C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
related compounds to construct self-assembled nanostructures in
aqueous media for biomedical applications.2
Acknowledgment. We thank Prof. Gian Piero Spada (Universita´
di Bologna) and Prof. Beatriz Zayas (UMET, PR) for assistance
with CD and MS studies, respectively. We also thank Ivonne
Andu´jar and Jose´ E. Betancourt for their helpful technical assistance.
G.H. thanks NIH-SCoRE (2506GM08102), and M.G-A. thanks
NIH-RISE (2R25GM61151), NSF-EPSCoR (EPS0223152), PRL-
SAMP-HRD-0114586, and SLOAN for graduate fellowships.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental protocols
and spectroscopic data. This material is available free of charge via
Figure 3. Comparison of the relative sizes for the hexadecamers of
mAGcat (blue, r′H) and mAGi (red, r′′H) highlighting the hydrodynamic
radii. Only the top tetrads are highlighted for clarity. The purple sphere
represents a potassium cation.14
References
(1) Ball, P. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 74–108.
near 290 nm (Figure S14). Despite their different environments,
the close correlation of their CD spectra is a strong indication they
share a similar structure at the core.12
(2) For examples of self-assembled nanostructures used for biomedical
applications, see: (a) Dankers, P. Y. W.; Meijer, E. W. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 2007, 80, 2047–2073. (b) Jun, H.; Paramonov, S. E.; Hartgerink, J. D.
Soft Matter 2006, 177–181.
(3) Oshovsky, G. V.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Verboom, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 2366–2393.
The hexadecamers of both mAGcat and mAGi display parallel
signature cross-peak patterns in their 2D NOESY spectra in
H2O-D2O (9:1) and CD3CN, respectively (Figure 2). These
experiments offer further evidence to support that mAGcat and
mAGi form supramolecules of the same molecularity (hexa-
decamers). Furthermore, parallel to the CD results, the NOESY
spectra indicate that the stereochemical arrangement of the mAG
moieties within the core of the quadruplex is nearly identical (i.e.,
isostructural).
(4) (a) Fenniri, H.; Deng, B.-L.; Ribbe, A. E.; Hallenga, K.; Jacob, J.;
Thiyagarajan, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 6487–6492. (b)
Fenniri, H.; Mathivanan, P.; Vidale, K. L.; Sherman, D. M.; Hallenga, K.;
Wood, K. V.; Stowell, J. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3854–3855. (c)
Hartgerink, J. D.; Beniash, E.; Stupp, S. I. Science 2001, 294, 1684–1688.
(d) Hartgerink, J. D.; Beniash, E.; Stupp, S. I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2002, 99, 5133–5138. (e) Ryu, J. H.; Hong, D. J.; Lee, M. Chem. Commun.
2008, 1043–1054. (f) Kato, T.; Mizoshita, N.; Kishimoto, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 38–68.
(5) For representative examples of capsular assemblies made with coordinative
covalent bonds, see: (a) Fujita, M.; Tominaga, M.; Hori, A.; Therrien, B.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 369–378. (b) Fiedler, D.; Leung, D. H.; Bergman,
R. G.; Raymond, K. N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 349–358. For an example
of a hydrophobically driven self-assembled capsule, see: (c) Gibb, C. L. D.;
Gibb, B. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11408–11409.
(6) Rzepecki, P.; Hochdorffer, K.; Schaller, T.; Zienau, J.; Harms, K.;
Ochsenfeld, C.; Xie, X.; Schrader, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 586–
591.
(7) (a) Gubala, V.; Betancourt, J. E.; Rivera, J. M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4735–
4738. (b) Betancourt, J. E.; Rivera, J. M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2287–2290.
(c) Hobley, G.; Gubala, V.; Rivera-Sa´nchez, M. C.; Rivera, J. M. Synlett
2008, 1510–1514.
(8) (a) Davis, J. T.; Spada, G. P. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 296–313. (b) Davis,
J. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 668–698.
(9) Rehm, T.; Schmuck, C. Chem. Commun. 2008, 801–813.
(10) Although the studies reported here were performed using 1 M KCl, titration
experiments of mAGcat with KCl show the presence of 31% hexadecamer
even with 0.6 mM KCl (Figure S17).
