Te11d) to an acetylenic sulfoxide and proceed in good yield
and stereoselectively. However, they are essentially limited
to the formation of C-C bonds12 and are not compatible
with bases or reducing agent sensitive functional groups.
Acyclic vinylsulfoxides substituted by a heteroatom (O, N,
S) in the ꢀ position have also drawn a lot of attention, but
only a few syntheses are stereoselective. In this context, there
is still a need to develop a mild and neutral synthesis which
enables us to prepare acyclic ꢀ,ꢀ′-disubstituted vinylsulfox-
ides bearing not only alkyl and aryl but also heteroatomic
substituents in good yield and with high stereocontrol.
investigate further this reaction as a potential new access to
acyclic ꢀ,ꢀ′-disubstituted vinylsulfoxides.
In a first step, we tested the viability of our approach by
studying the reactivity and the diastereoselectivity of the
ꢀ-elimination. Our systems differ from others by the presence
of a tertiary stereogenic carbon, and we designed different
precursors to investigate its influence. The diastereoselectivity
was examined from two diastereomeric bis-sulfoxides 1a15a
and 2, prepared, respectively, by addition of MeCu·LiI and
Me3ZnLi on an alkylidene bis-sulfoxide. When heated at 70
°C in toluene, 1a and 2 gave vinylsulfoxides 3a and 4,
respectively, in high yield (Scheme 1). The double bond
We recently reported the diastereoselective Michael ad-
dition of nucleophiles and radicals onto alkylidene bis-
sulfoxides13 affording enantiopure ꢀ,ꢀ′-disubstituted bis-
sulfoxides.14,15 In the course of these studies, we noticed
some adducts were prone to spontaneously ꢀ-eliminate a
molecule of sulfenic acid at room temperature to generate
ꢀ,ꢀ′-disubstituted vinylsulfoxides (Scheme 1).14,15 Although
the ꢀ-elimination of sulfenic acid has been extensively
studied16 and has found applications for the synthesis of
alkenes or R,ꢀ-unsaturated carbonyls,17 only a limited
number of examples involved bis-sulfoxides.18 Interestingly,
Trost described two examples of condensation of the lithium
anion of bis(phenylsulfinyl)-methane with a primary alkyl
halide followed by in situ elimination of sulfenic acid to
afford only E vinylsulfoxides.19 This encouraged us to
Scheme 1. Thermolysis of Diastereomeric ꢀ,ꢀ′-Disubstituted
Bis-Sulfoxides: A Stereospecific Reaction
configurations were attributed by NOE and 13C NMR
γ-effect.20 These reactions are completely stereospecific with
regard to the carbon stereogenic center, and in both experi-
ments, no trace of the other diastereomer was detected.
The ꢀ-elimination proceeded quite rapidly at moderate
temperature,21 and we examined if the steric strain in the
starting material might play a significant role. Thus, we
prepared bis-sulfoxide 5 by Meerwein-Ponndorf-Verley
reduction of the adequate alkylidene bis-sulfoxide with
lithium ethoxide, as well as 6 by condensation of the lithium
anion of (SS,SS)-bis(p-tolylsulfinyl)methane onto 5-bro-
mopentene. When heated at 70 °C, 5 and 6 afforded only
the corresponding (E) vinylsulfoxides 7 and 8, respectively,
but with moderate yield and extended reaction time (Scheme
2). So the steric strain induced by both sulfoxide moieties
and the substituents on the ꢀ-carbon would ease the elimina-
tion reaction, a finding which was already rationalized for
simple sulfoxides by a steric destabilization of the starting
material and release of the steric strain in the transition
state.16
(7) (a) Mourie`s, V.; Delouvrie´, B.; Lacoˆte, E.; Fensterbank, L.; Malacria,
M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 1776–1787. (b) Varghese, J. P.; Knochel, P.;
Marek, I. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2849–2852. See also: (c) Sklute, G.; Amsallem,
D.; Shabli, A.; Varghese, J. P.; Marek, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
11776–11777.
(8) Zhao, Y.; Higashihara, T.; Sugiyama, K.; Hirao, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 14158–14159.
(9) Marino, J. P.; Rubio, M. B.; Cao, G.; De Dios, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 13398–13399.
(10) Chernysheva, N. A.; Gusarova, N. K.; Trofimov, B. A. Russ. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 36, 1–23.
(11) (a) Truce, W. E.; Lusch, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2252–
2258. (b) Alonso, I.; Carretero, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4453–4456.
(c) Maezaki, N.; Sawamoto, H.; Yoshigami, R.; Suzuki, T.; Tanaka, T. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 1345–1347. (d) Xu, Q.; Huang, X.; Ni, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 2981–2984. (e) Xu, Q.; Huang, C.-Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004,
45, 5657–5660.
(12) Only rare examples of intermolecular addition of heteroatomic
nucleophiles onto substituted acetylenic sulfoxides have been reported. See:
(a) McMullen, C. H.; Stirling, C. J. M. J. Chem. Soc. (B) 1966, 121, 7–
1220. (b) Maezaki, N.; Yagi, S.; Yoshigami, R.; Maeda, J.; Suzuki, T.;
Ohsawa, S.; Tsukamoto, K.; Tanaka, T. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5550–
5558.
(13) For the synthesis of alkylidene bis-sulfoxides see: Delouvrie´, B.;
Najera, F.; Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002,
643-644, 130–135.
(14) Brebion, F.; Vitale, M.; Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2889–2896
.
(15) (a) Brebion, F.; Delouvrie´, B.; Najera, F.; Fensterbank, L.; Malacria,
M.; Vaissermann, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5342–5345. (b)
Brebion, F.; Goddard, J.-P.; Louis Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M. Synthesis
2005, 2449–2452. (c) Brebion, F.; Goddard, J.-P.; Gomez, C.; Fensterbank,
L.; Malacria, M. Synlett 2006, 713–716. (d) For recent work on bis-sulfinyl
derivatives: Goddard, J.-P.; Gomez, C.; Brebion, F.; Beauvie`re, S.;
Scheme 2. Thermolysis of ꢀ-Monosubstituted Bis-Sulfoxides
Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2929–2931
.
(16) (a) Cubbage, J. W.; Guo, Y.; McCulla, R. D.; Jenks, W. S. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 8722–8736, and references cited therein. (b) McCulla,
R. D.; Jenks, W. S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7871–7879.
(17) (a) Trost, B. M. Chem. ReV. 1978, 78, 363–382. (b) Trost, B. M.
Acc. Chem. Res. 1978, 11, 453–461.
(18) (a) Carretero, J. C.; Garcia Ruano, J. L.; Martin Cabrejas, L. M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 409–416. (b) Boivin, J.; Chauvet, C.;
Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4913–4916.
(19) Trost, B. M.; Bridges, A. J. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 2014–16.
1918
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 10, 2008