of a suitable 1,2-migrating group (MG) in ii would provoke
a subsequent 1,2-shift6 into iii, which upon proton loss and
protiodeauration would afford 1,3-diene7 3. It is reasonable
to propose that the latter may undergo 6π-electrocyclization
into naphthalene8,9 2, analogously to the known cyclization
of acyloxy-1,3,5-trienes10 (eq 3).
It deserves mentioning that the isomerization of acetates
1 into 1,3-dienes 5 in the presence of Ag-catalysts was
reported (eq 4).11 However, the nature of the second step
(1,2-H-shift or proton elimination) remained unclear. To
address this issue, we performed mechanistic studies12 for
MG ) H (eq 3) employing Au(I) catalyst. Experiments
revealed that the reaction proceeds exclusively via a 1,3-
shift13-15 -elimination16 sequence.
To this end, a possible isomerization of propargyl phos-
phate 1a (MG ) H) in the presence of different catalysts
has been tested (Table 1). It was found that employment of
Thus, we hypothesized that successful incorporation of a
1,2-migration into this cascade can only be achieved when
a migrating group resides at a “proton-free” quaternary C-4
center. Therefore, isomerization of acetate 1d, possessing a
strained cyclobutane ring, was examined. Indeed, a tandem
1,3-migration and ring expansion via a 1,2-shift occurred
leading to 1,3-diene 3d in a moderate yield (eq 5). Moreover,
isomerization of cyclopentyl homologs 1e and 1f afforded
target naphthalenes 3e and 3f respectively (eq 5), thus pro-
viding a proof of concept for this cascade transformation.17
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
entry
catalyst
10% AgOTf
5% Ph3PAuCl, 5% AgOTf
5% AuCl3
5% AuCl3, 15% AgOTf
5% AuI
5% R3PAuCl (R ) Et, Ph)
yield 4a, %a yield 3a, %a
1
2
3
4
5
6
73
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
86
86
86
a Isolated yield of product for reaction performed on 0.1-0.2 mmol
scale.
Next, cycloisomerization of substrates possessing better
1,2-migrating groups was examined (Table 2). Thus, a
tandem acyloxy- or phosphatyloxy- and Ph-group migration/
benzannulation of propargylic esters 1g-n proceeded smoothly
Ag triflate gave corresponding allene 4a in good yield (entry
1). Remarkably, switching to cationic Au(I) triflate led to
the formation of target 1,3-diene 3a in 86% yield (entry 2).
Monitoring of the reaction course revealed that this trans-
formation proceeded through allenic intermediate 3a.12
Employment of Au(III) complexes (entries 3 and 4), non-
cationic Au(I) halides (entries 5 and 6), Cu(I) and Cu(II)
triflates, as well as Brønsted or Lewis acids, resulted in no
reaction.12
(11) (a) Saucy, G.; Marbet, R.; Lindlar, H.; Isler, O. HelV. Chim. Acta
1959, 42, 1945. (b) Schlossarczyk, H.; Sieber, W.; Hesse, M.; Hansen, H.-
J.; Schmid, H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1973, 56, 875. (c) Cookson, R. C.; Cramp,
M. C.; Parsons, P. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm. 1980, 197.
(12) See Supporting Information for details.
(13) Direct observation of the allenes 4 supported 1,3-migration path.12
(14) For reviews, see: (a) Allin, S. M.; Baird, R. D. Curr. Org. Chem.
2001, 5, 395. (b) Nubbemeyer, U. Synthesis 2003, 7, 961. (c) Fanning, K.
N.; Jamieson, A. G.; Sutherland, A. Curr. Org. Chem. 2006, 10, 1007.
(15) D-Labeling studies on isomerization of 1a-d ruled out possible
involvement of alkyne-vinylidene isomerization path.
(5) (a) Buzas, A.; Istrate, F.; Gagosz, F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1957. (b)
Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16804. (c) Luo, T.; Schreiber, S.
L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8250. (d) Schwier, T.; Sromek, A.
W.; Yap, D. M. L.; Chernyak, D.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 9868.
(6) For general review, see: (a) Ducrot, P. H. In One or More CH and/
or CC Bond(s) Formed by Rearrangement; Katritzky, A. R., Taylor, R. J.
K., Eds.; Comprehensive Organic Functional Group Transformations II;
Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2005; 1, pp 375-426.
(16) Significant loss of D-label, as well as scrambling of the latter
between C-1 and C-2, was observed for labeled phosphates 1b-d and 1c-d.
Reversible protonation at C-1 under the prolonged reaction times is most
likely the reason for the observed notable incorporation of D at C-1.
(7) For syntheses of 1,3-dienes employing Au catalysis, see: (a) Buzas,
A.; Istrate, F.; Gagosz, F. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 985. (b) See also ref 3d.
(8) For a recent review on naphthalene syntheses, see: de Koning, C.
B.; Rousseau, A. L.; van Otterlo, W. A. L. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 7.
(9) For selected examples, see: (a) Dyker, G.; Hilderbrandt, D.; Liu, J.;
Merz, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4399. (b) Zhao, J.; Hughes, C.
O.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7436. (c) Asao, N.; Takahashi,
K.; Lee, S.; Kasahara, T.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
12650. See also: (d) Grise´, C. M.; Barriault, L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5905.
(e) Asao, N.; Sato, K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5361. (f) Wang, S.; Zhang, L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14274.
(10) Hamura, T.; Morita, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Suzuki, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 167 and references therein.
(17) For reasons, which are not clearly understood, 3d did not cyclize
into 2 even under forcing reaction conditions.
1466
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 7, 2008