1
68
A. Ligresti et al. / Pharmacological Research 66 (2012) 163–169
needed to establish the functional, i.e. agonistic or antagonistic,
nature of the interaction of yangonin with the CB1 receptor. Sur-
prisingly, all compounds were nearly inactive at inhibiting FAAH
and MAGL activities, the two major catabolic enzymes involved
in endocannabinoid degradation. FAAH and MAGL are typical
serine-hydrolase presenting slight differences in their catalytic
mechanism. In fact, while AEA hydrolysis is activated by a lysine
residue, which acts as base [30], the hydrolysis of 2-AG is facili-
tated by proximal cysteine amino acids, as demonstrated by crystal
structure studies [31]. Accordingly, lipophilic sulfhydryl-reagents
such as maleimides [32,33] and isothiazolinones [34], as well as
disulfiram [35], are effective inhibitors of this enzyme. Recently,
an analogue of the known -lactone serine hydrolase inhibitor
tetrahydrolipstatin was also found to inhibit MAGL in vitro and to
possess antinociceptive activity in vivo [36]. On the other hand, the
detoxification of kavalactones in humans is postulated to involve
an electrophilic opening of the lactone ring by the sulfhydryl group
of glutathione (GSH) [37,38]. In fact, the observed hepatotoxic-
ity of commercial kava extracts has been explained by the lack
of plant-derived GSH in such preparations. Whether the reactiv-
ity of kavalactones towards critical sulfhydryl groups accounts for
their slight enhancement of the MAGL-catalysed hydrolysis of 2-
AG, observed here, requires further investigation. During the assay,
such a reaction, if reversible, could protect the enzyme from par-
tial oxidative inactivation by contaminants in the assay buffer and
cell homogenate. Such a protective mechanism, involving redox-
sensitive cysteine thiol groups, has recently been proposed for
kavalactones [39].
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, through the screening of five major natu-
ral kavalactones and nine synthetic derivatives on cannabinoid
receptors and endocannabinoid metabolic enzymes, we identi-
fied yangonin as a unique and selective, though not very potent,
CB1 receptor ligand. The sub-micromolar affinity concentration
determined here is within the range found for the GABAA affin-
ity of some of the other kavalactones. The significance of our
results is twofold. First, the CB receptor affinity of yangonin might
1
indicate the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in the
complex human psychopharmacology of the traditional kava drink
and also in the anxiolytic preparations obtained from the kava
plant. Indeed, if at all due to CB -mediated effects, these anxi-
1
olytic effects would indicate for yangonin an agonist action, since
CB1 inverse agonists/antagonists such as rimonabant and tarana-
bant have been shown to cause anxiogenic effects in humans [16].
Secondly, yangonin provides a novel, versatile and synthetically
accessible structural scaffold for the design of new cannabinoid
receptor ligands. Further pharmacological, including functional and
behavioral, studies on the cannabimimetic activity of yangonin and
other kavalactones as well as with a larger number of synthetic
analogues, are thus warranted.
Acknowledgement
We thank PhytoLab GmbH for the supply of the natural kavalac-
tones.
One interesting issue is the question of whether or not the
in vitro micromolar concentrations at which yangonin interacts
Appendix A. Supplementary data
with CB , determined here, might be relevant in vivo. Among
1
kavalactones, only the human pharmacokinetics of kavain has been
studied so far [40]. One and four hours after oral administration of a
single dose of 800 mg (± )-kavain, the blood serum concentration of
this compound was 0.043 M and 0.17 M, respectively. However,
the effective total daily dose reported from clinical trials with com-
mercial kava extract formulations is 60–240 mg of kavalactones
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[
[
1] Lewin L. Ueber Piper methysticum (kawa-kawa). Die Berliner Klinische Wochen-
schrift 1886;23:7–10.
2] Gajdusek DC. Recent observations on the use of kava in the new hebrides.
Ethnopharmacologic Search for Psychoactive Drugs 1967:119–25.
