312
J. Zhang et al. / Journal of Catalysis 383 (2020) 311–321
exploring lignin derivatives upgrading [10,23–25]. Roman-Leshkov
et al. demonstrated that MoO3 effectively catalyzed the
hydrogenolysis of lignin-derived oxygenates to produce high yields
of aromatic hydrocarbons without ring saturation [26]. It was also
reported the selective conversion of guaiacol over MoO3 to produce
various alkylphenols in ethanol without the addition of gaseous
hydrogen, with 99% conversion and 94% selectivity of alkylphenols
[9]. Moreover, supported MoO3 catalysts also showed preferable
activity of C-O cleavage [4,10,27]. All these important contribu-
tions indicate the possibility for MoO3 to perform excellent ability
of C-O cleavage in moderate conditions. However, compared with
noble metal catalyst, MoO3 was relatively less active, and thus
the improvement of reactivity was crucial for the development of
Mo-based catalyst. Therefore, the rational design of catalysts,
which can selectively cleave the C-O bond and improve reaction
activity without aromatic saturation under mild conditions, are
attracting increasing attention. In previous reports, Co(Ni) as the
promoter could significantly enhance the activity of molybdenum
sulfide [13], and Co addition to supported molybdenum catalyst
enhanced the total hydrodeoxygenation selectivity by 45% in the
hydrodeoxygenation of anisole [28]. While, to the best of our
knowledge, no systematic studies have been performed to investi-
gate the promotion effect of Co and Ni on MoO3 catalyst and reac-
tion mechanism for hydrodeoxygenation reactions.
Previous reports have shown that MoO3 follow a reverse redox
reaction mechanism that would result in the removal of the oxy-
gen atom from the oxygenates upon the adsorption of the sub-
strates on the oxygen vacancy sites to form a Mo-O bond with
subsequent regeneration of the vacancy with H2 to produce water
[26]. The oxygen in the reactant then fills the oxygen vacancy,
leading to oxygen transfer to the catalyst and the formation of
the unsaturated product [25,29]. Considering the origin of the cat-
alytic activity of these materials, it is hypothesized that the oxygen
vacancy (i.e., an uncoordinated metal site on the metal oxide) is
responsible for hydrodeoxygenation over both pure and supported
MoO3 catalysts [25,30,31]. Shanks et al. reported that the MoO3
catalyst needed to be reduced to a more active form in order to
fully deoxygenate the pyrolysis vapors [25]. Therefore, the catalyst
requires a constant stream of H2 for continuous reduction and
vacant site formation [25]. Moreover, Roman-Leshkov and co-
workers used combined Raman, XRD, and XPS spectroscopy aug-
mented with the deactivation study, to reveal that the activity of
MoO3 could be predominantly promoted by uncoordinated Mo5+
species, whereas Mo4+ species should be related to the less activity
for hydrodeoxygenation reaction [2,21,25,31,32] corresponding to
the deactivation reason of MoC2 that was subsequently trans-
formed to MoO2 [24]. The above studies suggest the critical role
of intermediate state(s) of Mo species on its catalytic performance.
Moreover, extensive literatures have been reported on the acidic
sites that could also serve as active sites to adsorb the oxygen atom
of oxygen-containing compounds and then improve the activity of
catalysts [8,33].
mechanistic insights into the active sites of catalysts in the
hydrogenolysis of lignin-derived DBF is key to provide new
insights for catalyst design and potential applications for bio-oils
upgrading.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
Ammonium molybdate ((NH4)6Mo7O24ꢁ4H2O, ꢂ99.0%), cobalt
nitrate (Co(NO3)2ꢁ6H2O, ꢂ98.5%) and nickel nitrate (Ni(NO3)2ꢁ6H2-
O, ꢂ98.0%) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co.
Methanol (CH3OH, 99.8%) and n-decane (C10H22, 98%) were pur-
chased from Tianjin Kermel Chemical Reagent Co. Dibenzofuran
(C12H8O, 98.0%) and n-dodecane (C12H26, 99.0%) were obtained
from Aladdin Chemical Reagent Co. All of the materials were ana-
lytical reagent grade and utilized without further purification.
2.2. Preparation of catalysts
MoO3 was prepared by calcining (NH4)6Mo7O24 under Ar/O2
(40/20 mL minꢀ1) flow at 500 °C for 4 h. 3 wt% Co(Ni)/MoO3 were
prepared by the wetness impregnation method with methanol
solution of Ni(NO3)2 or Co(NO3)2. Typically, a certain amount of
Ni(NO3)2ꢁ6H2O or Co(NO3)2ꢁ6H2O was dissolved in 60 mL methanol
at room temperature and then 2.00 g MoO3 was added under vig-
orous stirring for 8 h. After that, methanol was removed using a
rotary evaporator at 40 °C and the slightly damp sample was dried
overnight at 80 °C. Finally, the samples were calcined at 400 °C for
4 h under Ar/O2 (40/20 mL minꢀ1) flow for further characterization
and catalytic measurements. Co(Ni)MoO4 were prepared using a
precipitation method described in detail in the Supporting
Information.
MoO3 reduced at different temperature were denoted as MoO3-
n (n = 300, 400, 500 and 600 °C). In addition, MoO3, Ni/MoO3 and
Co/MoO3 represented catalysts reduced at 300 °C.
2.3. Characterization of catalysts
2.3.1. Nitrogen adsorption
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of the catalysts were mea-
sured at ꢀ196 °C using a Quantachrome Autosorb IQ instrument.
Prior to these measurements, the sample was loaded in a glass tube
and outgassed at 200 °C under vacuum for 8 h to remove any vola-
tile adsorbates from the surface. The resulting adsorption iso-
therms were used to calculate the specific surface area (S) by the
Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. The average pore volume
(Vp) and the pore diameter (dp) was obtained using the Barrett-
Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method.
2.3.2. In-situ X-ray diffraction
In-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a
Rigaku Smartlab instrument, using a Cu Ka monochromatized radi-
ation source. Diffraction patterns were collected in the range of 2h
from 5° to 90° with a scan speed of 8° minꢀ1, operated at 40 kV and
100 mA. Prior to test, the samples were placed into the reaction
chamber and reduced in flowing H2 (40 mL minꢀ1) at correspond-
ing temperature for 2 h, and then the diffraction patterns were
collected.
In the present work, we select dibenzofuran (DBF) as the lignin
model compound [34–38] and focus on the influence of Co(Ni) over
MoO3 on the catalytic activity of catalysts during the hydrogenol-
ysis of DBF to biphenyl at atmospheric hydrogen pressure. First,
active sites on pure MoO3 for the reaction was determined by alter-
ing the reduction temperature of MoO3 to expose the diverse Mo
species, combined with the characterization techniques such as
XPS and in-situ XRD. Then, supported catalysts were synthesized
and then used to investigate the activity in order to identify the
structural-activity relationship of catalysts as evidenced by in-
situ XRD, in-situ FT-IR, Raman, XPS, H2-TPR and NH3-TPD. As a
result, an insight into a possible reaction mechanism was proposed
to illustrate the role of the surface Mo5+ and promotional Co(Ni) on
catalytic performance over the present catalysts. Developing
2.3.3. Temperature-programmed desorption
The acidic properties of catalysts were characterized by using
the temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD).
Experiments were performed on a CHEMBET-3000 chemisorption
instrument. Prior to the experiments, the calcined samples