Elkazaz and Jones
JOCArticle
formed. The anthraquinone chromophore is not regenerated
until the endoperoxide is reduced, which occurs after photo-
lysis is stopped. Thus, the procedure allows oxidation of a
single ortho methyl even where other oxidizable methyls are
present.
The mechanism of the photo-oxidation was probed by
attempting to quench the reaction with dibutyl sulfide, a
known 1O2 quencher.49 The sulfide had no effect on the rate
of formation of 7 by photolysis of 3. This observation rules
out path b (Scheme 2). Therefore, the most likely mechanism
for the reaction is trapping of an intermediate 1,4-diradical
by molecular oxygen (path a) .
The reaction sequence described above could easily be
carried out in a one-pot reaction. The anthraquinone was
dissolved in benzene, O2 was bubbled through the solution
for 15 min, and then, with a continuous flow of O2, the
solution was photolyzed until TLC indicated complete con-
sumption of the anthraquinone. The oxygen purge was then
removed and the reaction mixture diluted with ethanol and
either NaBH4 or thiourea added. Typically, the reduction
was complete in less than 1 h when NaBH4 was used and in a
few hours when thiourea was the reducing agent, though
stirring overnight did not reduce yields. Solvent was removed
and the product purified by chromatography.
hydroxylation developed was used in the first synthesis of
90-hydroxyaloesaponarin II.
Experimental Section
General Procedure for Photochemical Hydroxylation. A 0.003 M
solution of the 1-methyl-9,10-anthraquinone derivative in benzene
was prepared. Oxygen was bubbled through the solution for 20 min
and then while the solution was irradiated at 419 nm. The reaction
was followed by TLC until the starting anthraquinone was com-
pletely consumed. The solution was concentrated immediately in
vacuo in the dark. The crude endoperoxide thus obtained was then
reduced using one of the methods listed below. Safety note:
peroxides are unstable and can explode. On the scale prepared, none
of the endoperoxides described above exhibited such behavior, but
caution should be exercised when repeating these procedures.
Method A. The crude endoperoxide was dissolved in ethanol
and cooled to 0 °C and 0.5 equiv of NaBH4 added. The resulting
mixture was not allowed to stir more than 30 min. It was
important not to stir the reaction longer as continued exposure
to the NaBH4 caused significant product degradation. The
reaction was quenched with a dilute solution of aq HCl which
was then extracted 3ꢀ with EtOAc. The combined organic
layers were washed with 2 ꢀ 30 mL portions of brine, dried
over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude
1-hydroxymethyl-9,10-anthraquinone was purified by column
chromatography over silica gel.
The scope of the reaction was examined by using the
photochemical hydroxylation to synthesize 90-hydroxyaloe-
saponarin II, 21, a naturally occurring polyketide.50-52
Aloesaponarin II (23) was prepared following a literature
synthesis.53 Neither 23 nor a related structure, methyl ether
22,53 gave any hydroxylation products when irradiated in the
presence of oxygen for 6 h. Both 22 and 23 were recovered
unchanged after photolysis. As expected, hydrogen abstrac-
tion from the ortho OH was faster than that from the ortho
methyl, allowing the ortho-OH to serve as an internal
quencher.
Acylation of both phenolic groups in 23 with propionyl
chloride gave dipropionate 24 (Scheme 6). Irradiation of 24
gave endoperoxide 25. Treatment of 25 with thiourea and
K2CO3 in methanol reduced the peroxide and cleaved the
propionate protecting groups to give 21 in 90% yield over
two steps.
Method B. The crude endoperoxide was dissolved in ethanol
and 5 equiv of thiourea added to the solution. The progress of
the reaction was monitored by TLC and was usually found to be
complete in 30 min. However, stirring for 12 h or more in the
dark did not cause degradation of the product. In the case of 22,
5 equiv of K2CO3 was also added. The reaction mixture was
added to brine and extracted with 3 ꢀ 20 mL EtOAc. The
combined organic layers were washed with (2 ꢀ 30 mL) portions
of 1 N HCl, satd aq K2CO3, and brine. The organic layer was
dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The
crude product was purified by column chromatography over
silica gel with hexane/EtOAc (3:1) to afford the corresponding
anthraquinone-1-methanol derivative as a pale yellow or yellow
solid.
Endoperoxide 7. The crude endoperoxide was obtained by
evaporation of solvent following photolysis. The endoperoxide
decomposed on all attempts at purification, but a 1H NMR
and MS could be obtained on the crude product. 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.39 (1H, bs), 5.21 (1H, d, J = 15.3), 5.61
(1H, d, J = 15.3), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 9), 7.59 (3H, m), 7.71 (1H, m),
8.05 (1H, d, J = 9), 8.20 (1H, m).
Conclusion
1-(Hydroxymethyl)anthracene-9,10-dione (18).54 Method A:
An easy, one-pot hydroxylation of 1-alkyl-9,10-anthra-
quinones has been developed. The photoinduced hydroxyla-
tion proceeds through an isolable endoperoxide produced
when an intermediate 1,4-diradical is trapped by molecular
oxygen. Singlet oxygen is not involved in the oxidation.
When the wavelength of excitation is sufficiently long, the
endoperoxide is isolable and relatively stable. This may be a
general method for the isolation of endoperoxide adducts of
photochemically produced diradicals. The method tolerates
the presence of acylated oxygen groups on the quinone rings
but not an unprotected ortho phenol. The photochemical
1
69.7 mg/65%. Method B: 37.5 mg/70%. mp 155-156 °C; H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.78 (1H, t, J = 7.4), 5.03 (2H, d,
J = 7.4), 7.77 (4H, m), 8.28 (2H, m), 8.36 (1H, dd, J = 1.5, 6.07);
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 64.0, 125.9, 126.4, 126.6, 130.3,
131.7, 133.1, 133.2, 133.22, 133.24, 134.1, 134.6, 142.7, 182.0,
185.2; HRMS calcd for C15H10O3Naþ 261.0522 [M þ Naþ],
found 261.0519.
1-(Hydroxymethyl)-3-methylanthracene-9,10-dione (19).
Method A: 7 mg/65%. Method B: 8.8 mg/55%. mp 162-
163 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.54 (3H, s), 3.87
(1H, t, J = 7.3), 4.97 (2H, d, J = 7.2), 7.65 (1H, m), 7.78
(2H, t, J = 4.4), 8.16 (1H, m), 8.26 (2H, m); 13C NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.8, 29.73 65.1, 126.9, 127.4, 128.0,
129.1, 132.8, 134.0, 134.2, 135.2, 136.7, 143.8, 145.7, 183.4,
186.0; HRMS calcd for C16H12O3Naþ 275.0678 [M þ Naþ],
found 275.0678.
(49) Gu, C. L.; Foote, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6060–6063.
(50) Cui, H. X.; Shaaban, K. A.; Schiebel, M.; Qin, S.; Laatsch, H. World
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 419–421.
(51) Cui, H.; Shaaban, K. A.; Qin, S. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
2006, 22, 1377–1379.
(52) Kalaitzis, J. A.; Moore, B. S. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 1419–1422.
(53) Roberge, G.; Brassard, P. Synthesis 1979, 148–150.
(54) Ramanathan, V.; Tilak, B. D.; Venkataraman, K. Proc. Indian Acad.
Sci., Sect. 1953, 38A, 161–175.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 2, 2010 415