[
11]. On the other hand, traditional kava drinkers typically con-
sume 0.1–0.5 l of the beverage, which is made by mixing ∼150 g
dried kava root with 1 l water, to afford approximately 1 l of kava
drink. Assuming that the total kavalactone-content in the root is
[3] Lebot VM, Lindstrom L. Kava – the pacific elixir: the definitive guide to its
ethnobotany, history, and chemistry. Healing Art Press; 1997. p. 255.
1
2
0% and the six major kavalactones are present in equal amounts,
50–1250 mg yangonin might be ingested orally during a “kava ses-
[
4] YN S. In: SY N, editor. Kava: from ethnology to pharmacology: CRC Press; 2004.
[5] Schubel K. Chemistry and pharmacology of kawa-kawa (Piper methysticum).
sion”. This dose could provide serum concentrations of yangonin
Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry 1924;43:766B.
[
6] Sarris J, Kavanagh DJ, Adams J, Bone K, Byrne G. Kava anxiety depression spec-
trum study (kadss): a mixed methods RCT using an aqueous extract of Piper
methysticum. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2009;17:176–8.
[7] Prescott J, Jamieson D, Emdur N, Duffield P. Acute effects of kava on measures
of cognitive performance, physiological function and mood. Drug and Alcohol
Review 1993;12:49–57.
high enough to affect the CB receptor in the central nervous system
1
and, as a result, contribute to the overall psychopharmacological
profile of the kava drink.
Apart from phytocannabinoids from C. sativa, there are only a
few exogenous regulators of the endocannabinoid system of natu-
ral origin [41]. A skin irritant polyyne fatty alcohol, falcarinol, was
[
8] Cairney S, Maruff P, Clough AR, Collie A, Currie J, Currie BJ. Saccade and cognitive
impairment associated with kava intoxication. Human Psychopharmacology
2003;18:525–33.
recently found to be a covalent antagonist of the human CB recep-
1
[
9] Thompson R, Ruch W, Hasenohrl RU. Enhanced cognitive performance and
cheerful mood by standardized extracts of Piper methysticum (kava-kava).
Human Psychopharmacology 2004;19:243–50.
10] Stevinson C, Huntley A, Ernst E. A systematic review of the safety of kava extract
in the treatment of anxiety. Drug Safety 2002;25:251–61.
11] Clouatre DL. Kava kava: examining new reports of toxicity. Toxicological Letters
2004;150:85–96.
tor (K = 0.594 M) [42]. Lipophilic isobutylamides from Echinacea
i
purpurea (L.) Moench, and Echinacea angustifolia DC, both widely
[
used herbal medicines, were shown bind to the human CB receptor
2
(
K ∼ 0.060 M) [43]. The sesquiterpene -caryophyllene, present
i
[
in many spices and food plants, and also in the essential oil of
C. sativa, is an agonist of the human CB2 receptor (K = 0.155 M)
[12] Teschke RS, Schweitzer JI. Kava hepatotoxicity in traditional and modern use:
the presumed Pacific kava paradox hypothesis revisited. British Journal of Clin-
ical Pharmacology 2011.
[13] Sarris J, LaPorte E, Schweitzer I. Kava: a comprehensive review of efficacy,
safety, and psychopharmacology. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psy-
chiatry 2011;45:27–35.
i
[
44]. Furthermore, a quinonemethide triterpene, pristimerin was
shown to be an inhibitor of MAGL from rat brain (K = 0.093 M)
i
[
45]. Recent studies have also revealed that several naturally occur-
ring (iso)flavones, including kaempferol, biochanin A, daidzein
and genistein, inhibit rodent and human FAAH preparations
with IC50 values at micromolar concentrations [46,47]. Remark-
ably, yangonin, which possesses an extensive conjugated double
bond system, bears little structural resemblance to these diverse
[
14] Siméoni PLV. Identification of factors determining kavalactone content and
chemotype in kava (Piper methysticum Forst. F.). Biochemical Systematics and
Ecology 2002;30:11.
[
15] Lasme P, Davrieux F, Montet D, Lebot V. Quantification of kavalactones and
determination of kava (Piper methysticum) chemotypes using near-infrared
reflectance spectroscopy for quality control in vanuatu. Journal of Agricultural
and Food Chemistry 2008;56:4976–81.
“
phytocannabinoids”.