(11) Studies with 5′-GMP have also shown that it self-assembles with low fidelity
in aqueous KCl solutions but only at very high concentrations (0.15-1.0
M), giving a mixture of columnar aggregates of indefinite length (stacks
of <24-87 tetrads): (a) Fisk, C. L.; Becker, E. D.; Miles, H. T.; Pinnavaia,
T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 3307–3314. (b) Bouhoutsos-Brown,
E.; Marshall, C. L.; Pinnavaia, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6576–
6584. (c) Wong, A.; Ida, R.; Spindler, L.; Wu, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 6990–6998.
(12) From the CD results, it can be inferred that the helical twist between the
planar tetrads is very similar for the hexadecamers of mAGcat and mAGi
due to the relative stereochemical arrangements of the subunits. For further
information, see: Paramasivan, S.; Rujan, I.; Bolton, P. H. Methods 2007,
43, 324–331.
(13) (a) Cohen, Y.; Avram, L.; Frish, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 520–
554. (b) Kaucher, M. S.; Lam, Y. F.; Pieraccini, S.; Gottarelli, G.; Davis,
J. T. Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 11, 164–173.
(14) Minimizations were performed using: AMBER* (MacroModel), Version
9.5, Maestro 8.0.315; Schro¨dinger, LLC: New York, 2007, representing
water as a continuum solvent.
(15) These thermodynamic parameters are similar to those determined from the
calorimetric measurements obtained for DNA aptamers capable of forming
G-quadruplexes. See: (a) Olsen, C. M.; Gmeiner, W. H.; Marky, L. A. J.
Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 6962–6969. (b) Mergny, J. L.; De Cian, A.;
Ghelab, A.; Sacca`, B.; Lacroix, L. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 81–94. (c)
Rachwal, P. A.; Fox, K. R. Methods 2007, 43, 291–301.
(16) (a) Grimme, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3430–3434. (b) Guckian,
K. M.; Schweitzer, B. A.; Ren, R. X. F.; Sheils, C. J.; Tahmassebi, D. C.;
Kool, E. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2213–2222. (c) Krueger, A. T.;
Lu, H.; Lee, A. H.; Kool, E. T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 141–150.
(17) Prins, L. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Timmerman, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 2382–2426.
In order to get a sense of the size of the (mAGcat)16•3KCl, we
performed 1H DOSY NMR experiments to determine its molecular
translational coefficient (D). We found that D ) (0.776 ( 0.020)
× 10-10 m2 s-1 at 298 K, which corresponds to a hydrodynamic
radius (r′H) of 25.5 Å.13 This value is in close agreement with 24.8
Å, which was obtained from a molecular model of the mAGcat
hexadecamer (Figures S25 and S26).14 In contrast, (mAGi)16•3KI
has a D ) (6.430 ( 0.114) × 10-10 m2 s-1 at 298 K in CD3CN,
which corresponds to a smaller r′′H of 10.0 Å. The differences in
sizes are due to the shorter isopropyl side chains in mAGi and the
fact that the side chains in mAGcat are more extended due to the
repulsion between the cationic ammonium groups (Figure 3).
Analysis of the melting curve of mAGcat, obtained by variable
temperature (VT) NMR, reveals a Tm of 60.7 °C, which is once
again remarkably close to the value obtained for mAGi in CD3CN
of 56.4 °C (Figure S27).7 A detailed thermodynamic profile using
differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) shows a monophasic
transition at 55.1 °C with a favorable ∆G (293 K) value, -2.1 kcal/
mol (∆H ) -33.7 kcal/mol, T∆S -31.6 kcal/mol) for the formation
of the quadruplex and results from the compensation of a favorable
enthalpy with an unfavorable entropy contribution (assembly of
16 subunits and 3 cations).15 Compared to dGcat, mAGcat has a
larger surface area and greater hydrophobicity, both of which have
been shown to stabilize supramolecular structures in water due to
enhanced van der Waals and π-stacking.16 The mAGcat tetrads
can also form up to four additional H bonds due to the expanded
Hoogsteen edge (Figure 1a).7,17
In conclusion, the mAG moiety represents a remarkable example
of a small-molecule recognition motif that is capable of assembling
isostructurally in organic or aqueous media with high fidelity and
stability. We expect that this and related derivatives will offer
important insights into the rules that govern the self-assembly of
small molecules in aqueous media. We are currently using this and
JA8039019
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 32, 2008 10493