F. Couty et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 9180–9184
9183
with a series of carbon nucleophiles. The results of these
experiments are collected in Table 1.
tonation. Another experiment demonstrates the crucial
importance of the pKa value of the involved C-nucleo-
phile: the treatment of azetidinium ion 15 with the
sodium enolate of t-butyl acetate gives enol ether 25 as
the major product. This azetidinium substrate, unable
to produce an ylide, undergoes a Hofmann elimination
with this basic nucleophile (Scheme 3).
This first set of experiments demonstrated that this
reaction is indeed possible but seems to be restricted to
a narrow range of C-nucleophiles. In fact, only the
sodium enolate derived from diethyl malonate and the
cyanide anion efficiently opened the azetidinium com-
pound (entries 7 and 8). In the first case, the reaction
smoothly occurred in THF at rt, with a fair regioselec-
tivity in favour of C-4 attack, while the opening with
cyanide anion was run in DMF and gave 7 with total
regioselectivity and almost quantitative yield. In
contrast, the sodium enolate derived from ethyl-
acetoacetate, tert-butyl acetate or acetophenone gave
complex mixtures (entries 1–6) from which epoxide 3
(entries 1 and 2) or azetidine 4 (entry 6) could be iso-
lated. The formation of these products unambiguously
proves that deprotonation of the azetidinium salt by
the reacting enolate occurs with these nucleophiles. As
a matter of fact, epoxide 3 results from a reaction
between azetidinium ylide 8 derived from 2 and aceto-
phenone, as previously described,12 and azetidine 4
results from a Sommelet–Hauser rearrangement of the
intermediate ylide 8,13 as depicted in Scheme 2.
Another parameter governing the efficiency of this reac-
tion is the degree of substitution of the azetidine ring.
This parameter can influence the regioselectivity of the
reaction (compare the exclusive C-4 attack by the
cyanide anion in substrates 2 and 13 and the slight drop
of regioselectivity with substrate 20), or even the reactiv-
ity (substrate 22 did not react with malonate anion, lead-
ing to decomposition products after protracted reaction
time). These hardly predictable results may reflect subtle
steric interactions generated during the SN2 process.
In conclusion, we have shown that azetidinium ions can
be opened in a highly regioselective way by malonate
and cyanide anions, and we have delineated the crucial
parameters for the success of this reaction. Synthetic
applications of this methodology are in progress in our
group.
Having established that sodium diethylmalonate and
potassium cyanide are suitable reagents to achieve our
goal, we next examined the scope of this reaction with
a range of different azetidinium ions. These results are
gathered in Table 2.
Acknowledgement
CNRS is acknowledged for generous support.
Except for azetidinium ion 11 reacting with cyanide
anion (entry 5), all the substrates studied here were
opened with a total to fair regioselectivity. This regiose-
lectivity is in accordance with our previous observations
involving heteronucleophiles,7 that is, regioselective
opening at C-4 with substrates free of substituent at this
position (entries 2–4, 6–7 and 9) and opening at C-2 with
substrate 22, bearing a methyl group at C-4 (entry 8).
The low regioselectivity observed with 11 reacting with
cyanide ion (entry 5) was previously observed with
acetate anion as nucleophile.7 This substrate reacted
however with sodiomalonate in a highly regioselective
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures and char-
acterization of compounds resulting from the nucleo-
philic opening of azetidinium ions by cyanide and
malonate anions) associated with this article can be
References and notes
1
manner (entry 2), as proven by examination of the H
1. Hu, E. X. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 2701.
2. Nenajdenko, V. G.; Karpov, A. S.; Balenkova, E. S.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 2517.
3. Vicario, J. L.; Badia, D.; Carrillo, L. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 5801.
4. Nishikawa, T.; Ishikawa, M.; Wade, K.; Isobe, M. Synlett
2001, 945.
5. Lapinsky, D. J.; Bergmeier, S. C. Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
7109.
NMR of the crude reaction mixture, thus highlighting
the crucial importance of the nucleophile involved in
the reaction. Importantly, in both experiments involving
cyanide or malonate anion, no epimerization at the
stereocentre of the azetidinium bearing the ester or the
cyano moiety could be observed. This demonstrates
that, under such conditions, these nucleophiles are either
unable to deprotonate the azetidinium salts or that the
rate of nucleophilic opening is much higher than depro-
6. For a review, see: Couty, F.; Evano, G.; Prim, D. Mini
Rev. Org. Chem. 2004, 1, 133.
7. Couty, F.; David, O.; Durrat, F.; Evano, G.; Lakhdar, S.;
Marrot, J.; Vargas-Sanchez, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
3479.
8. Couty, F.; David, O.; Durrat, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 1027.
ONa
OBn
Ot-Bu
Me
Ph
OBn
N
N
-
TfO
Me
15
THF, rt
43%
´
´
9. (a) Helinski, J.; Skrzypczynski, Z.; Michalski, J. Tetra-
Ph
hedron Lett. 1995, 36, 9201; (b) Bakalarz-Jeziorna, A.;
25
´
Helinski, J.; Krawiecka, B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
Scheme 3. Hofmann elimination competes with nucleophilic opening.
2001, 1086.