becomes particularly challenging to develop electron-
transport materials (ETMs) that can also act as an exciton-
and hole-block layer. The object ETM should possess an
appropriate lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO)
level to give a low electron injection barrier, a low-lying
highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level to block
holes from EML, and a high triplet energy level to block
triplet excitons formed in the EML. To match these require-
ments, the conjugation length of the ETM must be extremely
confined to achieve a wide energy gap and a high triplet
energy (ET) level. It is well-known that the π-electron
delocalizations are extended along the elongated molecular
axis for para linkage with ET decreasing with the number of
phenyl and interrupted at the meta linkage.7 As an example,
the ET of m-terphenyl (2.81 eV) is close to that of biphenyl
(2.84 eV) and much higher than that of p-terphenyl (2.55
eV).8 ET of a typical phosphorescent emitter of fac-tris(2-
phenylpyridine) iridium (Ir(PPy)3) is 2.55 eV. It seems that
a molecule with a π-electron delocalization longer than
p-terphenyl might not be appropriate to block its triplet
excitons formed in the EML for the Ir(PPy)3-based phos-
phorescent OLEDs. To give an ETM with improved electron
mobility, heteroaromatics like phenanthroline,9 pyridine,10
pyrimidine,11 quinoline,12 triazole,13 etc. were incorporated
into the π-conjugated systems. However, more delocalized
π-conjugation may induce a narrower energy gap and a lower
triplet energy level.
We report in this letter syntheses of a series of four-
pyridylbenzene-armed biphenyls with controlled π-conjuga-
tion and application for the Ir(PPy)3-based green phospho-
rescent OLEDs as an electron-transport and exciton- and
hole-block layer. Device efficiency was improved signifi-
cantly in comparison to the devices with both electron-
transport and exciton- and hole-block layers. They were
designed and synthesized by introducing pyridyls on the
periphery of the molecules started from bromopyridine or
pyridylboronate. All the pyridyls and phenyls were combined
with each other at the meta position for 10a and 10b in
comparison to 11a and 11b which contain a more elongated
π-conjugation of 4-pyridyl-1,1′-biphenyl. Scheme 1 shows
synthetic routes of pinacol boronates of pyridylbenzene.
Pyrid-3-yl-containing 1 and 2 were synthesized by Suzuki-
Miyaura coupling reaction between chlorophenylboronic acid
and 3-bromopyridine in high yields. In comparison, pyrid-
4-yl-containing 5 and 6 were synthesized from bromoiodo-
Scheme 1
benzene and pinacol pyrid-4-ylboronate in a moderate yield.
Cross-coupling reaction of bis(pinacolato)diboron with 1 and
2 catalyzed by bis(dibenzylideneacetone) palladium(0) (Pd-
(dba)2) with the ligand of tricyclohexylphosphine (PCy3)
gives the corresponding arylboronates of 3 and 4 in the
presence of potassium acetate, respectively.14 Pyrid-4-yl-
containing arylboronates of 7 and 8 were synthesized by a
modified cross-coupling reaction of bis(pinacolato)diboron
with 5 and 6 catalyzed by 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)-
ferrocene dichloropalladium(II) (PdCl2(dppf)).15
3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromobiphenyl (9) was synthesized by the
lithiation of 1,3,5-tribromobenzene followed by oxidative
coupling with CuCl2.16 Following Suzuki-Miyaura coupling
reaction of 9 with arylboronates of 3, 4, 7, and 8 gives
3,5,3′,5′-tetra(m-pyrid-3-yl)phenyl[1,1′]biphenyl (10a), 3,5,3′,5′-
tetra(p-pyrid-3-yl)phenyl[1,1′]biphenyl (11a), 3,5,3′,5′-tetra-
(m-pyrid-4-yl)phenyl[1,1′]biphenyl (10b), and 3,5,3′,5′-tetra-
(p-pyrid-4-yl)phenyl[1,1′]biphenyl (11b), respectively (Scheme
2).
As shown in Table 1, HOMO levels of both the pyrid-3-
yl- and pyrid-4-yl-containing biphenyl derivatives determined
by atmospheric ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy are
around 6.60 eV. They are much lower than that of well-
known ETM of tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum (Alq3)5a
and equal to that of well-known hole-block material of 2,9-
dimethyl-4,7-diphenylphenathroline (BCP),6 indicating their
improved hole-block property. LUMO levels of 10a and 10b
calculated from their HOMO levels and the lowest energy
absorption edges of the UV-vis absorption spectra are 2.57
and 2.53 eV, respectively, in contrast to 2.94 and 3.04 eV
for 11a and 11b. Much lower lying LUMO levels for 11a
(7) Brike, J. B. Photophysics of Aromatic Compounds; John Wiley &
Sons: New York, 1970.
(8) (a) Higuchi, J.; Hayashi, K.; Yagi, M.; Kondo, H. J. Phys. Chem. A
2002, 106, 8609. (b) Higuchi, J.; Hayashi, K.; Seki, K.; Yagi, M.; Ishizu,
K.; Kohno, M.; Ibuki, E.; Tajima, K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 6084.
(9) Naka, S.; Okada, H.; Onnagawa, H.; Tsutsui, T. Appl. Phys. Lett.
2000, 76, 197.
(10) (a) Yamamoto, T.; Maruyama, T.; Zhou, Z.-H.; Ito, T.; Fukuda,
A.; Kubota, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4832. (b) Tamao, K.; Uchida,
M.; Izumizawa, T.; Furukawa, K.; Yamaguchi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 11974.
(11) Wong, K.-T.; Hung, T. S.; Lin, Y. T.; Wu, C.-C.; Lee, G.-H.; Peng,
S.-M.; Chou, C. H.; Su, Y. O. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 513.
(12) Saito, N.; Kanbara, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Kubota, K.
Macromolecules 1997, 27, 657.
(13) (a) Kido, J.; Hongawa, K.; Okuyama, K.; Nagai, K. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 1994, 64, 815. (b) Kido, J.; Kimura, M.; Nagai, K. Chem. Lett. 1996,
47.
(14) Ishiyama, T.; Ishida, K.; Miyaura, N. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9813.
(15) (a) Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 611, 392.
(b) Ishiyama, T.; Itoh, Y.; Kitano, T.; Miyaura, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
38, 3447. (c) Ishiyama, T.; Murata, M.; Miyaura, N. J. Org. Chem. 1995,
60, 7508.
(16) Yamanoi, Y.; Sakamoto, Y.; Kusukawa, T.; Fujita, M.; Sakamoto,
S.; Yamaguchi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 980.
942
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 5, 2008