high resolution (HR) EI-MS exhibited an ion peak at m/z
656 [M]+ and 656.3099 (calcd for 656.3098), indicating the
molecular formula was C38H44N2O8. Extensive analyses of
1H and 13C NMR spectra (Table 1) together with the use of
1H-1H COSY and HMQC data of 3 revealed that the signal
patterns of 3 were quite similar to those of 1 except that
only one aromatic proton signal was observed instead of the
characteristic AB pair of 1. However, the even molecular
weight of 656 implied the presence of an even number of
nitrogen atoms. These results suggested 3 might be a sym-
metrical dimer of 1, in which the connection position should
be at the aromatic ring. Further HMBC experiment confirmed
the substitution point was at C-1. Thus, the planar structure
of 3 was deduced; hereto, the stereochemistry of 3 was still
unclear. Unfortunately, the NOESY and CD data could not
provide any available clues. In addition, several papers have
reported the disinomenine, but no reliable information on
its exact structure, especially stereo-structure, was provided.15
Therefore, much effort was made to successfully produce
fine crystals to determine the structure directly by an X-ray
crystallographic analysis. Fortunately, the result clearly
confirmed the structure of 3 including stereo-structure (Figure
1), a dimer of 1 as shown in Scheme 1.
its molecular formula was determined to be C26H29NO6 [(M)+
451.1971, calcd for 451.1995] in HR-ESI-MS, which meant
the existence of an odd number of nitrogen atoms. The H
1
NMR spectrum clearly showed signals including a single
aromatic proton as 3 from sinomenine skeleton (Table 1).
Moreover, a set of 1,3,4-trisubstituted phenyl group and a
methoxyl group assignable to guaiacol were observed.
1
Detailed analyses of H-1H COSY and HMQC spectra
suggested that 4 should be composed of sinomenine and
guaiacol moieties. To determine the connectivity of the two
moieties, HMBC was measured. Clear long-range correlation
between C-4′ and H-2, C-1 and H-5′ proposed that C-4′ of
guaiacol attached to C-1 of sinomenine via a C-C bond.
From forenamed findings, the structure of 4 was deduced as
shown in Scheme 1.
Compound 5 was isolated as a slightly yellow powder
with a molecular ion peak at m/z 451.1962 [M]+ (calcd for
C26H29NO6, 451.1995) in HR-ESI-MS spectrum and [R]25
D
) +1.8° (c ) 0.45, CH3OH). Detailed analysis of 1H NMR
1
spectrum with H-1H COSY and HMQC revealed that 5
possessed the same sinomenine moiety as 4; however,
aromatic protons assignable to guaiacol moiety displayed 1,2-
disubstutited pattern which is the same as those of guaiacol.
Moreover, in 13C NMR spectrum of 5 together with analysis
of HMBC spectrum, C-1 (δ 144.1) displayed a marked
downfield shift compared with that (δ 131.8) of 4. This
evidence led us to suppose that sinomenine and guaiacol
moieties were connected via a ether bond, which was further
supported by the result of acetylation of 5, a monoacetate
of OH at C-4 was obtained. On the basis of these data,
compound 5 was elucidated as shown.
The possible mechanism in the formation of C-C bonds
to give unique structures is of great interest. From the
structures of compounds 3-5, most probably, oxidation of
1 or 2 generated oxygen radicals at OH group, and then the
oxygen radicals were delocalized to form carbon-located
radicals. Subsequent coupling of these radicals produced
C-C or C-O metabolites. It is reasonable that some
enzymes presented in A. semisupina might catalyze this type
of reaction.12 To verify the role of the OH group in the
formation of the metabolites, 4-acetyl sinomenine was
subjected to biotransformation followed the same protocol.
The result showed that no 3, 4, and 5 were detected by high-
performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) analysis.
This experiment strongly suggested that the 4-OH is a crucial
group during the formation the metabolites. However, as
mentioned previously,15 sinomenine could be oxidized by
silver nitrate to form two 1,1′-disinomenines (ratio ) 1:1)
although the structures were not determined. Our experiments
revealed that the MnO2 catalyzed reaction of 1 and 2
Figure 1. X-ray crystal structure of the compound 3 showing the
crystallographic numbering.
Compound 4 was obtained as a white powder, showed
mp. 151-153 °C, [R]25 ) +14.5° (c ) 0.4, CH3OH), and
D
(12) (a) Stabler, P. J.; Bruce, N. C. Appl. EnViron. Microbiol. 1998, 64,
4106-4108. (b) Stabler, P. J.; Holt, P. J.; Bruce, N. C. Appl. EnViron.
Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3716-3719. (c) Pezzella, A.; Lista, L.; Napolitano,
A.; d’Ischia, M. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2005, 18, 1413-1419. (d) Pezzella,
A.; Lista, L.; Napolitano, A.; d’Ischia, M. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5652-
5659. (e) Aoyagi, N.; Ogawa, N.; Izumi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
4797-4801. (f) Nicotra, S.; Intra, A.; Ottolina, G.; Riva, S.; Danieli, B.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2927-2931. (g) Takemoto, M.; Suzuki,
Y.; Tanaka, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8499-8501. (h) Sridhar, M.;
Vadivel, S. K.; Bhalerao, U. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5695-5696.
(i) Tonami, H.; Uyama, H.; Nagahata, R.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Lett. 2004,
33, 796-797. (j) Kobayashi, A.; Koguchi, Y.; Kanzaki, H.; Kajiyama, S.
I.; Kawazu, K. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 1994, 58, 133-134.
(14) He, W. Y.; Yao, X. J.; Liu, P. J. Sci. China, Ser. B: Chem. 2007,
37, 54-63.
(15) (a) Goto, K.; Sudzuki, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1929, 4, 107-111.
(b) Goto, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1929, 4, 129-132. (c) Goto, K.; Mitsui,
S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1931, 6, 33-39. (d) Goto, K.; Shishido, H. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1931, 6, 79-87. (e) Goto, K.; Yamamoto, I.; Matsumoto,
S. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 1954, 30, 883-886. (f) Okamoto, Y.; Yuge, E.; Nagai,
Y.; Katsuta, R.; Kishimoto, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kikuchi, T.; Tomita, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 24, 1933-1935. (g) Minamikawa, J.; Iijima, I.;
Brossi, A. Heterocycles 1978, 10, 79-84.
(13) Ruley, A. T.; Sharma, N. C.; Sahi, S. V. Plant. Physiol. Biochem.
2004, 42, 899-906.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008
1121