hydrochloride cations whose irradiation leads to stereo-
selective [4 + 4] photodimerization.7 Modulation of thermal
equilibria of the quests are also known, e.g., shifting the 4,4′-
bis(dimethylamino)diphenylcarbinol/carbocation equilibrium
toward the carbocation with CB[7].8 Here, we demonstrate
host-guest interactions between CB[7] and a family of
guests based on the N-methyl-4-(p-substituted benzoyl)-
pyridinium cation (BP-X, where X ) -OCH3, -CH3, -H, -Br,
-CHO, -NO2, and -S+(CH3)2), and we report that the ketone
to gem-diol equilibrium in water (eq 1) is controlled by the
preference of the keto form for the CB[7] cavity.
1
Figure 1. Room temperature (23 °C) H NMR of the aromatic
region of BP-H (X ) H; 16.1 mM) in D2O/0.1 M KCl before (A)
and after (B) addition of 1.25 mol equivalents of CB[7]. The upfield
shift of all protons supports the endo-orientation. The small
“impurities” in the baseline is the gem-diol form of BP-H in
equilibrium with the dominant keto form.
In aqueous solution, carbonyl compounds exist in equi-
librium with their hydrated forms (gem-diols). The concen-
tration of the latter is usually very low, but it can increase if
substitution renders the carbonyl group more susceptible to
nucleophilic addition.9 The position of this equilibrium can
be of vital importance in biological systems where reactivity
may be either associated with or stereoelectronically con-
trolled by only one of the two forms.10-13 Ideally, the
carbonyl/gem-diol equilibrium would be controlled with
supramolecular additives rather than by modifying the
substrate or the environment (e.g., by changing the pH).
All BP-Xs of this study were available from previous
work14 and were chosen as model ketones because of their
water solubility, their relation to the NAD+/NADH coenzyme
of dehydrogenases, their expected adjustable aptitude for
hydration by para substitution, and their structural similarity
to methyl viologen (N,N′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium di-
cation, MV2+),15,16 which warrants interaction with CB[7].
In this regard, it is noted that MV2+ fits well in CB[7], and
the two positive charges are stabilized by ion-dipole
interactions with the carbonyl groups of the rims.2,15,16 By
the same token, however, since BP-Xs have only one
pyridinium ring, their orientation relative to the cavity of
CB[7] was not obvious a priori: they could assume either
an exo or an endo stereochemistry as illustrated below:
1
presence of CB[7] (purchased from Aldrich), the H NMR
of BP-H (X ) H) in D2O shows an upfield shift for all
protons, consistent with the endo-BP-H@CB[7]. Identical
results were observed for all BP-X of this study. The exo
orientation is in fact observed with the corresponding
N-hexyl-4-(p-substituted benzoyl)pyridinium cations, by
analogy to that reported for hexylviologen (N,N′-dihexyl-
4,4′-bipyridinium dication; refer to the Supporting Informa-
tion).16 Clearly, the benzoyl group, despite possible H-bond-
ing interactions with the solvent through the carbonyl oxygen,
prefers to retreat into the hydrophobic cavity where it must
enjoy greater stabilization through hydrophobic interactions.
As shown in Figure 2, upon intercalation in CB[7] the longest
wavelength electronic absorption of BP-X decreases in
analogy to what has been reported for MV2+.17 The 1:1
stoichiometry of the resulting BP-X@CB[7] complexes is
supported by the presence of stable isosbestic points in the
UV-titration of BP-X with CB[7], and in the case of BP-H,
it was confirmed by a peak at m/z ) 1361.58 (expected at
m/z ) 1361.20) in the ESI mass spectrum of the BP-H/CB[7]
aqueous solution (see the Supporting Information). The
strong binding aptitude of BP-H with CB[7] is reflected in
the equilibrium constant for complex formation (Keq ) (6.2
( 2.1) × 103 M-1 by analysis of the UV titration data of
Figure 2; see the Supporting Information).18
(10) Silva, A. M.; Cachau, R. E.; Sham, H. L.; Erickson, J. W. J. Mol.
Biol. 1996, 255, 321-346.
(11) Eisses, K. Th. Bioorg. Chem. 1989, 17, 268-274.
(12) Likar, M. D.; Taylor, R. J.; Fagerness, P. E.; Hiyama, Y.; Robins,
R. H. Pharm. Res. 1993, 10, 75-79.
1
(13) Hanessian, S.; Roy, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1005-1008.
(14) Leventis, N.; Rawashdeh, A.-M. M.; Zhang, G.; Elder, I. A.;
Sotiriou-Leventis, C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7501-7510.
(15) Kim, H.-J.; Jeon, W. S.; Ko, Y. H.; Kim, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5007-5011.
The exo versus endo orientation was elucidated by H
NMR. As shown in Figure 1 for the aromatic region, in the
(6) Maddipatla, M. V. S. N.; Kaanumalle, L. S.; Natarajan, A.; Patta-
biraman, M.; Ramamurthy, V. Langmuir 2007, 23, 7545-7554.
(7) Wang, R.; Yuan, L.; Macartney, D. H. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1237-
1239.
(16) Moon, K.; Kaifer, A. E. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 185-188.
(17) Ong, W.; Go´mez-Kaifer, M.; Kaifer, A. E. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1791-
1794.
(8) Wang, R.; Macartney, D. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 311-314.
(9) See for example: Greenzaid, P.; Luz, Z.; Samuel, D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1967, 89, 749-756.
(18) Connors, K. A. Binding Constants, The Measurement of Molecular
Complex Stability; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, 1987; Chapter
4, p 141.
1132
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008