significant reason appears to be the lack of attractive
strategies for the preparation of functionalized structures,
associated also to a limited number of commercially available
starting materials.
As sulfenates are normally converted into sulfoxides upon
quenching with soft electrophiles13 (S-alkylation), the inves-
tigation we suggest using paracyclophane-based species could
provide a diastereoselective version of this reaction. Com-
pared to the successful but scarce precedents, an obvious
originality concerns the unprecedented use of planar chirality
as element of stereocontrol.14 Full accounts on this work are
provided in this manuscript.
Symmetrical sulfoxide 715 was activated by triflic anhy-
dride to give a highly electrophilic intermediate, which was
further reacted with unsubstituted [2.2]paracyclophane 1 to
produce the corresponding sulfonium trifluoromethane-
sulfonate 8 (Figure 2). Subsequent treatment with Et3N
In this regard, very few derivatives incorporating a sulfur
function, even in racemic form, have been described so far.2-6
As a prominent example, (()-[2.2]paracyclophane-4-thiol 2
was mentioned2 for the first time in 2001, the few syntheses
of which still suffering from multistep derivatization reactions
and low overall yields.7 To overcome these severe shortcom-
ings, we were interested in developing a precursor that could
facilitate the synthesis of a variety of sulfur-containing [2.2]-
paracyclophanes, including previously cited thiol 2 but also
related sulfides8 3. â-Sulfanyl ester 4 was postulated as a
suitable candidate for the following criteria. In principle, it
should be prepared from simple paracyclophane 1 using an
elegant but surprisingly overlooked SEAr reaction mediated
by a sulfonium salt.9,10 Conversion into 2 and 3 should then
be directly secured according to a retro-Michael pathway.9
Having a current interest into sulfenate salts11 (sulfur
nucleophiles with general structure R1SO-), oxidation of 4
into the analogous sulfinyl compound 5 could also permit a
straightforward extension toward this unusual chemistry.12
Figure 2. Intermediates in the synthesis of 4.
(1) (a) Modern Cyclophane Chemistry; Gleiter, R., Hopf, H., Eds; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, 2004. (b) Gibson, S. E.; Knight, J. D. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2003, 1, 1256-1269. (c) Bra¨se, S.; Dahmen, S.; Ho¨fener, S.; Lauterwasser,
F.; Kreis, M.; Ziegert, R. E. Synlett 2004, 2647-2669.
induced a single â-elimination-based dealkylation and de-
livered the pivotal intermediate 4 in 75% yield. Conversion
of 4 into the targeted compounds 2-5 was then cleanly
achieved as detailed below. Reaction with t-BuOK with
subsequent acidification afforded thiol 2 in 89% yield,
thereby providing by far the most elegant access2 to this
compound. Use of alkyl halides as alternative electrophilic
partners furnished also, in a single procedural step, the
analogous sulfides 3 (85-93% yield). Finally, oxidation of
(2) Thiol: (a) Kane, V. V.; Gerdes, A.; Grahn, W.; Ernst, L.; Dix, I.;
Jones, P. G.; Hopf, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 373-376. (b) Kreis,
M.; Bra¨se, S. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 47, 313-319.
(3) Sulfides: (a) Menichetti, S.; Faggi, C.; Lamanna, G.; Marrocchi, A.;
Minuti, L.; Taticchi, A. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 5626-5631. (b) Pelter, A.;
Mootoo, B.; Maxwell, A.; Reid, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8391-
8394. (c) Marchand, A.; Maxwell, A.; Mootoo, B.; Pelter, A.; Reid, A.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7331-7338. (d) Hou, X.-L.; Wu, X.-W.; Dai, L.-
X.; Cao, B.-X.; Sun, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2000, 1195-1196.
(4) Sulfoxides: (a) Hitchcock, P. B.; Rowlands, G. J.; Seacome, R. J.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3873-3876. (b) Hitchcock, P. B.; Rowlands,
G. J.; Parmar, R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2005, 4219-4221. (c)
Reich, H. J.; Yelm, K. E. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5672-5679.
(5) Sulfonamides: Braddock, D., C.; MacGilp, I. D.; Perry, B. G. AdV.
Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1117-1130.
(6) Sulfonic acid: (a) van Lindert, H. C. A.; Koeberg-Telder, A.;
Cerfontain, H. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1992, 111, 379-388. (b) van
Lindert, H. C. A.; van Doorn, J. A.; Bakker, B. H.; Cerfontain, H. Recl.
TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1996, 115, 167-178.
(7) The sulfur atom was introduced via a Newman-Kwart reaction,
treatment of lithiated species with elemental sulfur or a Pd-catalysis with
triisopropylsilanethiol. See ref 2.
16
4 with H2O2 gave the sulfenate precursor 5 in 96% yield
as an inseparable 3:2 diastereoisomeric mixture. Attractive
features of the syntheses include introduction of the sulfur
moiety on the paracyclophane core in an extremely simple
way with stable and readily available reagents, convenient
protocols appropriate for scalability, and straightforward
purifications.
(()-[2.2]Paracyclophane-4-sulfenic acid salt was generated
in THF by deprotonation of 5 with t-BuOK at low temper-
ature (-78 °C), followed by a spontaneous retro-Michael
reaction. After in situ quenching with alkyl halides, we were
delighted to uniformly isolate in excellent yields the antici-
pated sulfoxides as single diastereoisomers 9a-c (Table 1,
entries 1-3).17 The (SP,SS)* configuration was unambigu-
(8) To the best of our knowledge, only the t-butylsulfanyl derivative of
3 (alkyl ) t-Bu) has been described so far. See ref 4a.
(9) (a) Becht, J.-M.; Wagner, A.; Mioskowski, C. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 5758-5761. (b) Becht, J.-M.; Wagner, A.; Mioskowski, C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 7031-7033.
(10) It was previously shown that the aromatic sulfonation of 1 with
sulfur trioxide, in the presence of 1,4-dioxane, proceeds cleanly to afford
[2.2]paracyclophane-4-sulfonic acid. See ref 6.
(11) (a) Sandrinelli, F.; Perrio, S.; Beslin, P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
8626-8627. (b) Sandrinelli, F.; Perrio, S.; Averbuch-Pouchot, M.-T. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 3619-3622. (c) Sandrinelli, F.; Fontaine, G.; Perrio, S.; Beslin,
P. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6916-6919. (d) Sandrinelli, F.; Boudou, C.;
Caupe`ne, C.; Averbuch-Pouchot, M.-T.; Perrio, S.; Metzner, P. Synlett 2006,
3289-3293. (e) Boudou, C.; Berge`s, M.; Sagnes, C.; Sopkova´-de Oliveira
Santos, J.; Perrio, S.; Metzner, P. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5403-5406.
(12) (a) Caupe`ne, C.; Boudou, C.; Perrio, S.; Metzner, P. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 2812-2815. (b) Maitro, G.; Prestat, G.; Madec, D.; Poli, G. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7449-7454. (c) Maitro, G.; Vogel, S.; Prestat, G.;
Madec, D.; Poli, G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5951-5954. (d) Colobert, F.;
Ballesteros-Garrido, R.; Leroux, F. R.; Ballesteros, R.; Abarca, B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 6896-6899. (e) Maitro, G.; Vogel, S.; Sadaoui,
M.; Prestat, G.; Madec, D.; Poli, G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5493-5496.
(13) For a review: O’Donnell, J. S.; Schwan, A. L. J. Sulfur Chem. 2004,
25, 183-211.
(14) Excellent diastereocontrols were already reported using isoborneol,
cysteine and (R)-phenylethylamine derivatives. See ref 13.
(15) This compound was prepared in a 93% overall yield by Michael
addition of 3-sulfanylpropanoic acid methyl ester on methyl acrylate,
followed by oxidation with NaIO4. See Supporting Information.
(16) An H2O2/2,2,2-trifluoroethanol combination was used: Be´gue´, J.-
P.; Bonnet-Delpon, D.; Crousse, B. Synlett 2004, 18-29.
(17) Previously reported [2.2]paracyclophan-4-yl sulfoxides were syn-
thetized using oxidation or Andersen approaches. See ref 4.
1272
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008