Ora et al.
gates.5 The cytotoxic drugs, methotrexate, melphalan, doxoru-
bicin, or cis-platinin, were directly covalently attached to the
terminal amino group of bisphosphonate, pamidronate (1b).
However, the anticancer properties of these conjugates tested
in certain animal models proved to be encouraging but far from
perfect and, in the case of doxorubicin, even negative.5b
Unfortunately, no data were presented on the stability of these
conjugates and the kinetics of accumulation in the bone. Thus,
it is possible that the covalent bond between the components
of the conjugates was either too stable or too unstable in vivo
to provide the desired concentrations of a cytotoxic compound
in bone. Most likely, intact, negatively charged conjugates with
a stable covalent bond would not be able to interact effectively
with intracellular molecular targets. On the other hand, an
unstable bond would cleave in the blood stream and could not
provide a sufficient increase of the active compound at bone
tissues. Recently it has been suggested that bisphosphonates
covalently linked via a phosphate group to cytotoxic agents,
such as structurally modified nucleosides provide an optimal
stability. This linkage allows the intact conjugate to survive in
the circulation, bind the mineral matrix of bone, and subse-
quently release both drugs in the bone microenvironment.6
Compounds designed in such a way will localize at the site of
tumor cell induced bone destruction and combine antiresorptive
and antitumor activities. These conjugates may become promis-
ing drugs that would increase the local concentration of the
cytotoxic agent, greatly improving efficacy without increasing
systemic toxicity of chemotherapeutic.
To learn more about the physicochemical properties and
serum stability of nucleoside bisphosphonate conjugates, a
quantitative kinetic investigation of the hydrolytic reactions of
nucleoside 5′-ꢀ,γ-methylene and 5′-ꢀ,γ-(1-hydroxyethylidene)
triphosphates has been carried out over a wide pH range at
elevate temperature and under physiological conditions in the
presence and absence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions. In addition, the
hydrolytic stability in human and mouse serum and the affinity
toward hydroxyapatite have been investigated. The compounds
studied include two conjugates of etidronate (2), viz. 5′-ꢀ,γ-
(1-hydroxyethylidene) triphosphates of 5-fluorouridine (4) and
ara-cytidine (6), and two conjugates of medronate (3), viz. 5′-
CHART 1
ꢀ,γ-methylene triphosphates of 5-fluorouridine (5) and ara-
cytidine (7) (Chart1).
Results
Product Distribution of the Hydrolysis of 4-7. First-order
rate constants for the hydrolysis of the bisphosphonate analogues
of 5-fluorouridine and ara-cytidine 5′-triphosphates (4-7) were
determined over a wide pH range (from pH 1.0 to 8.5, I ) 1.0
mol L-1 with NaCl) at 90 °C by analyzing the compositions of
the aliquots withdrawn at appropriate time intervals from the
reaction mixture by RP HPLC. Each reaction mixture contained
EDTA (2 mmol L-1) to suppress possible metal ion catalysis.
The products were characterized either by spiking with authentic
samples or by mass spectrometric analysis (HPLC/ESI-MS).
Over the pH range studied, disappearance of the starting material
was accompanied by formation of the corresponding nucleoside
5′-monophosphate, viz. 5-fluorouridine 5′-monophosphate (8)
from 4 and 5 and ara-cytidine 5′-monophosphate (9) from 6
and 7 (Scheme 1). With the ꢀ,γ-(1-hydroxyethylidene) ana-
logues (4, 6), the starting material was entirely converted to
the corresponding monophosphate (4 to 8 and 6 to 9) before
any other products appeared. For example, the first-order rate
constant for the hydrolysis of 6 to 9 was (1.14 ( 0.07) × 10-2
s-1 at pH 7.5, while the first-order rate constant for the
disappearance of 9 was (3.4 ( 0.2) × 10-7 s-1. The latter
reaction proceeded by two parallel routes, viz. dephosphorylation
to ara-cytidine (10, 15%) and deamination to ara-uridine 5′-
monophosphate (11, 85%). The methylene analogues (5 and 7)
did not, in turn, demonstrate quantitative accumulation of
monophosphate prior to the formation of secondary products.
