2692 Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 75, No. 12 (2002)
© 2002 The Chemical Society of Japan
Table 1. Optical Rotations, Retention Times and Enantiomeric Excesses of Compounds 4–7
Compound Yield/%b) [α]Da) (c 1, MeOH) Retention time/min Enantiomeric excessb)
4
5
6
7
63
—
—
—
68 (50)
68 (45)
71 (65)
+18.2
+88.3
+ 3.2
5.58:6.07
5.12:6.82
5.42:6.13
94 (68)
90 (56)
92 (84)
a) Optical rotations were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter. Enantiomeric ratios
were determined by HPLC analysis with a CHIRALPAK AS column (4.6 × 250 mm),
[254 nm, 0.6 mL/min, ethanol-hexane (1:1). b) Numbers in brackets refer to the results of
the previously described methodology.9b
the enantioselective synthesis of tetramic acids,” 17th Internation-
al Symposium “Synthesis in Organic Chemistry”, Oxford, UK,
July 2001, Abstr, No. P20.
10 M. Petroliagi and O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, J. Heterocycl.
Chem., 38, 917 (2001).
11 R. Noyori, in “Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic
Synthesis,” ed by John Wiley and Sons, United States of America
(1994).
building blocks in the C-acylation reaction would also open the
possibility of using bases strong enough to abstract a proton
from different types of carbonyl systems with a functional α-
CH group acting not only as an electron-withdrawing group
(CN), but also as an electron donor. The structures of com-
pounds 4–7 have been elucidated by elemental analyses as
well as NMR and FT-IR Spectroscopy.12
In conclusion, we successfully synthesized N-protected
4-amino functionalized but-2-enoates 4–7 in very good enanti-
omeric ratios by using a series of chiral N-acetyl α-amino ac-
ids and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole, a useful precursor in the syn-
thesis of peptides. Work currently in progress includes appli-
cations of the proposed methodology in the synthesis of func-
tionalized 4-amino-3-hydroxy- and 3,4-dihydroxybut-2-
enoates as well as their cyclization reactions to tetramic and
tetronic acids,13 respectively. Additionaly, the catalytic asym-
metric hydrogenation of the above-reported functionalized
4-hydroxybut-2-enoates to “statine-homologues” is under in-
vestigation.
12 Typical analytical and spectroscopic data: 1H/13C-NMR
spectra (J in Hz; 300 and 75 MHz) were measured in CDCl3. 4:
71% yield; mp 126–127 °C; IR (KBr) 3300 (NH), 2223 (CN),
1656/1581 (CO), and 1544 cm−1 (CwC) ; 1H NMR δ 1.37 (3H, t, J
= 7.5, CH3), 2.08 (3H, s, COCH3), 4.36 (4H, m, COOCH2CH3
and CH2NHCOCH3), 5.99 (1H, s, NH); 13C NMR δ 13.9 (C-7),
22.6 (C-9), 41.6 (C-1), 62.9 (C-6), 80.2 (C-3), 113.6 (C-4), 170.2
(C-5), 170.7 (C-8), 185.9 (C-2); Anal. Calcd for C9H12N2O4: C,
50.94; H, 5.66; N, 13.21%; Found: C, 50.77; H, 5.43; N, 13.43%.
5: 63% yield; mp 111–112 °C; IR (KBr) 3286 (NH), 2221 (CN),
1
1649/1588 (CO), and 1553 cm−1(CwC) ; H NMR δ 1.36 (3H, t,
CH2CH3), 1.48 (3H, d, J = 6.9, CH3), 2.03 (3H, s, COCH3), 4.34
(2H, q, J = 6.9, CH2CH3), 4.91 (1H, q, CH3CH), 5.90 (1H, s,
NH); 13C NMR δ 13.9 (C-7), 18.2 (CH3), 22.6 (C-9), 48.3 (C-1),
62.9 (C-6), 79.3 (C-3), 113.6 (C-4), 170.0 (C-5), 170.5 (C-8),
190.0 (C-2); Anal. Calcd for C10H14N2O4: C, 53.10; H, 6.19; N,
12.39%; Found: C, 53.11; H, 6.22; N, 12.47%. 6: 68% yield; mp
146–147 °C; IR (KBr) 3304 (NH), 2223 (CN), 1654/1592 (CO),
We thank the National Technical University of Athens for fi-
nancial support (project “Archimides”). We also thank Ms. V.
