Nimitsiriwat et al.
Scheme 1
Scheme 2. Syntheses of Potentially Tridentate Salicylaldimines
ization of lactide, most notably with Zn,7 Mg,7c and Ca.8 A
clear message to arise from these studies is the difficulty in
obtaining single-site behavior if the salicylaldiminate binds
merely as a bidentate chelate. For example, Chisholm and
co-workers have successfully employed bidentate phenoxy-
imines to support three-coordinate zinc-based initiators, but
single-site behavior requires both the Schiff base and the
initiating nucleophile (either an aryloxide or amide) to be
bulky (e.g., I, Scheme 1): slow consumption of L-LA ensues,
with 20 equiv polymerized over 3 h at 25 °C.7a Lin et al.
have shown that dimeric complexes of tridentate variants
are more readily accessible, and less bulky counterparts of
II (lacking the phenoxy tert-butyl substituents) afford much
more active initiators than I, capable of consuming 200 equiv
of LA in <30 min at room temperature.7b
In light of these results, we chose to investigate the tin(II)
complexation chemistry of potentially tridentate salicylaldi-
mines, with a view to producing single-site LA polymeri-
zation initiators. We were particularly interested to discover
whether the presence of a third donor site might help
overcome the influence of the 5s2 electrons, leading to
different PLA tacticities. As described below, this study
instead led to the discovery of a rather unusual ligand
amination reaction, aspects of which have been com-
municated.9
halogenated substituents on the phenoxy ring have also been
examined within the O-donor family.
Single-site initiators for the ring-opening polymerization
of cyclic esters are typically alkoxide (-OR) complexes,
although other nucleophilic ligands such as amides (-NR2)
may also be used.11 In order to prepare [RONL]Sn(OR)
alkoxide complexes, a two-step route successfully used to
synthesize ꢀ-diketiminate tin(II) analogues2 was initially
envisaged, that is, formation of [RONL]SnCl and subsequent
metathesis with an alkali metal alkoxide. Thus, lithiation of
Synthetic Studies
[
tBuONNMe ]H, [tBuONPPh ]H, [tBuONOMe]H, and [tBuONSPh]H
2
2
n
with BuLi, followed by addition to a suspension of SnCl2
in toluene at room temperature, afforded the salicylaldiminate
tin(II) chloride complexes 1-4 in recrystallized yields of
74, 76, 49, and 64%, respectively (Scheme 3).10
Salicylaldimines with a neutral donor atom bound to the
imine functionality are readily obtained from the condensa-
tion of a 2,4-disubstituted salicylaldehyde with an ap-
propriately functionalized amine or aniline (Scheme 2);10 for
the sake of brevity, these are abbreviated to [RONR′]H, where
R represents the ortho- and para-phenol substituents, and
R′ indicates the N-substituent. These were chosen to allow
a probe of both steric and electronic factors, particularly with
respect to the imino donor arm, which features a range of
N-, P-, O-, and S-based donor groups. The effects of
However, all reactions of the chloride complexes with
LiOiPr and NaOtBu led to intractable mixtures, with the
exception of the reaction of 4 with NaOtBu, for which
recrystallization of the crude product mixture resulted in the
isolation of the bischelate [tBuONSPh]2Sn, 5. This synthetic
route was therefore abandoned in favor of direct metalation
with Sn(NMe2)2.12 Due to high solubilities, the products
(6) (a) Cameron, P. A.; Gibson, V. C.; Redshaw, C.; Segal, J. A.; Bruce,
M. D.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1883–
1884. (b) Cameron, P. A.; Gibson, V. C.; Redshaw, C.; Segal, J. A.;
White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Dalton. Trans. 2002, 415–422. (c)
Annunziata, L.; Pappalardo, D.; Tedesco, C.; Pellecchia, C. Organo-
metallics 2005, 24, 1947–1952.
arising from the reactions with [tBuONNMe ]H, [tBuONOPh]H,
2
and [tBuONSMe]H could not be readily purified by either
washing or recrystallization. Nonetheless, complexes 6–11,
formed from the treatment of Sn(NMe2)2 with [tBuONquin]H,
(7) (a) Chisholm, M. H.; Gallucci, J.; Zhen, H.; Huffman, J. C. Inorg.
Chem. 2001, 40, 5051–5054. (b) Chen, H.-Y.; Tang, H.-Y.; Lin, C.-
C. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 3745–3752. (c) Wu, J.-C.; Huang, B.-
H.; Hsueh, M.-L.; Lai, S.-L.; Lin, C-C. Polymer 2005, 46, 9784–9792.
(8) Darensbourg, D. J.; Choi, W.; Richers, C. P. Macromolecules 2007,
40, 3521–3523.
(11) (a) O’Keefe, B. J.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Tolman, W. B. Dalton Trans.
2001, 2215–2224. (b) Gibson, V. C.; Marshall, E. L. In ComprehensiVe
Coordination Chemistry II; McCleverty, J. A., Meyer, T. J., Eds.;
Elsevier: Oxford, 2003; Vol. 9, pp 1–74; (c) Nakano, K.; Kosaka, N.;
Hiyama, T.; Nozaki, K. Dalton Trans. 2003, 4039–4050. (d) Dechy-
Cabaret, O.; Martin-Vaca, B.; Bourissou, D. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104,
6147–6176.
(9) Nimitsiriwat, N.; Marshall, E. L.; Gibson, V. C.; Elsegood, M. R. J.;
Dale, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13598–13599.
(10) See Supporting Information.
(12) Foley, P.; Zeldin, M. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14, 2264–2267.
5418 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 12, 2008