Figure 2. Synthetic strategy for the core Skeleton of 1 and 3.
Figure 1. Structures of triterpenoids 1-4.
reveal the lancifodilactone skeleton 10. We have explored
the arene-alkene meta-photocycloaddition reaction11,12
for this [5+2] strategy owing to its high functional group
compatibility and the accessibility of synthetic precur-
sors.
The arene-olefin meta-photocycloaddition reaction was
discovered more than four decades ago.11 Its synthetic utility
has been clearly demonstrated by Wender and co-workers.13
Although the 4-atom-tethered intramolecular arene-olefin
meta-photocycloaddition was shown to be problematic,14
Wender and DeLong noted that restriction of the tether
conformations improved the efficiency.15 Recently, Russell
and co-workers also found that a fused cyclohexane ring
helped constrain the 4-carbon tether in favorable conforma-
tions and the photocycloaddition adducts were obtained in
good yields despite as a 1:1 mixture of endo/exo isomers.16
Interestingly, we did not observe similar beneficial effects
cycloartenol (4), the C-8 stereogenic center of 1 was
proposed to be (S)-configured based on NMR analyses.
However, this assignment is not supported by the crystal-
lographic data.9
With the uncertainty of the structure of 1 in mind, we
developed a flexible approach that allows not only a facile
construction of its 5,6,7-tricyclic skeleton with the two
adjacent quaternary centers but also access to either config-
uration at the C-8 and C-9 positions (Figure 2). We
envisioned that the 6- and 7-membered rings could be formed
concurrently with an intramolecular [5+2] cycloaddition
reaction.10 In addition, we expected that it would be easier
to introduce the C-13 and C-14 adjacent quaternary centers
during an early stage of the synthesis. We anticipated that
photolysis of 7 would afford the cycloaddition adducts 8 and
9. Selective cleavage of their a and b linkages would then
(7) Cyathane diterpenoids also bear a 5,6,7-tricylic core skeleton. For
examples of their synthesis, see: (a) Snider, B. B.; Vo, N. H.; O’Neil, S.
V.; Foxman, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7644-7645. (b) Trost,
B. M.; Dong, L.; Schroeder, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2844-
2845. (c) Pfeiffer, M. W. B.; Phillips, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
5334-5335. (d) Waters, S. P.; Tian, Y.; Li, Y.-M.; Danishefsky, S. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13514-13515. (e) Ward, D. E.; Shen, J. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 2843-2846. (f) Watanabe, H.; Takano, M.; Umino, A.; Ito,
T.; Ishikawa, H.; Nakada, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 359-362. (g) Piers, E.;
Gilbert, M.; Cook, K. L. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1407-1410. (h) Wender, P.
A.; Bi, F. C.; Brodney, M. A.; Gosselin, F. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2105-
2108. (i) Magnus, P.; Shen, L. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 3553-3560. (j)
Dahnke, K. R.; Paquette, L. A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 885-899.
(8) There has been no report of synthetic studies on buxapentalactone.
For isolation of selected Buxus triterpenoids, see: (a) Atta-ur-Rahman,
Habib, N.; Asif, S. E.; Safdar, A.; Zahida, I.; Choudhary, M. I.; Clardy, J.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 3577-3584. (b) Be´ne´chie, M.; Khuong-Huu, F.
Tetrahedron 1976, 32, 701-707. (c) Guilhem, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975,
16, 2937-2938.
(11) (a) Wilzbach, K. E.; Kaplan, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 2066-
2067. (b) Bryce-Smith, D.; Gilbert, A.; Orger, B. H. Chem. Commun. 1966,
512-514.
(12) Reviews: (a) Wender, P. A.; Siggel, L.; Nuss, J. M., In Compre-
hensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Paquette, L. A., Eds.;
Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 5, pp 645-673. (b) Keukeleire, D.
D.; He, S. L. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 359-380. (c) Cornelisse, J. Chem.
ReV. 1993, 93, 615-669. (d) Hoffmann, N. Synthesis 2004, 481-495. (e)
Mattay, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 663-665.
(13) (a) Wender, P. A.; Howbert, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
688-690. (b) Wender, P. A.; Dreyer, G. B. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 4445-
4450. (c) Wender, P. A.; Howbert, J. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 3983-
3986.
(14) (a) Gilbert, A. Pure Appl. Chem. 1980, 52, 2669-2682. (b) Gilbert,
A.; Taylor, G. N. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979, 229-230. (c)
Gilbert, A.; Taylor, G. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 1761-
1768. (d) Ellis-Davies, G. C. R.; Gilbert, A.; Heath, P.; Lane, J. C.;
Warrington, J. V.; Westover, D. L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1984,
1833-1841. There is one exception reported by De Keukeleire and He.
Irradiation of a 3-(benzyloxymethyl)cyclopentene derivative at 254 nm in
cyclohexane-ethyl acetate (5:1) gave the meta-photocycloaddition product
in 42% yield: (e) De Keukeleire, D.; He, S.-L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1992, 419-420.
(9) The crystallographic data of 1 published by Sun and co-workers
(CCDC-254747) supports the (9R)-configuration instead. However, the
anisotropic displacement parameters for most atoms are not acceptable,
including 15 of them being non-positive definite. The published data do
not contain suitable information for reinterpretation.
(10) Reviews: (a) Battiste, M. A.; Pelphrey, P. M.; Wright, D. Chem.-
Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3438-3447. (b) Wender, P. A.; Gamber, G. G.; Williams,
T. J. In Modern Rhodium-Catalyzed Organic Reactions; Evans, P. A., Ed.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005; pp 263-299. (c) Wender, P. A.;
Love, J. A. AdV. Cycloaddit. 1999, 5, 1-45. (d) Mascaren˜as, J. L. AdV.
Cycloaddit. 1999, 6, 1-54.
(15) Wender and DeLong have found that photolysis of an oxygen-
bridged arene-olefin system with Hanovia medium-pressure mercury lamp
through Vycor glass in cyclohexane for 2 h provided the desired meta-
photocycloaddition products in 68% yield at 60% conversion based on
recovered starting material. Prolong irradiation led to product decomposition.
DeLong, M. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1992.
1224
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008