Skouridou (National Technical University of Athens,
Biotechnology Laboratory) for recording the IR spectra.
1
and 1540 cm−1 (CwC) ; H NMR δ 1.35 (3H, t, COOCH2CH3),
References
1.99 (3H, s, COCH3), 3.05 (1H, dd, J = 6.9, CH2), 3.14 (1H, dd, J
= 6.9, CH2), 4.33 (2H, q, J = 6.9, CH2CH3), 5.14 (1H, q, J = 6.9,
CH), 5.81 (1H, d, J = 6.9, NH), 7.20–7.37 (5H, m, PhH); 13C
NMR δ 13.9 (C-7), 22.6 (C-9), 38.3 (PhCH2), 53.5 (C-1), 62.9 (C-
6), 80.6 (C-3), 113.5 (C-4), 134.8/129.1/129.0/127.7 (phenyl car-
bons), 170.0 (C-5), 170.4 (C-8), 188.2 (C-2); Anal. Calcd for
C16H18N2O4: C, 63.58; H, 5.96; N, 9.27%; Found: C, 63.47; H,
5.78; N, 9.41. 7: 67% yield; mp 96–97 °C; IR (KBr) 3318 (NH),
1
P. Q. Huang, J. L. Ye, Z. Chen, Y. P. Ruan, and J. X. Gao,
Synth. Commun., 28, 417 (1998).
D. Enders, R. Grobner, G. Raabe, and J. Runsink,
Synthesis, 1996, 941.
2
3
D. Ma, J. Ma, W. Ding, and L. Dai, Tetrahedron: Asymme-
try, 7, 2365 (1996).
4
G. Sauve, N. Le Berre, and B. Zacharie, J. Org. Chem., 55,
1
2221 (CN), 1656/1582 (CO), and 1546 cm−1 (CwC) ; H NMR δ
3002 (1990).
5
M. Vaillancourt, B. Vanasse, E. Cohen, and G. Sauve,
0.98 (3H, d, J = 6.9, CH3), 0.99 (3H, d, J = 6.9, CH3), 1.36 (3H, t,
COOCH2CH3), 1.60–1.69 (3H, m, (CH3)2CHCH2), 2.04 (3H, s,
COCH3), 4.32 (2H, q, J = 6.9, COOCH2CH3), 4.89 (1H, q, J =
6.9, CH), 5.83 (1H, d, J = 7.2, NH), 13.9 (1H, br s, OH); 13C-
NMR δ 13.9 (C-7), 21.5 ((CH3)2CHCH2), 22.7 (C-9), 22.8
((CH3)2CHCH2), 24.8 ((CH3)2CHCH2), 41.5 ((CH3)2CHCH2),
51.1 (C-1), 62.8 (C-6), 79.7 (C-3), 113.8 (C-4), 170.1 (C-5), 170.5
(C-8), 190.0 (C-4); Anal. Calcd. for C13H20N2O4: C, 58.21, H,
7.46; N, 10.45%; Found: C, 57.99; H, 7.47; N, 10.37%.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 3, 1169 (1993).
6
A. Detsi, J. Markopoulos, and O. Igglessi-Markopoulou,
Chem. Commun., 1996, 1323.
M. Petroliagi and O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1, 23, 3543 (1997).
G. Athanasellis, E. Gavrielatos, and O. Igglessi-
Markopoulou, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 38, 1203 (2001).
a) G. Athanasellis, E. Gavrielatos, and O. Igglessi-
7
8
9
Markopoulou, Synlett., 2001, 1653. b) G. Athanasellis, E.
Gavrielatos, and O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, “A novel method for
13 G. Athanasellis, E. Gavrielatos, and O. Igglessi-
Markopoulou, Anticancer Res., 21, 1579 (2001).