exert a similar steric effect,25 the smooth oxidation of 10
with molecular dioxygen occurred to a negligible extent, as
for the unsuccessful oxygenation of 11. The thermal oxida-
tion shown in Table 1 was therefore induced by a silicon
atom through its electronic effect. As second control experi-
ments, we irradiated toluene solutions of 1 and 4, separately,
with UV light (λ >300 nm) near 23 °C instead of 110 °C;
enone 12 was not detectably generated. We conclude
accordingly that 3-silyl-1-cyclohexenyl ethers or acetates (i.e.,
1 or 4) react with molecular dioxygen to produce the
corresponding enones through a thermal, rather than a
photochemical, process.
Scheme 2
.
Proposed Mechanism for the Conversion of Enol
Acetate 4 to 3-Silyl Enone 12
We considered whether the newly developed reaction
produces radical intermediates. Repeating the conversion 2
f 12 under conditions similar to those described above, we
added 4-methyl-2,6-di(tert-butyl)phen-1-ol (1.0 equiv) to the
reaction mixture. This phenol functions as an efficient
scavenger of peroxyl radical.26 After 4.0 h, we recovered
the starting material 2 in 17% yield and detected no enone
12 by GC-mass spectrometry. These results indicate that
peroxyl radical intermediates were likely generated in the
reactions shown in Table 1.
The enol acetate moiety is known to be stable27 and cannot
be oxidized to the corresponding enone with air at 110 °C
(see 10 and 11 in Table 1). Oxidation of enol ethers to the
corresponding enones can be accomplished; however, it
requires a catalyst Pd0/SiO2.28 On the other hand, a silyl
group at the allylic position acts as an activating group for
alkene toward oxidation.29 The effect of silyl groups can be
attributed to the orbital interaction between the π-orbital of
the carbon to carbon double bond and the C-Si σ bond.30
The allylsilane moiety can be oxidized with easy because
of the electron-donating ability of ꢀ-silyl group.31 Combining
this information and our experimental results, we propose a
plausible mechanism shown in Scheme 2, in which the
conversion 4 f 12 serves as a representative example.
“σ-π hyperconjugation.”1c This stabilization was absent
from the corresponding radical intermediate generated on
oxygenation of nonsilylated enol acetates 10 and 11.
After the energy barrier of the step 4 f 16a was overcome,
the resultant intermediate 16a could alter its conformation
to 16b. Although the former is thermodynamically more
stable than the latter, equilibrium exists between these two
conformational isomers. The isomer 16b allows an intramo-
lecular transfer of hydrogen to take place from a carbon atom
to an oxygen atom. Monodeoxygenation32 subsequently
occurs in the resultant peroxide 17 to afford hydroxy acetate
18; extrusion of acetic acid in situ then furnishes final product
12. The entire process has the same outcome as an ene-type
reaction. For a typical ene reaction involving molecular
dioxygen as an enophile,33 the reactive species is molecular
dioxygen in its first excited singlet state, O2 (1∆g), which
requires UV light and a dye as a sensitizer. In contrast, we
found that the reactions shown in Table 1 proceeded in the
dark; they thus conform to an “ene type” reaction.
Through computation with the CVFF force field, we
obtained the thermodynamically most stable conformation
of 4 by energy minimization. Addition of molecular dioxygen
to enol acetate 4 might occur at an elevated temperature from
the anti face of the activating SiMe3 group to give peroxyl
radical 16a. Because of the possible coplanarity exerted by
the radical orbital, the C-C bond, and the C-Si bond in
•
the moiety C-C-Si of 16a, the carboradical center can
Molecular dioxygen might abstract the hydrogen R to the
SiMe3 group in 4 to generate an allylic carboradical center
that becomes stabilized by the silyl group through an R
effect.34 Pioneering works reported by Nickon,35 Schenck,36
Foote,37 and co-workers indicate that the double bond in the
hydroperoxide product is invariably shifted to a position
adjacent to the original double bond in an ene reaction. A
become stabilized by a ꢀ silyl group, predominantly through
(26) Burton, G. W.; Doba, T.; Gabe, E. J.; Hughes, L.; Lee, F. L.; Prasad,
L.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 7053–7065.
(27) Minami, I.; Takahashi, K.; Shimizu, I.; Kimura, T.; Tsuji, J.
Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 2971–2977.
(28) Baba, T.; Nakano, K.; Nishiyama, S.; Tsuruya, S.; Masai, M.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 1697–1699.
(29) Yoshida, J.; Nishiwaki, K. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998, 2589–
2596.
(32) Shul’pin, G. B.; Su¨ss-Fink, G.; Lindsay-Smith, J. R. Tetrahedron
1999, 55, 5345–5358.
(30) For related reports, see: (a) Giordan, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983,
105, 6544–6546. (b) Bock, H.; Kaim, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
4429–4438. (c) Brown, R. S.; Eaton, D. F.; Hosomi, A.; Traylor, T. G.;
Wright, J. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974, 66, 249–254. (d) Traylor, T. G.;
Hanstein, W.; Berwin, H. J.; Clinton, N. A.; Brown, R. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1971, 93, 5715–5725. (e) Hanstein, W.; Berwin, H. J.; Traylor, T. G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 829–836.
(33) Hoffmann, H. M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 556–
577.
(34) Doncaster, A. M.; Walsh, R. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1976,
72, 2908–2916.
(35) Nickon, A.; Bagli, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 1498–1508.
(36) Gollnick, K.; Schenck, G. O. Pure Appl. Chem. 1964, 9, 507–525.
(37) Foote, C. S.; Wexler, R.; Ando, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 46,
4111–4118.
(31) Yoshida, J.; Murata, T.; Isoe, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3373–
3376.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 10, 2008
1915