configuration resulting from the use of 2a and 2b, remains unclear
at present and deserves further detailed study.
4 (a) J. W. Xie, X. Huang, L. P. Fan, D. C. Xu, X. S. Li, H. Su and
Y. H. Wen, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 3077; (b) Q. Ren,
W. Y. Siau, Z. Du, K. Zhang and J. Wang, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011,
17, 7781.
5 For selected recent reviews, see: (a) D. J. Ramon and M. Yus,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1602; (b) C. F. Barbas III, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 42; (c) Ł. Albrecht, H. Jiang and
K. A. Jørgensen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8492;
(d) A. Moyano and R. Rios, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 4703.
6 (a) Y. Yamaoka, H. Miyabe and Y. Takemoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2007, 129, 6686; (b) X. S. Wang, G. S. Yang and G. Zhao,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2008, 19, 709; (c) S. Bai, X. Liang,
B. Song, P. S. Bhadury, D. Hu and S. Yang, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
2011, 22, 518.
7 During the preparation of this manuscript, a paper describing chiral
thiourea-catalysed asymmetric three-component reactions among
aromatic aldehyde, malononitrile, and coumarin/cyclohexane-1,3-
dione to give pyranocoumarins and 2-amino-4H-pyran appeared:
G. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Yan, R. Chen, S. Wang, Y. Ma and
R. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 878.
8 T. Okino, Y. Hoashi and Y. Takemoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003,
125, 12672.
9 The good chemical yield obtained here makes less probable a
process involving a direct SN2 substitution of 6a with 3a to give
the chiral product 4a.
Scheme 1 Proposed mechanism of the three-component reaction.
5882 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 5880–5882
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012