The synthesis of 1 and 2 was designed according to our
previous proposed biogenetic hypothesis based on the new
oxidative transformation of the pyrrole-proline pseudopeptide
5 and guanidine into hydroxyimidazolidinone 9 presenting
the pyrrole-2-aminoimidazole skeleton (Scheme 1).6
Scheme 1. Debromodispacamide B Synthesis
Figure 1. Debromodispacamides and dispacamides B and D.
for the known compound dispacamide B (3) isolated from
an Agelas sp.3 The only differences between 1 and 3 were
the presence of the pyrrolic H-3 at 6.17 ppm besides H-2
and H-4 appearing as doublets of doublets at 6.86 and 6.72
ppm, respectively, indicating the presence of a nonsubstituted
pyrrole unit. The HMBC correlation of the olefinic proton
H-10 at 5.71 ppm with C-12 at 168.4 ppm and the coupling
constant (3JC-H ) 4.3 Hz) confirmed the cis relationship
between the olefinic proton and the carbonyle function,
meaning a (Z) configuration of the double bond. The
configuration of the exocyclic double bound was correlated
with the 3JC-H coupling constants by Branko Stanovnik and
co-workers.4 The systematically measured coupling constants
of various imidazolones were between 2 and 6 Hz for nuclei
with cis-configuration ((Z)-isomers), instead between 8 and
12 Hz for nuclei with trans-configuration ((E)-isomers)
(Figure 2).
The mechanistic studies regarding the general oxidative
transformations of pseudopeptide derivatives such as 5 will
be published elsewhere.
During our survey, we found that the one-pot reaction of
the pseudopeptide pyrrole-proline methyl ester 5 with air
oxygen in the presence of guanidine carbonate and 4 Å
molecular sieves, in DMF at 90 °C for 45 min, afforded
stereoselectively the desired debromodispacamide B (1) in
56% yield, together with the spiropyrrolidine aminoimida-
zolone7 10 in 12% yield (Scheme 1). The mechanism of
the reaction could be explained through the formation of
the intermediates 11 or 12 followed by the nucleophilic
attack of the guanidinic or amidic nitrogens, respectively
(Scheme 1).
Following the same strategy, the stereospecific synthesis
of the (+)-debromodispacamide D (2) started with the
pseudodipeptide pyrrole-hydroxyproline methyl ester 13.
Reaction of the commercially available trans-L-4-hydroxy-
proline methyl ester with the 2-pyrrolecarboxylic acid in the
presence of a coupling reagent (EDCI) gave the pseudo-
dipeptide 13 together with the O-acylated product 14, in 71%
and 9% yields, respectively. The reaction of the guanidine
carbonate with 13 in DMF in the presence of 4 Å molecular
sieves at 90 °C for 30 min led to the formation of
Figure 2. Comparison of 3JC-H coupling constants of (E) and (Z)-
isomers and the (Z) configuration of 1 and 2.
The molecular formula of debromodispacamide D (2) was
confirmed as C11H12N5O3 by HRMS. The comparison of
NMR spectral data with the data of the known brominated
dispacamide D (4)5 and its two-dimensional (2D) NMR
analysis gave the non-brominated and hydroxylated molecule
2. The configuration of the double bond was similarly
assigned to be (Z) (3JC-H ) 4.2 Hz). The only uncertainty
remaining to be solved was the configuration of C-9 of the
side chain. The specific rotation [R]25D 0° (c ) 0.28, MeOH)
indicated that 2 was a racemate that was confirmed by the
stereoselective synthesis described in the following section
of this letter.
(6) (a) Travert, N.; Al-Mourabit, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
10252-10253. (b) Vergne, C.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Perez, T.; Martin, M.-
T.; Adeline, M.-T.; Tran Huu Dau, E.; Al-Mourabit, A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
2421-2424.
(7) For the synthesis of spiropyrrolidine imidazolones see : Fresneda,
P. M.; Castaneda, M.; Sanz, M. A.; Bautista, D.; Molina, P. Tetrahedron
2007, 63, 1849-1856.
(3) Cafieri, F.; Fattorusso, E.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 3587-3590.
(4) Jakse, R.; Recnik, S.; Svete, J.; Golobic, A.; Golic, L.; Stanovnik,
B. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8395-8403.
(5) Cafieri, F.; Carnussio, R.; Fattorusso, E.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.;
Vallefuoco, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 2283-2288.
494
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008