Please do not adjust margins
Chemical Science
Page 6 of 7
ARTICLE
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5919-5921; (d) A. C.
Journal Name
reduction potentials of the substrates investigated here. To
Hernandez-Perez and S. K. Collins, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2013, 52, 12696-12700; (e) S. Paria and O. Reiser,
ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 2477-2483; (f) Q. M. Kainz, C. D.
Matier, A. Bartoszewicz, S. L. Zultanski, J. C. Peters and G. C.
Fu, Science 2016, 351, 681-684.
(a) A. Gualandi, M. Marchini, L. Mengozzi, M. Natali, M.
Lucarini, P. Cernoni and P. G. Cozzi, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 5927-
5931. (b) J. Zhang, D. Campolo, F. Dumur, P. Xiao, J. P.
Fouassier, D. Gigmes and J. Lalevée J. Polym. Sci. A Polym.
Chem. 2015, 53, 42-49; (c) J. Zhang, D. Campolo, F. Dumur, P.
Xiao, J. P. Fouassier, D. Gigmes and J. Lalevée J. Polym. Sci. A
Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 2247-2253.
(a) A. M. McDaniel, H. -W. Tseng, N. H. Damrauer and M. P.
Shores, Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 7981-7991; (b) S. M.
Stevenson, M. P. Shores and E. M. Ferreira, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6506-6510; (c) R. F. Higgins, S. M. Fatur, S.
G. Shepard, S. M. Stevenson, D. J. Boston, E. M. Ferreira, N.
H. Damrauer, A. K. Rappé and M. P. Shores, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2016, 138, 5451-5464.
date, there is no observed evidenceDoOfI: t1h0e.10h39ig/Ch6eSrCe0n33e0r3gBy
state (i.e., 4T2) using picosecond spectroscopy, so we believe
this 4T2 state is likely insignificant in this photocatalytic
system. (b) For a related reference discussing the 4T2 state in
Cr(acac)3-type complexes, see: J. N. Schrauben, K. L. Dillman,
W. F. Beck and J. K. McCusker, Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 405-410.
(c) For a recent example of a Cr(III) complex that takes
advantage of strong-field ligands to establish a large energy
8
9
gap between the E/2T1 and the T2 states, see: S. Otto, M.
Grabolle, C. Förster, C. Kreitner, U. Resch-Genger and K.
Heinze, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11572-11576.
24 In other examples, triphenylpyrilium, 1,4-dicyanobenzene,
and 9,10-dicyanoanthracene have been observed to oxidize
chalcone derivatives for intramolecular nucleophilic attack.
See: (a) S. Kar and S. Lahiri, Ind. J. Chem. 2001, 40B, 1121-
1124; (b) G. Pandey, A. Krishna and G. Kumaraswamy,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 4615-4616; (c) M. J. Climent, H.
García, S. Iborra, M. A. Miranda and J. Primo, Heterocycles
1989, 29, 115-121.
2
4
10 All reduction/oxidation potentials are in V vs. SCE in CH3CN 25 (a) R. A. Caldwell and M. Singh, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
unless otherwise noted. Those measured in CH3NO2 are also
vs. SCE.
11 S. Lin, M. A. Ischay, C. G. Fry and T. P. Yoon, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 19350-19353.
12 M. A. Cismesia and T. P. Yoon, Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 5426-5434.
5139-5140; (b) R. A. Caldwell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92,
3229-3230; (c) static emission spectrum of 4-
methoxychalcone is provided in the Supporting Information.
26 Vinylcyclobutane 6 was also detected in the crude NMR
spectra of incomplete reactions.
A
13 N. L. Bauld, D. J. Bellville, B. Harirchian, K. T. Lorenz, R. A. 27 The allylic hydroperoxide byproduct (ref 18) was formed
Pabon, D. W. Reynolds, D. D. Wirth, H. -S. Chiou and B. K.
Marsh, Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 371-378.
14 (a) C. K. Prier, D. A. Rankic and D. W. C. MacMillan, Chem.
Rev. 2013, 113, 5322-5363; (b) J. Xuan and W. -J. Xiao,
more prominently in this specific experiment, leading to the
diminshed yield as compared to the full cycloaddition. No
rearrangement occurred in the absence of light; trace
cyclohexene 5 was formed in the absence of catalyst.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6828-6838 (c) J. M. R. 28 For examples of cyclobutane cycloreversion, see: (a) F. D.
