992
C. Congiu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 989–993
Among imidazolone derivatives, compound 5 shows
moderate activity against the full NCI 60 cell panel, with
a MG-MID value of 4.43. However, 5 exhibits high
selectivity against the DU145 prostate cancer cell line
(pGI50 = 5.8). The 4-chlorophenyl analogue 7 also re-
tains moderate activity in the full NCI 60 cell panel
(MG-MID = 4.50), but it shows nanomolar selective
inhibitory potency (pGI50 > 8) against the CCRF-
CEM leukemic cell line. Inversion of pendant aryl rings
on the imidazolone core of 7 leads to compound 13
which inhibits in nanomolar concentration the growth
of HL-60 (TB) (pGI50 = 6.4), MOLT-4 (pGI50 = 7.7),
and SR (pGI50 = 7.5) leukemic cell lines. These are very
good results as compared to pGI50 values of reference
compound CA-4 (Table 1). Replacement of 4-chloro-
phenyl of 7 with a 4-methoxyphenyl gives the inactive
compound 8. While, the lack of 5-methoxy group in tri-
methoxyphenyl ring of 8 affords imidazolone 11 that
selectively inhibited in sub-micromolar concentrations
the growth of leukemic SR cell line at GI50
(pGI50 = 7.0) and TGI (pTGI = 6.2) levels. This pTGI
value as well as those of compounds 13 and 22 (4.4
and 4.8, respectively) are better than that of CA-4
(4.1) (Table 1).
tend SAR. Compounds bearing a 3,4,5-trimethoxy-
phenyl ring linked to either N-1 or C-4 position of
imidazole core show the most interesting profile of cyto-
toxicity with preferential activity against cell lines of the
leukemia sub-panel, in some cases with GI50 values in
nanomolar concentrations. In contrast, the imidazole-
2-thione 33, bearing a 3,4-dimethoxyphenyl group at
C-4 position, shows expanded activity spectrum with
GI50 values in micromolar concentrations. Moreover,
several derivatives have been found to be more cytotoxic
than CA-4.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Developmental Therapeutics
Program of the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda,
MD, for providing the in vitro antitumor screening
data.
References and notes
1. Pettit, G. R.; Cragg, G. M.; Singh, S. B. J. Nat. Prod.
1987, 50, 386.
2. McGown, A. T.; Fox, B. W. Cancer Chemother. Pharma-
col. 1990, 26, 79.
In the series of imidazole-2-thione analogues, compound
32, which retains the 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl group at
C-4, shows good potency and selectivity against the
CCRF-CEM cell line (pGI50 = 6.2) of leukemia sub-pa-
nel. Imidazolethione 32 shows a clear improvement of
growth inhibitory activity compared to the imidazolone
analogue 16. Lack of 5-methoxy group in trimethoxy-
phenyl ring of 32 gives compound 35 and results in
diminished inhibitory potency. In contrast, replacement
of 3-chloro-4-methoxyphenyl of 35 with a 4-chloro-
phenyl ring gives the analogue 33 and results in remark-
able enhancement of antiproliferative activity. As a
result, 33 exhibits the best MG_MID value (4.88), with
inhibitory potency in low micromolar values against 27
cell lines, being NSCLC HOP-92 the most sensitive
(pGI50 = 6.5, pTGI = 5.1).
3. Pettit, G. R.; Singh, S. B.; Hamel, E.; Lin, C. M.; Alberts,
D. S.; Garcia-Kendall, D. Experientia 1989, 45, 209.
4. (a) Dorr, R. T.; Dvorakova, K.; Snead, K.; Alberts, D. S.;
Salmon, S. E.; Pettit, G. R. Invest. New Drug 1996, 14,
131; (b) Ohsumi, K.; Nakagawa, R.; Fukuda, Y.; Hata-
naka, T.; Morinaga, Y.; Nihei, Y.; Ohishi, K.; Suga, Y.;
Akiyama, Y.; Tsuji, T. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3022.
5. (a) Pettit, G. R.; Temple, C., Jr.; Narayanan, V. L.;
Varma, R.; Simpson, M. J.; Boyd, M. R.; Rener, G. A.;
Bansal, N. C. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 1995, 10, 299; (b)
Chaplin, D. J.; Pettit, G. R.; Hill, S. A. Anticancer Res.
1999, 19, 189; (c) Nabha, S. M.; Mohammad, R. M.; Wall,
N. R.; Dutcher, J. A.; Salkini, B. M.; Pettit, G. R.; Al
Katib, A. M. Anticancer Drugs 2001, 12, 57; (d) West, C.
M.; Price, P. Anticancer Drugs 2004, 15, 179.
6. (a) Pettit, G. R.; Rhodes, M. R.; Herald, D. L.; Chaplin,
D. J.; Stratford, M. R. L.; Hamel, E.; Pettit, R. K.;
Chapuis, J.-C.; Oliva, D. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 1998, 13,
981; (b) Nam, N. H.; Kim, Y.; You, Y.-J.; Hong, D.-H.;
Ki, H.-M.; Ahn, B.-Z. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11,
3073.
At present, a molecular target responsible for the ob-
served antiproliferative activity of this new series of
compounds has not be identified, and a reasonable
explanation of SAR described above is not yet possible.
Among synthesized compounds, imidazolones 7, 13, and
imidazolethiones 31, 32, bearing a trimethoxyphenyl
group, were the most potent and selective in the
in vitro assay. Because a trimethoxyphenyl group is con-
sidered a structural feature typical for inhibitors of
tubulin polymerization,19 at least for these analogues
an antimitotic mechanism of action could be postulated.
7. Nam, N. H. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 1697, and
references therein.
8. (a) Ohsumi, K.; Hatanaka, T.; Fujita, K.; Nakagawa, R.;
Fukuda, Y.; Nihei, Y.; Suga, Y.; Morinaga, Y.; Akiyama,
Y.; Tsuji, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 3153; (b)
Wang, L.; Woods, K. W.; Li, Q.; Barr, K. J.; McCroskey,
R. W.; Hannick, S. M.; Gherke, L.; Bruce Credo, R.; Hui,
Y.-H.; Marsh, K.; Warner, R.; Lee, J. Y.; Zielinski-
Mozng, N.; Frost, D.; Rosenberg, S. H.; Sham, H. L.
J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1697.
Thus, compounds 7, 13, and 32 are now submitted to
further biological studies, and the relative possible re-
sults will be disclosed in due course.
9. Edwards, M. L.; Stemerick, D. M.; Sunkara, P. S. J. Med.
Chem. 1990, 33, 1948.
10. Wu-Wong, J. R.; Alder, J. D.; Alder, L.; Burns, D. J.;
Han, E. K.; Credo, B.; Tahir, S. K.; Dayton, B. D.; Ewing,
P. J.; Chiou, W. J. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 1486.
11. Fang, L.; He, Q.; Hu, Y.; Yang, B. Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol. 2007, 59, 397.
In summary, herein reported preliminary results confirm
the validity of our approach providing practical access
to imidazolone-based antitumor agents. The reported
methods of synthesis have general applicability, so that
a large series of compounds would be prepared to ex-
12. Hsieh, H. P.; Liou, J. P.; Mahindroo, N. Curr. Pharm.
Des. 2005, 11, 1655.