C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. Neurogenesis of human skeletal muscle fibers by Nz. (a) Single
muscle fibers isolated from the abductor hallucis muscle and (b-c)
immunocytochemical analysis of mononucleates and satellite cells after
treatment with 2 µM Nz for 7 days (bar ) 50 µm). (d) Synaptic vesicle
recycling of mononucleates after treatment with 2 µM Nz for 7 days using
FM1-43 (error ) SD).
Figure 2. Neurogenesis of C2C12 myoblasts by Nz. C2C12 cells were
treated (a) without and (b-h) with 2 µM Nz for 7 days. The upregulation
of neuron-specific markers in Nz-treated C2C12 cells is visualized by
immunocytochemistry (bar ) 50 µm) (see Supporting Information for
Western blot analysis).
is known to be involved in inducing neuronal differentiation in rat
PC12 and neuroepithelial cells,15 was upregulated by Nz. However,
the expression of key regulators of myogenesis, such as MyoD,
Myf-5, and myogenin,16 remained unchanged during the early stages
of Nz treatment, suggesting that C2C12 cells develop a neuronal
phenotype without suppressing their own potential to differentiate
into muscle fibers under permissive conditions, such as fusion with
neighboring cells in culture.
with 100 ng/mL nerve growth factor (a well-characterized model
of neurogenesis).12 On the basis of immunocytochemical analysis
and FM1-43 studies, 40-50% myoblasts were converted to a
neuronal phenotype by Nz.
The conversion of differentiated myotubes to neurogenic cells
is an attractive prospect because it would suggest that neurogenic
cells can be derived from adult skeletal muscle fibers. The
differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts into myotubes is an in vitro
model of skeletal muscle myogenesis. Since C2C12 myotubes are
not directly converted to neurogenic cells by Nz, we attempted a
two-step procedure to differentiate myotubes into neurogenic cells.
Myotubes differentiated from C2C12 myoblasts were first treated
with 10 µM myoservin to induce cellularization of myotubes.13
Mononucleates isolated from cellularized myotubes were then
incubated with 2 µM Nz for 7 days in the absence of myoseverin.
The differentiated cells were confirmed to have neurogenic proper-
ties by immunocytochemical and Western blot analyses of neuron-
specific protein expression and synaptic vesicle recycling studies
using FM1-43 (see Supporting Information). These studies show
that the Nz-treated mononucleates derived from C2C12 myotubes
possess a similar neurogenic potential to Nz-treated C2C12 myo-
blasts.
The results obtained from experiments using mouse myotubes
prompted us to test if Nz can be used to generate neurogenic cells
from human skeletal muscle. For these studies, single muscle fibers
were isolated from the abductor hallucis muscle.14 The single muscle
fibers were treated with 15 µM myoseverin for 20 h in order to
obtain mononucleates. The isolated mononucleates were further
incubated with 2 µM Nz for 7 days. Alternatively, the single muscle
fibers were cultured to produce satellite cells which are quiescent,
mononuclear muscle cells residing between the sarcolemma and
basement membrane of the muscle fibers. The satellite cells were
treated with 2 µM Nz for 7 days. Mononucleates and the satellite
cells treated with Nz developed a neuronal phenotype on the basis
of immunocytochemical analysis and synaptic vesicle recycling
studies (Figure 3).
In conclusion, we have developed the first small molecule that
can induce neurogenesis of non-pluripotent myoblasts and the cells
derived from mature, human skeletal muscle. These studies build
upon recent research illustrating the value of chemical approaches
for providing tools that differentiate lineage-committed cells into
other cell types.9c
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a grant of the
NRL program (MOST/KOSEF). S.-K.K. and G.-H.K. thank the BK
21 program (KRF).
Supporting Information Available: Preparation of a library and
cell experiments. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) Kim, J.-H.; Auerbach, J. M.; Rodriguez-Gomez, J. A.; Velasco, I.; Gavin,
D.; Lumelsky, N.; Lee, S. H.; Nguyen, J.; Sanchez-Pernaute, R.;
Bankiewicz, K.; McKay, R. Nature 2002, 418, 50.
(2) Swijnenburg, R. J.; Tanaka, M.; Vogel, H.; Baker, J.; Kofidis, T.;
Gunawan, F.; Lebl, D. R.; Caffarelli, A. D.; de Bruin, J. L.; Fedoseyeva,
E. V.; Robbins, R. C. Circulation 2005, 112 (9 Suppl), I166.
(3) Clark, D.; Frisen, J. Curr. Opin. Genet. DeV. 2001, 11, 575.
(4) Wichterle, H.; Lieberam, I.; Porter, J. A.; Jessell, T. M. Cell 2002, 110,
385.
(5) Mendelsohn, C.; Ruberte, E.; Chambon. P. DeV. Biol. 1992, 152, 50.
(6) (a) Ding, S.; Wu, T. Y. H.; Brinker, A.; Peters, E. C.; Hur, W.; Gray, N.
S.; Schultz, P. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 7632. (b)
Warashina, M.; Min, K. H.; Kuwabara, T.; Huynh, A.; Gage, F. H.;
Schultz, P. G.; Ding. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 591.
(7) Golebiowski, A.; Klopfenstein, S. R.; Portlock, D. E. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2003, 5, 273.
(8) Sarshar, S.; Siev, D.; Mjalli, A. M. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 835.
(9) (a) Yaffe, D.; Saxel, O. Nature 1977, 270, 725. (b) Katagiri, T.;
Yamaguchi, A.; Komaki, M.; Abe, E.; Takahashi, N.; Ikeda, T.; Rosen,
V.; Wozney, J. M.; Fujisawa-Sehara, A.; Suda, T. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 127,
1755. (c) Chen, S.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, X.; Schultz, P. G.; Ding, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 410.
(10) Watanabe, Y.; Kameoka, S.; Gopalakrishnan, V.; Aldape, K. D.; Pan, Z.
Z.; Lang, F. F.; Majumder, S. Genes DeV. 2004, 18, 889.
(11) Betz, W. J.; Bewick, G. S. Science 1992, 255, 200.
Understanding the mode of action of Nz should give insight into
the mechanisms involved in neurogenesis and assist the develop-
ment of other novel agents to induce neuronal differentiation. We
undertook gene expression profiling in C2C12 myoblasts treated
with Nz to assess the effects of Nz using mouse 20K DNA chips.
It is apparent that Nz preferentially upregulates genes involved in
neurogenesis over other differentiation pathways (see Supporting
Information). In particular, B-cell translocation gene 2 (Btg2), which
(12) Dichter, M. A.; Tischler, A. S.; Greene, L. A. Nature 1977, 268, 501.
(13) Rosania, G. R.; Chang, Y. T.; Perez, O.; Sutherlin, D.; Dong, H.; Lockhart,
D. J.; Schultz, P. G. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 304.
(14) Bonavaud, S.; Agbulut, O.; D’Honneur, G.; Nizard, R.; Mouly, V.; Butler-
Browne, G. In Vitro Cell DeV. Biol. Anim. 2002, 38, 66.
(15) Iacopetti, P.; Michelini, M.; Stuckmann, I.; Oback, B.; Aaku-Saraste, E.;
Huttner, W. B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 4639.
(16) Molkentin, J. D.; Olson, E. N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93,
9366.
JA072817Z
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 30, 2007 9259