pyridyl-C3), 6.71–6.72 (m, 3 H, signal of mesitylene, CH), 6.77–6.80
(m, 2 H, pyridyl-C5), 6.83 (s, 4 H, m-CH), 6.89 (dt, 4J(H,H) = 1.7 Hz
3J(H,H) = 7.6 Hz, 2 H, pyridyl-C4), 7.09–7.12 (m, 1 H, p-Ph),
7.20–7.22 (m, 2 H, o-Ph), 7.27–7.30 (m, 2 H, m-Ph), 10.07 (d,
3J(H,H) = 4.3 Hz, pyridyl-C6). 13C NMR (125.77 MHz, C6D6): d
21.3 (CH3, signal of mesitylene), 21.6 (CH3, p-CH3), 29.7 (CH3, o-
CH3), 43.2 (CH3, N–CH3), 55.7, 61.1 (CH2), 115.2 (C, pyrazole-C3,4,5),
122.3 (CH, pyridyl-C3), 123.1 (CH, pyridyl-C5), 124.5 (CH, m-CH),
127.4 (CH, signal of mesitylene), 128.1 (CH (masked by benzene
signal), m-, p-Ph), 129.0 (CH, o-Ph), 135.5 (C), 135.9 (CH, pyridyl-
C4), 137.0, 137.6 (C), 137.6 (C, signal of mesitylene), 144.6 (C), 152.4
(CH, pyridyl-C6), 153.4, 157.9 (C). MS (ESI in THF): m/z (rel.
copper atoms show nearly linear coordination (average of
O–Cu–Cipso-angles 175.3(3)1), whereas the copper ions hosted
by the chelating pyrazolate ligands are found in a distorted
tetrahedral environment. The distortion of the (m4-O)CuI4 unit
from an ideal tetrahedron is reflected by the Cu–O–Cu-angles
that range from 94.75(19)1 to 124.6(3)1. All Cu–O bonds
(average length 1.851(5) A) are quite short and similar to
those of I, but significantly shorter than those of the well-
known CuII complexes of type [L4CuII4(m-O)X6] (L = mono-
dentate ligand, X = halogen).12,17 Drastic distortion of the
{N3C} coordination sphere of the peripheral CuI ions from
tetrahedral is caused by the constraints of the binding pockets
of 2. An additional contribution might arise from closed-shell
Cuꢁ ꢁ ꢁCu-contacts that—if considered as such—would lead to
a description of the Cu(5–8) environment as pseudo trigonal-
bipyramidal.
intensity) = 657.0 (24) [(1)Cu2Mes + 1]+, 537.2 (100) [(1)Cu2]+
.
y Crystal data for 3: C86H98N12OCu8ꢁ4.63C4H8O, M = 2157.56,
monoclinic, P21/c, a = 23.249(5), b = 32.447(7), c=26.971(5) A, b
= 92.42(3)1, V = 20 328(7) A3, Z = 8, T = 100(2) K, 160 032
reflections measured (yellow needle, 2.13 r y r 59.851), 29 068 unique
(R(int) = 0.0998), 2836 parameter. Data were collected on a Bruker
three circle diffractometer with a SMART 6000 detector and Cu-Ka
radiation (l = 1.54178 A) at low temperature. The structure was
solved using direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares
procedures against F2. Non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropi-
cally, hydrogen atoms were added using the riding model. Since all
THF molecules are disordered and the THF oxygen could not be
located, the solvent molecules were refined first as cyclopentane and
later with THF-restrains from the PRODRG dungee server.19 R1
(Fo 4 4sFo) = 0.0703, wR2 = 0.1767, GoF = 1.365. CCDC 666842.
For crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see
DOI: 10.1039/b717571j.
The Cu–C bond lengths and Cu–Cipso–Cu angles (average
73.5(2)1) as well as the CuꢁꢁꢁCu-separations (average 2.4286(14)
A) within the Cu(m-Mes)Cu bridging units of 3 are in good
agreement with the corresponding values determined for
[Cu10O2(Mes)6] and parent [CuMes]5, respectively.12,16 However,
bridging of the mesityl groups is rather asymmetric, since the
Cu–C bonds to the central O-bound copper atoms (average
1.920(7) A) are significantly shorter than those to the peripheral
copper atoms hosted by the pyrazolate ligands (average 2.131(7)
A). As a consequence, the mesityl rings are leaning towards the
outer copper centres (although without any p-contacts), which is
evident from the relatively small Cu(5–8)–Cipso–Cpara angles that
lie in the range 118–1271, clearly different from the angles
Cu(1–4)–CipsoCpara (160–1691). Complex 3 can thus be viewed
as a heteroleptic cuprate anion [(MesCuI)4(m4-O)]2ꢀ that is
flanked and stabilised by two cations [(2)CuI2]+. This rare motif
is distinct from most of the hitherto known organocopper(I)
compounds. Only a few of those, like 8-(dimethylamino)-
naphthylcopper(I), feature a homoleptic organocuprate as a
structural theme.18
1 (a) N. Kitajima and Y. Moro-oka, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 737; (b) J. I.
van der Vlugt and F. Meyer, Top. Organomet. Chem., 2007, 22, 191.