Narayanam and C. R. J. Stephenson, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011,
40, 102-113; (d) R. A. Angnes, Z. Li, C. R. D. Correia and G. B.
Hammond, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 9152-9167.
Lewis and M. Kojima, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8664-
8670; (b) ref 3b; (c) ref 5.
29 The reverse trapping experiments were also performed. See
Supporting Information for details.
15 For a list of select examples, see the Supporting Information.
16 We note here that in our experience the reduction potentials 30 (a) D. W. Reynolds, B. Harirchan, H. -S. Chiou, B. K. Marsh
can be sensitive to the conditions of measurement (solvent,
additives, etc.) and thus should only be used as a general
guide. Reduction potentials cited from the literature are
compiled in the Supporting Information.
and N. L. Bauld, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1989, 2, 57-88; (b) T. Kim,
R. J. Pye and N. L. Bauld, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6285-
6290.
31 (a) F. Toda, K. Tanaka and M. Kato, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 1315-1318; (b) M. D’Auria and A. Vantaggi,
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 2523-2528; (c) ref 22a.
17 Intermolecular photochemical [2+2] cycloadditions of acyclic
chalcone derivatives and related α,β-unsaturated carbonyls
are rare due to the propensity of these species for cis/trans- 32 The bifurcation of [4+2] vs. [2+2]/VCBR in electron transfer
isomerization upon photoexcitation. See: (a) S. Poplata, A.
Tröster, Y. -Q. Zou and T. Bach, Chem. Rev. 2016, in press;
processes has been the subject of intense investigation. See
the Supporting Information for a list of select studies.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00723; (b) P. Margaretha, in 33 S. Chatterjee, S. Kar, S. Lahiri and S. Basu, Spectrochim. Acta
Molecular and Supramolecular Photochemistry, Vol. 12, eds.
Part A 2004, 60, 1713-1718.
A. G. Griesbeck and J. Mattay, Marcel Dekker, New York, 34 (a) P. Wang and S. Wu, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
2005, Ch. 8; (c) A. K. F. Albertson and J. -P. Lumb, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 2204-2208.
1994, 77, 127-131; (b) Y. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89,
3799-3805; (c) R. J. DeVoe, M. R. V. Sahyun and E. Schmidt,
Can. J. Chem. 1989, 67, 1565-1575; (d) S. Kar, S. Aich, S. Basu
and S. Lahiri, Res. Chem. Intermed. 1999, 25, 903-913.
35 (a) S. Kar and S. Lahiri, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1995,
957-958; (b) P. D. Kranz, A. G. Griesbeck, R. Alle, R. Perez-
Ruiz, J. M. Neudörfl, K. Meerholz and H. -G. Schmalz, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6000-6004.
18 When the reaction was performed where O2 was present, we
also observed in very minor quantities (average <5% yield)
the formation of an allylic hydroperoxide byproduct.
19 In sample cases (e.g., 16, 17), this method provided
noticeably enhanced dienophile reactivity over conventional
activation techniques. See the Supporting Information for an
analysis.
20 Relative stereochemistry confirmed by NMR analysis.
21 In the interest of synthetic utility, the PMP group can be 37 For a review discussing allylic oxidation by O2, see: H. H.
oxidatively cleaved. See Supporting Information.
22 N. L. Bauld, Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 5307-5363.
36 W. Yueh and N. L. Bauld, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1996, 9, 529-
538.
1
Wasserman and J. L. Ives, Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 1825-1852.
38 In preliminary experiments, we have seen a nonlinear
dependence of the light intensity on the overall rate of
reactivity. This observation is also consistent with multiple
two-photon reaction pathways.
23 (a) The reduction potential value is measured based on the
emission from the 2E state. In an earlier report on the
[Cr(Ph2Phen)3]3+ complex (ref xx), there was an extra
emissive feature which was assigned to a 2T1 state that has a 39 F. Peng, R. E. Grote, R. M. Wilson and S. J. Danishefsky, Proc.
much shorter lifetime. This emission corresponds to a
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 110, 10904-10909.
Cr3+*/2+ E1/2 = +1.42 V in CH3NO2, still well below the
6 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins