Nakamura et al.
approximately -6.5 and -11, respectively.13 In the case of
cyanopropionates, the electron-withdrawing nature of the sub-
stituents (ester and nitrile) will reduce the basicity of each
individual functionality. When TFSA/TFA ) 1:1, a mixture in
which the acidity (H0) is estimated to be -11.2, was used as
the reaction medium, either the ester carbonyl oxygen atom or
the cyano nitrogen atom of the cyanopropionates should be
protonated, with the former being favored.13 Under these
conditions, however, the cyclization product 13a was not
obtained at all, as described above. Therefore, these results
indicated that cations bearing either the O-protonated ester
carbonyl group or N-protonated cyano group have an insufficient
entraining effect to increase the reactivity of the inert cyano
group in the geminal arrangement.
TABLE 3. Acidity Dependence of the Cyclization Reaction
yield (%)
5a 13a
entry
ratio of the acids (TFSA:TFA)
H0
1
2
3
4
5
100:0
99:1
9:1
1:1
0:100
-14.1
-13.6
-13.0
-11.2
-2.7
0
2
3
62
100
72
64
53
0
0
TABLE 4. 13C NMR Analysis of Methyl Cyanoacetate in Solutions
of Varying Acidity
13C NMR signals
Direct Observation of Distonic Dications. We also carried
out direct spectroscopic observation of cationic species formed
from a model compound, methyl cyanoacetate, in various acidic
media (Table 4). As the acidity of the medium was increased,
the ester carbonyl carbon atom was deshielded, whereas the
cyano carbon atom was shielded in the 13C NMR spectra. After
consideration of the perturbations of the 13C chemical shifts
arising from the solvent effect,14 the observed acidity-dependent
changes of the chemical shifts were consistent with those arising
from protonation of the ester carbonyl oxygen atom and that of
thenitrilenitrogenatom,respectively,asreportedpreviously.11b,12f,15
There are small differences in the 13C chemical shifts of the
species formed in TFSA and in a more acidic medium, i.e.,
TFSA containing 1% (w/w) SbF5 (H0 ≈ -17). All these data
are consistent with the postulate that the O,N-diprotonated
dication (18) of methyl cyanoacetate, a distonic dication, is
formed in the strong acid, and is a de facto electrophile in the
present cyclization reaction of arylcyanopropionates. The ex-
perimentally observed changes of the 13C chemical shifts of the
species formed in TFSA, as compared with the neutral state,
were in good agreement with those of GIAO calculation for
the O,N-diprotonated dication, i.e., low-field shift of the carbonyl
carbon atom upon protonation of the carbonyl group and high-
field shift of the nitrile carbon atom upon protonation of nitrile
nitrogen atom in the 13C NMR spectra (Table 5).16,17 This also
supports the present conclusion concerning the formation of the
O,N-diprotonated dication (18). When toluene was added to a
solvent/acid
H0
CHCl3
TFA
TFA:TFSA (1:1)
TFA:TFSA (1:9)
TFSA
n/a
24.7, 53.7, 113.7, 164.0
23.4, 53.9, 111.4, 166.7
23.9, 55.2, 110.1, 168.5
24.3, 57.1, 109.0, 171.4
24.6, 59.7, 107.6, 175.2
24.6, 60.4, 107.2, 176.2
-2.7
-11
-13
-14
-17
TFSA (1% SbF5)
dicyanide 4 in TFSA-d under similar reaction conditions (see
ref 9). This observation is in sharp contrast to the case of 3-aryl-
2-nitropropionate, in which deprotonation of the R-proton
occurred in TFSA, and this deprotonation process was rate-
determining.1 Furthermore, methyl 2-methyl-2-cyano-4-phenyl-
butyrate, in which the R-proton was replaced with a methyl
group, afforded a cyclized keto ester in a low yield of 17%
when it was treated with TFSA (25 °C, 48 h), followed by
aqueous workup (Table 1, entry 13). This result excluded
involvement of loss of the R-proton in the cyclization process.
