2839, 1494, 1452, 1064, 1027, 733, 697 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 7.35-7.23 (15H), 4.62 (d, J ) 5.6 Hz, 1H), 3.82-3.75
(2H), 3.61 (d, J ) 13.2 Hz, 2H), 3.56 (d, J ) 13.2 Hz, 2H), 2.73
(dd, J ) 12.8, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (dd, J ) 12.9, 5.8 Hz, 1H); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.1 (s), 137.9 (s), 129.3 (d), 128.6
(d), 128.4 (d), 127.7 (d), 127.5 (d), 126.4 (d), 76.3 (d), 70.1 (d),
58.9 (t), 53.7 (t); 99% ee (SFC, Daicel chiralcel OD-H, 100 bar of
CO2, 20% MeOH, 5 mL/min, λ ) 220 nm, tR (major) ) 2.7 min,
tR (minor) ) 3.4 min); HRMS (CI+, CH4) calcd for C23H26NO2
(M + H+) 348.1964, found 348.1966.
conditions. We have to point out that, when the rearrangement
was performed with 1.1 equiv of (CF3CO)2O in the presence
of Et3N (2.0 equiv) in THF at 120 °C during 27 h under
microwave irradiation,1a the rearranged amino alcohol 11 could
not be separated from byproducts. In order to obtain the
morpholine ring, a solution of amino alcohol 11, Et3N (2.0
equiv), and DMAP (2.3 equiv) in CH2Cl2 was treated with TsCl
(3.0 equiv) which was added in small portions until complete
disappearance of aminodiol 11. The reaction mixture was then
treated under basic conditions (NaOH) to produce (S,S)-N-
benzylreboxetine 10 in 57% yield (Scheme 5). As this product
was previously transformed to (S,S)-reboxetine in 88% yield,9a
we have achieved a formal synthesis of (S,S)-reboxetine in eight
steps from 4 with an overall yield of 8.5%. Even though the
rearrangement of 12 to 11 proceeded with a modest yield, this
strategy is better than the previous one considering the overall
yield.
We have shown that the stereospecific rearrangement of N,N-
dialkyl-â-amino alcohols in the presence of a catalytic amount
of (CF3CO)2O could be successfully applied in total synthesis
as we performed two different syntheses of the (S,S)-reboxetine
using the rearrangement as a key step. The first approach
allowed us to complete a total synthesis of (S,S)-reboxetine in
nine steps with an overall yield of 6.2%, and in the second
approach, a formal synthesis of (S,S)-reboxetine was achieved
in eight steps with an improved overall yield of 8.5%.
(+)-(2S,3S)-1-[Benzyl-(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-3-(2-ethoxyphe-
noxy)-3-phenylpropan-2-ol (11). To a solution of 12 (141 mg,
0.33 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in THF (2 mL) was added (CF3CO)2O (19
µL, 0.13 mmol, 0.4 equiv). After being stirred for 18 h at 120 °C
under microwave irradiation, the reaction was quenched with a 3.75
M NaOH solution (2 mL) at room temperature and stirred for 2 h.
The aqueous phase was extracted with AcOEt (2 × 25 mL), and
the combined organic extract was dried over MgSO4 and concen-
trated in vacuo. Purification of the residue by flash chromatography
(silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH 90/10) afforded 51 mg (0.12 mmol, 36%)
of 11 as a colorless oil: C26H31NO4; MW ) 421.53 g‚mol-1; [R]20
D
) +38.0 (c 0.55, CHCl3); IR (neat) 3600-3100, 3050-2700, 1735,
1594, 1499, 1453, 1252, 1213, 1123, 1042, 742, 701 cm-1; 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.35-7.28 (5H), 7.24-7.18 (3H), 7.17-7.14
(2H), 6.90 (m, 1H), 6.85 (ddd, J ) 8.1, 8.1, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.66
(ddd, J ) 8.0, 8.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (dd, J ) 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H),
4.65 (d, J ) 7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.13-4.04 (3H), 3.66 (d, J ) 13.7 Hz,
1H), 3.59 (d, J ) 13.7 Hz, 1H), 3.56-3.44 (4H), 2.74 (m, 1H),
2.61-2.54 (2H), 2.45 (dd, J ) 13.8, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 1.46 (t, J ) 7.0
Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 150.0 (s), 148.0 (s), 138.6
(s), 129.0 (d), 128.6 (d), 128.4 (d), 128.3 (d), 127.4 (d), 127.0 (d),
123.2 (d), 120.9 (d), 119.2 (d), 113.2 (d), 87.1 (d), 73.8 (d), 64.4
(t), 59.7 (t), 59.5 (t), 56.4 (t), 55.3 (t), 14.9 (q); HRMS (ESI) calcd
for C26H32NO4 (M + H+) 422.2326, found 422.2317.
Experimental Section
(-)-(1R,2S)-3-N,N-Dibenzylamino-1-phenylpropan-1,2-diol (3).1
To a solution of the N,N-dibenzylamino alcohol 5 (4.23 g, 12.2
mmol, 1.0 equiv) in freshly distilled toluene (50 mL) at room
temperature was added (CF3CO)2O (689 µL, 4.9 mmol, 0.4 equiv),
and the solution was heated at reflux for 5 h. After addition at
room temperature of an aqueous 3.75 M NaOH solution (15 mL),
the mixture was stirred for 2 h, extracted with EtOAc (2 × 50
mL), and the combined organic extract was dried over MgSO4,
filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the residue by
flash chromatography (silica gel, CH2Cl2/MeOH 99/1) afforded 3.3
g (9.5 mmol, 78%) of 3 as a yellow oil: C23H25NO2; MW ) 347.45
Acknowledgment. Sanofi-Aventis is greatly acknowledged
for financial support (grant to T.-X.M.).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures
and characterization data of compounds 1-3 and 5-16. This
g‚mol-1; [R]20 ) -84.0 (c 0.3, CHCl3); IR (neat) 3387, 3028,
JO701554H
D
710 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 73, No. 2, 2008