Dephosphorylation to nucleoside, either 5-fluorouridine (12) or
ara-cytidine (10), was clearly visible at the late stage of the
hydrolysis, but the maximum time-dependent concentration of
the monophosphate still was more than 90%. The situation was
more complicated only under mildly acidic conditions (pH 3-6)
and only with 7. In addition to ara-cytidine 5′-monophosphate
(9), two other products accumulated, as shown by the time-
dependent product distribution in Figure 1. In parallel to
formation of 5′-monophosphate 9, the starting material was
deaminated to ara-uridine 5′-ꢀ,γ-methylenetriphosphate (13),
as indicated by the m/z [M - H]- 481.2 and the UV absorption
(1) (a) Coleman, R. E. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 6243s–6249s. (b) Body,
J.-J. SupportiVe Care Cancer 2006, 14, 408–418. (c) Lipton, A.; Berenson, J. R.;
Body, J. J.; Boyce, B. F.; Bruland, O. S.; Carducci, M. A.; Cleeland, C. S.;
Clohisy, D. R.; Coleman, R. E.; Cook, R. J.; Guise, T. A.; Pearse, R. N.; Powles,
T. J.; Rogers, M. J.; Roodman, G. D.; Smith, M. R.; Suva, L. J.; Vessella, R. L.;
Weilbaecher, K. N.; King, L. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 6209s–6212s.
(2) (a) Body, J. J.; Diel, I.; Bell, R. Semin. Oncol. 2004, 31, 73–78. (b)
Cameron, D. Semin. Oncol. 2004, 31, 79–82. (c) Picket, F. A. J. Dent. Hyg.
2006, 80, 10. (d) Sanna, G.; Preda, L.; Bruschini, R.; Rocca, M. C.; Ferretti, S.;
Adamoli, L.; Verri, E.; Franceschelli, L.; Goldhirsch, A.; Nole, F. Ann. Oncol.
2006, 17, 1512–16.
(3) (a) Daubine, F.; Le Gall, C.; Gasser, J.; Green, J.; Clezardin, P. J. Natl.
Cancer Inst. 2007, 99, 322–330. (b) Clezardin, P.; Ebetino, F. H.; Fournier,
P. G. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 4971–4974. (c) Green, J. R. Oncologist 2004, 9,
3–13. (Suppl. 4)
(4) For reviews see: (a) Uludag, H. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2002, 8, 1929–1944.
(b) Hirabayashi, H.; Fujisaki, J. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2003, 42, 1319–30.
(5) (a) Hosain, F.; Spencer, R. P.; Couthon, H. M.; Sturtz, G. L. J. Nucl.
Med. 1996, 37, 105–107. (b) Sturtz, G. A.; Appere, G. A.; Breistol, K. A.;
Fodstad, O. A.; Schwartsmann, G.; Hendriks, H. R. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1992,
27, 825–833. (c) Sturtz, G. L.; Couthon, H. M.; Fabulet, O.; Mian, M. A.; Rosini,
S. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 28, 899–903. (d) Fabulet, O.; Sturtz, G. A.
Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 1995, 101, 225–234.
(6) (a) Karpeisky, M. Y.; Padyukova, N. S.; Mikhailov, S. N.; Dixon, H. B. F.;
Tzeitline, G. US patent 6,214,812 B1. (MBC Research, Inc., Boulder, CO, 2001).
(b) Karpeisky, M. Y.; Padyukova, N. S.; Mikhailov, S. N.; Dixon, H. B. F.;
Tzeitline, G. US patent 6,750,340 B2(MBC Research, Inc., Boulder, CO, 2004).
(c) Reinholz, G. G.; Getz, B.; Sanders, E. S.; Karpeisky, M. Y.; Padyukova,
N. S.; Mikhailov, S. N.; Ingle, J. N.; Spelsberg, T. C. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.
2002, 71, 257–268.
4124 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 11, 2008