M. Waliczek et al.
Method 1B
used directly in the next step. The obtained ether solution
containing acetic anhydride (2.1 g, 20.6 mmol) and glacial
acetic acid (5.78 g, 96.2 mmol) was placed in two-necked,
round bottom flask equipped with thermometer. Then, the
zinc dust (1.92 g, 293 mmol) was added in small portions
over a period of 1.5 h with vigorous stirring at temperature
in the range of 40–50 °C. The exothermic reaction was
cooled in a water bath. After completion of the metal addi-
tion, the mixture was stirred for an additional 30 min. The
excess zinc powder was filtered and washed thoroughly
with three 10 ml portions of glacial acetic acid. The result-
ing filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure and
finally, thick oil was obtained.
HPLC: retention time (min): 8.8 (conditions for HPLC
found 210.081 calculated for (C8H13NO4 + Na)+ 210.074;
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm) = 1.29 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 2.04
(s, 3H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 4.25 (qd, J = 6.0 Hz, 3.0 Hz, 2H),
5.22 (d, J = 6.5, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm) = 14.19,
28.33, 62.88, 63.37, 166.30, 170.09, 198.87.
Synthesis of Z‑Thr(Atda)‑OBzl (2) This procedure
included the same synthetic step as described in Method 1A.
As a protecting group, 2,2,-dimetylopropan-1,3-diol was
used. The crude, oxidized product (0.51 g, 1.5 mmol) was
dissolved in toluene (60 ml) and then, 2,2,-dimetylopropan-
1,3-diol (0.60 g, 5.8 mmol) was added to this mixture with
p-toluenesulfonic acid (120 mg) as a catalyst. The resulting
mixture was refluxed for 2.5 h using a Dean-Stark apparatus
to remove water. After the reaction completion, the solvent
was evaporated under reduced pressure. HR-MS m/z: found
450.193 calculated for (C24H29NO6 + Na)+ 450.188.
Synthesis of Fmoc‑Thr(Atda)‑OH (3) The last two steps
consisted of hydrogenolysis and introduction of the Fmoc
group as described in Method 1A. Finally, the reaction prod-
uct was purified by chromatography on a silica gel. Impuri-
ties were eluted first using chloroform containing 3 % of
methanol, then, the reaction product was eluted using chlo-
roform containing 3 % of methanol and 0.15 % of acetic
acid.
Synthesis of Ac‑Thr(Atda)‑OEt (2*)
Yield: 60 %; HPLC: retention time (min): 31.5 (con-
tion). HR-MS m/z: found 448.172 calculated for
(C24H27NO6 + Na)+ 448.173; MS/MS (parent 448.171):
404.182; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm) = 7.74 (d, J = 7.5 Hz,
2H), 7.58 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.29
(td, J = 7.4 Hz, 0.9 Hz, 2H), 5.62 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 4.63
(d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (p, J = 10.6 Hz, 2H), 4.22 (t,
J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (dd, J = 45.9 Hz, 11.5 Hz, 2H), 3.55
(dd, J = 45.9 Hz, 11.5 Hz, 2H), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.10 (s, 3H),
0.82 (s,3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm) = 171.01, 156.55,
143.97, 141.50, 127.32, 127.29, 125.38, 120.17, 70.26,
70.23, 67.65, 59.87, 47.31, 30.24, 23.13, 22.56, 16.57.
The carbonylated product (0.5 g, 2.6 mmol) was dissolved
in toluene (60 ml) and 2,2-dimethyl-propane-1,3-diol
(1.08 g, 10.3 mmol), and p-toluenesulfonic acid as a cat-
alyst (150 mg) were added. The resulting mixture was
refluxed for 2.5 h using a Dean-Stark apparatus. After the
reaction completion, the solvent was evaporated under
reduced pressure (Green and Wuts 1999). HR-MS m/z:
found 296.141 calculated for (C13H23NO5 + Na)+ 296.147.
Synthesis of Fmoc‑Thr(Atda)‑OH (3*)
To remove the C and N protecting groups, the alkaline
hydrolysis with 3.5 M NaOH was carried out for 48 h. The
reaction was controlled with a ninhydrin test. After the
hydrolysis was completed, the resulting strongly alkaline
mixture was used in the next step. It was brought to pH 8
with concentrated hydrochloric acid and treated with Fmoc-
OSu (0.90 g, 2.56 mmol) in acetone, to reach the conditions
for introducing the Fmoc-protecting group described in this
paper (Method 1A or 1B). Finally, the reaction product was
purified as described in Method 1B.
Synthesis
of Fmoc‑amino(2,5,5‑trimetyhyl‑1,3‑dioxolan‑2‑yl)
acetic acid (Method 2)
Synthesis of Ac‑Thr(O)‑OEt (1*)
Ethyl acetoacetate (1 g, 7.63 mmol) was placed in two-
necked, round bottom flask equipped with a thermometer
and a magnetic stirrer. After cooling in the ice bath, gla-
cial acetic acid (1.4 ml) and water (2 ml) were added with
stirring. Sodium nitrite (1.58 g, 45.8 mmol) was added in
portions over 1.5 h with the temperature kept constant at
about 5 °C. Then, the ice bath was removed and the stir-
ring was continued for 4 h. At that time, the temperature
increased to 34–38 °C within 2 h and then decreased to
about 29 °C. The reaction product was extracted with die-
thyl ether (3 × 10 ml). The combined organic layers were
Yield: 60 %; HPLC: retention time (min): 31.5 (conditions
for HPLC are given in the Experimental section). HR-MS
m/z: found 448.173 calculated for (C24H27NO6 + Na)+
448.173; MS/MS (parent 448.173) 404.180.
Peptide preparation
The model peptides were prepared on a solid support
according to the standard Fmoc protocol (Chan and White
1 3