C. Thomassigny et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 1117–1119
1119
Table 2. Enantioselective a-amination of ketones and aldehydes by
DBAD catalyzed by L-proline 1a or L-azetidine carboxylic acid 1b
6. Pihko, P. M.; Pohjakallio, A. Synlett 2004, 12, 2115–
2118.
7. Saaby, S.; Bella, M.; Jorgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 8120–8121.
Entry Substrate Catalyst Time Product Yield ee
(h)
(%)
(%)
8. Liu, X.; Li, H.; Deng, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 167–169.
9. List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5656–5657.
10. Bogevig, A.; Juhl, K.; Kumaragurubaran, N.; Zhuang,
W.; Jorgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 1868–1871;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1790–1793.
11. Kumaragurubaran, N.; Juhl, K.; Zhuang, W.; Bogevig,
A.; Jorgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6254–
6255.
1
2
3
4
5
6
3
3
4
4
5
5
1a
1b
1a
1b
1a
1b
114a
114a
3.5
22
1.25
15
6
6
7
7
8
8
49
54
62
60
62
69
94
90
54
74
91
72
Conditions: Reactions mixtures were stirred at rt in DCM.
a Decoloration was not complete.
12. Duthaler, R. O. Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 1005–1008;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 975–978.
13. Poupardin, O.; Greck, C.; Genet, J.-P. Synlett 1998, 1279–
1281.
14. The enantiomeric excess (ee) of the products were deter-
mined by HPLC using a JACSO PU2089plus apparatus and
a column Chiralcel OD. Eluant: heptane/i-PrOH: 93/7; flow
In summary, we have shown that L-azetidine carboxylic
acid can be used as a catalyst for the asymmetric electro-
philic amination of aldehydes and ketones by DBAD.
Generally, if the yields are comparable to those obtained
by using L-proline, the enantiomeric excesses are
increased for substrates such as cyclohexanone and
propanal.
0.9 ml/min; k 260 nm. Compound 2b (T 45 °C): sminor
=
=
18.52 min and smajor = 24.91 min; 6 (T 30 °C): sminor
21.45 min and
smajor = 25.01 min; for
7
(T 45 °C):
sminor = 16.02 min and smajor = 17.19 min; for 8 (T 45
°C): sminor = 30.14 min and smajor = 38.38 min.
15. Compound 2b was purified by flash chromatography
(Et2O/pentane, 2/1): yield 60%; mp 103 °C; as reported
before,11 the enantioselectivity of the a-aminated product
is only reduced by a few percent by purification using silica
References and notes
1. Greck, C.; Drouillat, B.; Thomassigny, C. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 7, 1377–1385.
2. Erdik, E. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 8747–8782.
3. Evans, D. A.; Nelson, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
6452–6453.
4. (a) Evans, D. A.; Johnson, D. S. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 595–
598; (b) Juhl, K.; Jorgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 2420–2421.
5. Yamashita, Y.; Ishitani, H.; Kobayashi, S. Can. J. Chem.
2000, 78, 666–672.
25
column chromatography: ½aꢀD ꢁ24.1 (c 0.1, DCM, 81%
ee); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) d 7.32 (m, 10H, Ar), 6.88
(s, 1H, NH), 5.10 (m, 5H, CH2Ph and H-2), 2.47–1.65
(m, 8H, H-3, H-4, H-5, and H-6); 13C NMR (CDCl3,
60 MHz) d 207.54 (C-1), 156.09 (CO), 135.63–127.52 (Ar),
68.21, 67.56 (CH2Ph), 65.73 (C-2), 41.28 (C-6), 30.64,
26.88, 26.66, 24.22 (C-2, C-3, C-4, and C-5); Anal. Calcd
for C22H24N2O5 (396.17): C, 66.65; H, 6.10; N, 7.07.
Found C, 66.39; H, 5.88; N, 7.19.