Short r/â-Peptides as Catalysts for Intra- and
Intermolecular Aldol Reactions
Valerio D’Elia, Hans Zwicknagl, and Oliver Reiser*
Institut fu¨r Organische Chemie, UniVersita¨t Regensburg,
UniVersita¨tsstr. 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
FIGURE 1. Transition-state model for the (L)-proline-catalyzed aldol
reaction (left) and the cis-â-ACC enantiomers 2 and 1 used in this
study.
ReceiVed January 22, 2008
ties, we set out to explore if the â-ACCs would also be useful
building blocks for peptidic organocatalysts. We would like to
disclose here short R,â-peptides containing the unnatural cis-
â-ACCs 2 and 1 (Figure 1 and Scheme 1) that allow inter-
and intramolecular aldol reactions to be carried out with high
yields and enantioselectivity.
SCHEME 1. Standard Reaction Scheme for the Synthesis
of Peptides with Central and Terminal â-ACC Units
Short R/â-peptides, containing conformationally restricted
cis-â-aminocyclopropylcarboxylic acid units as turn-inducing
elements, have been found to be efficient catalysts for inter-
and intramolecular aldol reactions. The tripeptide H-(L)-
Pro-2-(L)-Pro-OH was identified to perform especially well
in homogeneous and heterogeneous aqueous solutions as well
as in organic solvents.
The aldol reaction represents one of the most powerful tools
available for C-C bond formation. In the last years several
efforts have been directed to create metal-free catalysts that
would allow high yield and selectivity for this reaction. With
the pioneering work of Hajos and Parrish and Eder et al.,1 it
became apparent that (L)-proline arguably represents the best
example of a naturally available organocatalyst. Its unique mode
of action, i.e., both the amino and the carboxylic acid func-
tionality of the catalyst cooperate in activating and arranging
the reagents2 (Figure 1), recalls the biological activity of the
enzyme type I aldolase.3 However, proline does not currently
represent the most efficient organocatalyst for this process
because of the solvent choice necessary (DMSO) to be an
effective catalyst.4
â-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acids (â-ACCs) have proved
to greatly stabilize secondary structures even in short peptides
when combined with natural R-amino acids, which has led to
the synthesis of a novel class of foldamers5 as well as to ligands
with high affinity and selectivity for specific neuropeptide Y
and integrin receptors.6 On the basis of these structural proper-
Taking the excellent results of Wennemers and co-workers7
into account, who demonstrated the benefits of (L)-proline in
tripeptide catalysts for the aldol reaction, we concentrated on
combinations of at least one of this residue with 2 or 1.
The shelf-stable building block 2 required for the incorpora-
tion of â-ACC into peptides is readily accessible from N-Boc-
pyrrole in either enantiomeric form.8 Since we could not forsee
which â-ACC enantiomer would be more effective in combina-
tion with naturally occurring R-amino acids, we wanted to
investigate peptides with both 2 or 1 being incorporated.
Therefore, it was more efficient to synthesize dipeptides using
the racemic rather than the enantiomerically pure â-ACCs
following the in situ coupling strategy developed by us9 and
separate the resulting diastereomers by column chromatography
(Scheme 1). Subsequent deprotection at the C-terminus and
coupling with amino acids or peptides cleanly resulted in the
corresponding tri- and tetrapeptides.
(6) (a) Koglin, N.; Zorn, C.; Beumer, R.; Cabrele, C.; Bubert, C.; Sewald,
N.; Reiser O.; Beck-Sickinger, A. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
202. (b) Urman, S.; Gaus, K.; Yang, Y.; Strijowski, U.; Sewald, N.; De
Pol, S.; Reiser, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3976.
(7) (a) Krattinger, P.; Kovasy, R.; Revell, J. D.; Ivan, S.; Wennemers,
H. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1101. (b) (b) Revell, J. D.; Wennemers, H.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 8420.
(1) (a) Hajos, Z. G.; Parrish, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 1615. (b)
Eder, U.; Sauer, G.; Wiechert, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1971, 10, 496.
(2) (a) Hoang, L.; Bahmanyar, S.; Houk, K. N.; List, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 16. (b) Bahmanyar, S.; Houk, K. N.; Martin, H. J.; List, B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2475.
(3) Jarvo, E. R.; Miller, S. J. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 2481.
(4) List, B.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas C. F., III J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 2395.
(5) (a) De Pol, S.; Zorn, C.; Klein, C. D.; Zerbe, O.; Reiser, O. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 511.
(8) (a) Gheorghe, A.; Schulte, M.; Reiser, O. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
2173. (b) Beumer, R.; Bubert, C.; Cabrele, C.; Vielhauer, O.; Pietzsch, M.;
Reiser, O. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8960.
(9) (a) Bubert, C.; Cabrele, C.; Reiser, O. Synlett 1997, 827. (b) Voigt,
J.; Noltemeyer, M.; Reiser, O. Synlett 1997, 202.
10.1021/jo800168h CCC: $40.75 © 2008 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/15/2008
3262
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3262-3265