2 P. Siemsen, R. C. Livingston and F. Diederich, Angew. Chem.,
2000, 112, 2740 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 2632).
3 G. van Koten, J. T. B. H. Jastrzebski and J. G. Noltes, J. Org.
Chem., 1977, 42, 2047.
4 B. H. Lipshutz, K. Siegmann and E. Garcia, Tetrahedron, 1992, 48,
2579.
5 J. T. B. H. Jastrzebski and G. van Koten, in Modern Organocopper
Chemistry, ed. N. Krause, Wiley-VCH GmbH, Weinheim, 2002,
ch. 1, pp. 1–44.
6 A. Camus and N. Marsich, J. Organomet. Chem., 1972, 46, 385.
7 R. P. Davies, S. Hornauer and A. J. P. White, Chem. Commun.,
2007, 304.
8 (a) M. J. McGeary, R. C. Wedlich, P. S. Coan, K. Folting and K.
G. Caulton, Polyhedron, 1992, 11, 2459; (b) M. Hakansson, C.
Lopes and S. Jagner, Organometallics, 1998, 17, 210.
9 J. M. Veauthier, E. Tomat, V. M. Lynch, J. L. Sessler, U.
Mirsaidov and J. T. Markert, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 6736.
In the presence of air and moisture, 3 decomposes within a
few hours to give a green powder. However, under argon, 3
can be stored at room temperature for several months. In
contrast to [Cu10O2(Mes)6] (I), complex 3 can be dissolved
without any significant decomposition in dry toluene, benzene
or THF. Thereby a small amount of a brown precipitate might
be formed, together with mesitylene (observed by NMR).
In conclusion, we have synthesised in high yield a novel
s-organo CuI-oxo complex that is unusually stable and bears
remarkable cuprate-like structural features, unique in this
context. Currently we are investigating the reactivity of 3 with
regard to typical cuprate applications.
¨
10 F. Jakle and I. Manners, Organometallics, 1999, 18, 2628.
11 A. L. Keen, M. Doster, H. Han and S. A. Johnson, Chem.
Commun., 2006, 1221.
¨
12 M. Hakansson, M. Ortendahl, S. Jagner, M. P. Sigalas and O.
Eisenstein, Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 2018.
¨
13 (a) F. Meyer, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2006, 3789; (b) G. Noel, J. C.
Roder, S. Dechert, H. Pritzkow, L. Bolk, S. Mecking and F.
¨
Meyer, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2006, 348, 887; (c) A. Prokofieva, A.
I. Prikhod’ko, E. A. Enyedy, E. Farkas, W. Maringgele, S.
Demeshko, S. Dechert and F. Meyer, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 4298.
¨
14 A. Sachse, L. Penkova, G. Noel, S. Dechert, O. A. Varzatskii, I. O.
Fritsky and F. Meyer, Synthesis, in press.
15 F. Meyer, K. Heinze, B. Nuber and L. Zsolnai, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans., 1998, 207.
16 (a) E. M. Meyer, S. Gambarotta, C. Floriani, A. Chiesi-Villa and
C. Guastini, Organometallics, 1989, 8, 1067; (b) H. Eriksson and
M. Hakansson, Organometallics, 1997, 16, 4243.
We thank Prof. Dr G. M. Sheldrick and Dr I. Dix for
providing X-ray data collection facilities, and the Fonds der
Chemischen Industrie for financial support.
17 (a) J. A. Bertrand, Inorg. Chem., 1967, 6, 495; (b) J. T. Guy, Jr, J.
C. Cooper, R. D. Gilardi, J. L. Flippen-Anderson and C. F.
George, Jr, Inorg. Chem., 1988, 27, 635.
Notes and references
z Characterisation data for 3: elemental analysis calcd (%) for
C86H98N12OCu8 (1824.15): C, 56.62; H, 5.42; N, 9.21; found: C,
56.41; H, 5.40; N, 9.39; m.p.: 100 1C (decomp.). 1H NMR (500.13
MHz, C6D6): d 1.71 (s, 6 H, N–CH3), 2.15 (m, 9 H, signal of
mesitylene, CH3), 2.25 (s, 6 H, p-CH3), 2.60 (s, 12 H, o-CH3), 2.97 (s
(broad), 4 H, CH2), 3.49 (s, 4 H, CH2), 6.31 (d, 3J(H,H) = 7.6 Hz,
18 (a) E. Wehman, G. van Koten, M. Knotter, H. Spelten, D.
Heijdenrijk, A. N. S. Mak and C. H. Stam, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1987, 325, 293; (b) M. D. Janssen, M. A. Corsten, A. L. Spek, D.
M. Grove and G. van Koten, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 2810.
19 A. W. Schuttelkopf and D. M. F. van Aalten, Acta Crystallogr.,
¨
Sect. D: Biol. Crytallogr., 2004, 60, 1355.
ꢂc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
1746 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 1744–1746