(b) Acidity Dependence of Reactions. Reaction of 5a
showed acidity dependence: the reaction rate (in terms of the
product yield after 48 h) increased as the acidity of the reaction
medium was increased by mixing TFSA into TFA (Tables 3
and 4).10–12 The reaction proceeded in a 99:1 (w/w) or 9:1 (w/
w) mixture of TFSA/TFA to afford 13a in slightly lower yield
(64% or 53%, respectively) than in TFSA (72% yield) (entries
1-3), while no cyclized product 13a was obtained and 5a was
recovered in part when TFSA/TFA ) 1:1 (w/w) (entry 4) or
TFA alone (entry 5) was used. The basicity values of ester
carbonyl oxygen atoms and nitrile nitrogen atoms are typically
(13) Arnet, E. M. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1963, 1, 223–403.
(14) These changes of the chemical shifts should be partially due to solvent
effects, i.e., differences in polarity and hydrogen-bonding ability of CDCl3 and
TFA. In these solvents, no protonation of the carbonyl oxygen atom or the cyano
(9) To 100 equiv of TFSA-d was added 300 µmol of the substrate at 0 °C.
The reaction mixture was stirred for 7 h at 25 °C, then poured into 20 mL of
D2O, and extracted with CHCl3. The organic phase was washed with saturated
NaCl, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure to give a
residue. The residue was column-chromatographed on silica gel. Removal of
the solvent afforded the substrate 1a in 32% yield and the product 2a in 29%
yield. 1H NMR spectra of the crude product and of the separated recovered
substrate indicated that no proton or deuterium at the methylene position was
exchanged under the reaction conditions.
nitrogen atom occurred, judging from the pKBH values. In TFA, the 13C carbon
+
of the ester carbonyl atom was deshielded (2.7 ppm) and that of the nitrile carbon
atom was shielded (2.3 ppm), as compared with those in CDCl3. On the other
hand, the magnitude of the chemical shift changes observed in going from TFA
to TFSA-SbF5 was larger than in the case of going from CDCl3 to TFA.
(15) (a) Levy, G. C.; Cargioli, J. D.; Racela, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970,
92, 6238–6246. (b) Olah, G. A.; Westerman, P. W. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38,
1986–1992.
(10) (a) Hammett, L. P.; Deyrup, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932, 54, 2721–
2739. (b) Paul, M. A.; Long, F. A. Chem. ReV. 1957, 57, 1–45. (c) Jorgenson,
J. J.; Hartter, D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 878–883. (d) Ryabova, R. S.
Zh. Fiz. Khim. 1966, 40, 339–345.
(16) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montogomery, J. A., Jr.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.;
Millam, J. M. Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.;
Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Peterson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.;
Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.;
Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross,
J. B.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.;
Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C. ; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma,
K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, G.; Dapprich, S.;
Daniels, A. K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford,
S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi,
I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.;
Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.;
Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh,
PA, 2003.
(11) (a) Saito, S.; Saito, S.; Ohwada, T.; Shudo, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991,
39, 2718–2720. (b) Saito, S.; Sato, Y.; Ohwada, T.; Shudo, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 2312–2317.
(12) For recent representative studies on the acidity dependence of superacid-
catalyzed organic reactions, see: (a) Olah, G. A.; Mathew, T.; Marinez, E. R.;
Esteves, P. M.; Etzkorn, M.; Rasul, G.; Prakash, G. K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 11556–11561. (b) Klumpp, D. A.; Baek, D. N.; Prakash, G. K. S.;
Olah, G. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6666–6671. (c) Yokoyama, A.; Ohwada,
T.; Shudo, K. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 611–617. (d) Ohwada, T.; Suzuki, T.;
Shudo, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4629–4637. (e) Ohwada, T.; Yamazaki,
T.; Suzuki, T.; Saito, S.; Shudo, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6220–6224.
(f) Sato, Y.; Yato, M.; Ohwada, T.; Saito, S.; Shudo, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 3037–3043.
(17) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. (b) Wolinski,
K.; Hinton, J. F.; Pulay, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8251–8260.
4222 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 11, 2008