(entry 6). With oxygen functionality in the homopropargylic
position (alkynes 14), the reaction was efficient for a variety
of unsaturated alcohols (allyl alcohol entries 7 and 10; and
homologues entries 8, 9 and 11,12). Slightly poorer yield of
the homologous diene 15E was obtained under the standard
conditions. From entry 13, it can be seen that remote nitrogen
functionality results in modest yields of diene 17.10 However,
these reactions were not reoptimized from the standard
conditions. The simple hydrocarbon 1-octyne performed
acceptably in entry 14.10 The propargyl-substituted substrate
4 (Scheme 2) did not perform well in the metathesis with
allyl alcohol 7 for reasons that are not completely understood.
Last, the metathesis in entry 1 was performed on a 15 mmol
scale, showing that the process is scaleable. In all of these
cases, a mixture of E and Z isomers is obtained.
diene. Heating the reaction depicted in Table 1, entry 3, for
an extended time period (18 h) gave an improvement of the
kinetic 1.5:1 ratio of (E/Z)-11C (70% isolated yield, Table
1) to exclusively E-isomer. However, inspection of the crude
1H NMR spectrum revealed that an additional product had
formed with unique vinylic resonances at δ 6.38 (dd, J )
15, 11 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (d, J )11 Hz, 1H), and 5.71 (dt, J )
15, 7 Hz, 1H) ppm, consistent with a terminally substituted
diene substructure (Scheme 3). On the basis of these data,
Scheme 3. Trapping of Isomerization Intermediate
The rapid reactions led us to investigate the magnitude of
the accelerated reaction rate compared to that of simple
alkenes.11 We conducted a competition experiment using
propargyl benzoate 6a and 1 equiv each of 1-hexene and
allyl alcohol 7. After heating for 20 min at 55 °C, the reaction
was quenched with 5 and the crude product ratio was
determined by 1H NMR analysis against an internal standard
(mesitylene). We found 40% (E)-diene derived from allyl
alcohol 7 and 17% (E)-diene from 1-hexene. Under these
conditions, this experiment shows that there is a ca. 2.3-
fold rate enhancement by free hydroxyl functionality in enyne
metathesis.12 This is in accord with Hoye and Zhao’s findings
in the ring-closing alkene metathesis using the first generation
Grubbs carbene. The finding also strongly suggests an
alkylidene first mechanism with this 1-alkyne. It is the first
indication that we know of that different substitution on the
alkene affects rate in the cross enyne metathesis. Alkene
reactivity forms the basis for the selectivity model advanced
by the Grubbs group for cross alkene metathesis.13
we gathered that a 1,5-hydride shift had occurred. Unfortu-
nately, this byproduct could not be separated from the diene
(E)-11C.
The products were separated after an in situ cycloaddition
of the (E)-diene. We reasoned that putative hydride shift
product 19 would exist in the s-trans conformation, making
it unreactive in the thermal cycloaddition. The thermal
cycloaddition with N-phenyl maleimide provided cycloadduct
20 in 36% yield along with recovered 19, obtained in 33%
yield. The major (E)-diene 11C underwent [4 + 2] cycload-
dition cleanly, whereas the isomeric product s-trans-19 was
recovered unchanged from the reaction. At this stage, the
products could be separated and their structures indepen-
dently established by spectroscopic techniques. Diene s-trans-
19 presumably came from the intermediate Z-isomer 11C
by a 1,5-hydride shift (eq 4), though it was unclear what
promoted this reactivity. Equilibrium presumably favors 19
due to greater alkyl substitution on the resulting 1,3-diene.
Longer reaction times affected the product distribution.
Though alkyne consumption was complete in less than an
hour, we investigated extended heating of the reaction in an
attempt to obtain higher E-selectivity. On the basis of earlier
work,14 it was expected that a secondary, E-selective
alkene-diene metathesis would upgrade the ratio of (E)-
(6) (a) Lynn, D. M.; Mohr, B.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 1627–1628. (b) Connon, S. J.; Blechert, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2002, 12, 1873–1876. (c) Binder, J. B.; Blank, J. J.; Raines, R. T. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 4885–4888. (d) Gallivan, J. P.; Jordan, J. P.; Grubbs, R. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2577–2580. (e) Hong, S. H.; Grubbs, R.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3508–3509. (f) Jordan, J. P.; Grubbs, R. H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5152–5155.
(7) Imahori, T.; Ojima, H.; Tateyama, H.; Mihara, Y.; Takahata, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 265–268.
(8) Stragies, R.; Schuster, M.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 2518–2520.
(9) Galan, B. R.; Kalbarczyk, K. P.; Szczepankiewicz, S.; Keister, J. B.;
Diver, S. T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1203–1206.
(10) Complete consumption of the alkyne was observed.
(11) (a) For a rate study of enyne metathesis with 1-hexene: Galan, B. R.;
Giessert, A. J.; Keister, J. B.; Diver, S. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
5762–5763. (b) DFT calculations: Lippstreu, J. J.; Straub, B. F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 7444–7457.
(4)
(12) Alkene homodimerization was not detected. The reaction was run
to partial alkyne conversion and gave clean conversion to the diene products
of enyne metathesis. Further rate studies are being pursued.
(13) Chatterjee, A. K.; Choi, T.-L.; Sanders, D. P.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11360–11370.
The causative agent for the hydride shift was investigated
further. Control studies were carried out on the purified diene
(E/Z)-11C. When this E/Z mixture was purified away from
(14) Giessert, A. J.; Diver, S. T. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1046–1049.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 10, 2008
2057