13269-35-7Relevant articles and documents
Comparison of three S-β-CDs with different degrees of substitution for the chiral separation of 12 drugs in capillary electrophoresis
Wang, Zhaokun,Zhang, Qiongwen,Luo, Linda,Sun, Tiemin,Guo, Xingjie
, p. 558 - 565 (2017/08/26)
Three kinds of sulfated β-cyclodextrin (S-β-CD), including a single isomer, heptakis-6-sulfato-β-cyclodextrin (HS-β-CD), degree of substitution (DS) of 7, which was synthesized in our laboratory and another two commercialized randomly substituted mixtures, a sulfated β-cyclodextrin with DS of 7 to 11, as well as a highly sulfated-β-cyclodextrin with DS of 12 to 15, were used for the enantioresolution of 12 drugs (the β-blockers, phenethylamines, and anticholinergic agents) in capillary electrophoresis. The enantioseparation under varying concentrations of S-β-CD and background electrolyte pH were systematically investigated and compared. Based on the experimental results, the effect of the nature of S-β-CD and analyte structure on the enantioseparation is discussed.
Differential analgesic activity of the enantiomers of atropine derivatives does not correlate with their muscarinic subtype selectivity
Dei,Bartolini,Bellucci,Ghelardini,Gualtieri,Manetti,Romanelli,Scapecchi,Teodori
, p. 595 - 605 (2007/10/03)
The enantiomers of several tropic and p-substituted tropic acid esters related to atropine obtained by esterification under non-racemizing conditions after resolution of the corresponding racemic acids [(+)- and (-)-18, (+)- and (-)-19] are reported. They were tested in vitro on muscarinic subtype receptors and in vivo for their analgesic activity on mice. As in the case of the lead compound, R-(+)-hyoscyamine, these substances show enantioselectivity in analgesic tests, the eutomers being the R-(+) or R-(+)-p-substituted tropic acid derivatives. However, this property, which is a consequence of increased central release of ACh, seems unrelated to muscarinic subtype selectivity insofar as the compounds are unable to discriminate muscarinic subtype receptors. A possible explanation of these results which does not involve subtype selectivity is proposed, based on the recently developed concept of inverse agonism.