and PONV. As a result, there is ongoing pharmaceutical
research to identify potent, selective, and orally bioavail-
able hNK-1 receptor antagonists as potential therapeutic
agents.5 Recently, structure 1 was identified as a potent,
selective hNK-1 receptor antagonist, which warranted fur-
ther development;6 however, the reported synthesis was
unsuitable to the large scale preparation of 1, which was
required to support the program. The development of a
concise, stereoselective, and scalable synthesis of this struc-
turally complex target constituted a considerable synthetic
challenge. Herein we wish to report a convergent, stereo-
controlled asymmetric synthesis of 1.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Allylic Ether 10a
reduction of 3-cyanocyclopentenone (8)8 afforded 6 in
variable yields and moderate enantioselectivities.9 This is a
historic problem with the enantioselective reduction of
2-unsubstituted cyclopentenones, presumably due to the
lack of any functionality in these substrates that would
interact with a chiral reagent or catalyst to offer significant
enantiofacial discrimination. Although there was no pre-
cedent forthe asymmetric, biocatalyticreduction ofenones
similar to 8,10 a ketoreductase library was screened. We
discovered that alcohol dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus
erythropolis (ADH RE) efficiently reduced enone 8 to (S)-
allylic alcohol 6 in high yield (93%) and excellent enantios-
electivity (>99% ee) (Scheme 2). In order to probe the
scope of this novel biocatalytic transformation, two other
3-substituted cyclopentenones were also subjected to the
same reaction conditions and afforded the (S)-allylic alco-
hol in good yield and >99% ee (Table 1). The extension of
this method to other substrates suggests that broader
application may be possible.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
The structural complexity of 1 could be divided into
three distinct synthetic challenges: (1) the sterically con-
gested ether which contained stereochemistry at both
secondary stereogenic termini, (2) the trans,trans-1,2,
3-trisubstituted cyclopentane core, and (3) the pyrrolidinone
ring containing two stereogenic centers, one of which was
a tertiary branched alkyl amine (Scheme 1). In order to
address the stereochemistry of the remote, quaternary ste-
reogenic center, we devised a strategy to produce 1 from
ketone 2, which would be acquired through diastereose-
lective alkylation of oxazolidinone 3 with iodoketone 4.
The most effective method to control the relative stereo-
chemistry of the cyclopentane core in 4 would be via
substrate-controlled conjugate addition of an aryl-metal
species on allylic ether 5, followed by isomerization of the
ketone to the thermodynamically favored diastereomer.
We envisioned that the most elegant approach to construct
both secondary stereogenic centers in allylic ether 5 would
be via convergent, stereospecific coupling of allylic alcohol
6 and alcohol 7, both of which would need to be prepared
in enantiomerically pure form.
Table 1. Enantioselective, Biocatalytic Reduction of 3-Substi-
tuted Cyclopentenones
entry
EWG
conditions
% yield
% ee
1
2
3
CO2Me
CN
ADH RE, NADH, FDH
ADH RE, NADH, FDH
ADH RE, NADH, FDH
83
92
87
>99
>99
>99
SO2Ph
Alcohol 7 is a common structural motif that exists in
several hNK-1 antagonists reported by Merck4,5 and is
readily available via asymmetric reduction of the corre-
sponding aryl methyl ketone.7 In contrast, the enantiose-
lective synthesis of allylic alcohol 6 has not been reported.
Application of existing methodologies to the asymmetric
(8) Zimmerman, H. E.; Pasteris, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 4864–4876.
For an improved synthesis of 8, please refer to the Supporting Informa-
tion.
(9) (a) Ohkuma, T.; Koizumi, M.; Doucet, H.; Pham, T.; Kozawa,
M.; Murata, K.; Katayama, E.; Yokozawa, T.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 13529. (b) Corey, E. J.; Guzman-Perez, A.;
Lazerwith, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11769. (c) Yun, J.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5640. (d) Brown, H. C.;
Ramachandran, P. V. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 16–24. (e) Midland,
M. M.; Tramontano, A.; Kazbubski, A.; Graham, R. S.; Tsai, D. J. S.;
Cardin, D. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1371. (f) Noyori, R.; Suzuki, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 847.
(6) Campos, K. R.; Chen, C-y; Ishibashi, H.; Kato, S.; Klapars, A.;
Kohmura, Y.; Pollard, D. J.; Takezawa, A.; Waldman, J. H.; Wallace,
D. J.; Yasuda, N. PCT Int. Appl. 2008021029, 2008.
(7) Hansen, K. B.; Chilenski, J. R.; Desmond, R.; Devine, P. N.;
Grabowski, E. J. J.; Heid, R.; Kubryk, M.; Mathre, D. J.; Varsolona, R.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 3581.
(10) (a) For an excellent review of enzymatic reduction of ketones,
see: Moore, J. C.; Pollard, D. J.; Kosjek, B.; Devine, P. N. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2007, 1412–1419. (b) Fonteneau, L.; Rosa, S.; Buisson, D. Tetra-
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 5, 2011
1005