be the most powerful and fastest method among the reported
amine-promoted sulfonylations (entry 11).
A plausible mechanism for this observation is as follows
(Scheme 2). The NMI reagent captures TsCl to form a highly
Scheme 1. Tosylations of Alcohols and ꢀ-Ketoesters Using a
TsCl-N-Methylimidazole (NMI)-Et3N or LiOH System
Scheme 2
.
Plausible Mechanism for NMI-Promoted
Sulfonylation of Alcohol
(Table 1). The combination of NMI and Et3N exhibited a
remarkable synergistic effect (entries 1-4).8 In contrast, the
Table 1. Powerful Sulfonylation of Alcohols
reactive N-sulfonylammonium intermediate, which in turn
condenses with an alcohol to produce a tosylate assisted by
Et3N, while releasing Et3N·HCl. Careful 1H NMR (300 MHz)
monitoring of a mixture of TsCl and NMI in CD3CN
rationally supported the present hypothesis; the generation
of a N-sulfonylammonium intermediate was unambiguously
detected.9 The apparent downfield chemical shift of NMI
moieties in the intermediate is related to the higher sulfo-
nylation reactivity of the present system in accordance with
a relevant discussion.8a This successful result prompted us
to investigate stereoselective enol tosylation of ꢀ-ketoesters.
(E)- or (Z)-Stereofixed enol sulfonates are recognized as
useful cross-coupling partners. Enol triflates are generally
used for this purpose,10 but they have two drawbacks
particularly for process chemistry: instability and high cost.
Despite its high demand, there have been few investigation
of enol tosylation. Recently, the Merck process group
disclosed a notable stereocomplementary tosylation method
for a sole specific γ-amino-ꢀ-ketoester using Ts2O and Et3N
or LDA.11 They rationally point out the advantage over enol
triflates with regard to stability and benchtop handling
procedures, etc. Expensive reagents (Ts2O and LDA) and
low temperature (-50 °C) for 3 h were, however, required.12
Our initial investigation was guided by the tosylation of
methyl acetoacetate using TsCl-NMI-Et3N or other bases
(Table 2). The use of Et3N successfully promoted the (E)-
selective tosylation (entry 1), which is consistent with the
reported reaction using Ts2O and Et3N.11
a Chlorobenzene(C6H5Cl)wasusedinsteadoftoluene.b Et3N-Me3N·HCl2a
was used instead of NMI-Et3N.
use of DMAP, a super acylation catalyst, instead of Et3N
resulted in no reaction (entry 5). Stereocongested secondary
alcohols, such as l-menthol, methyl mandelate, and 3,3-
dimethyl-2-butanol, underwent the present reaction to give
the desired tosylates (entries 7, 9, 11). Relevant mesylations
also proceeded more smoothly (entries 8, 10, 12). This might
t
Lithium reagents (nBuLi, LDA, LiHMDS, BuOLi) pro-
moted the (Z)-selective tosylation (entries 3-5, 8), whereas
the use of KHMDS and NaHMDS decreased the selectivity
(entries 6 and 7). More practical and robust LiOH exhibited
(7) (a) Misaki, T.; Nagase, R.; Matsumoto, K.; Tanabe, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 2854. (b) Iida, A.; Nakazawa, S.; Okabayashi, T.; Horii,
A.; Misaki, T.; Tanabe, Y. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5215. (c) Iida, A.; Nakazawa,
S.; Nakatsuji, H.; Misaki, T.; Tanabe, Y. Chem. Lett. 2007, 36, 48. We
have been pointing out that NMI is superior to DMAP for acylation reactions
with regard to reactivity, cost, and toxicity [NMI (rat LD50, oral, 1130 mg/
kg) and DMAP (56 mg/kg)]
(8) This observation resembles the precedent reports of esterification
and amide formations promoted by combined bases NMI and TMEDA. (a)
Nakatsuji, H.; Morita, J.; Misaki, T.; Tanabe, Y AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006,
348, 2057. (b) Nakatsuji, H.; Morimoto, M.; Misaki, T.; Tanabe, Y.
Tetrahedron 2007, 50, 12071.
(9) NMI [δ 3.63 (s, 3H), 6.89 (s, 1H), 6.95 (s, 1H), 7.38 (s, 1H)] and A
[δ 2.39 (s, 3H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 7.46-7.48(m, 2H), 7.70. (s, 1H), 8.02 (s,
1H), 8.12-8.15 (m, 2H), 11.05 (s, 1H)]. A chart was described in ESI.
(10) For a recent example Hansen, A. L.; Skrydstrup, T. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 5997.
(11) Baxter, J. M.; Steinhuebel, D.; Palucki, M.; Davies, I. W. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 215.
(12) Klapars, A.; Campos, K. R.; Chen, C-y.; Volante, R. P. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 1185. TsCl is ca. 1/10 more inexpensive than Ts2O. It was
commented that the use of TsCl caused R-chlorination as a side reaction.
2132
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008