BF3•OEt2
+
278 °C. Warming to room temp. gave a white suspension, which afforded
–
Ph
C
C
Li
Ph
C
C
1a
BF3Li
a colourless solution on gentle heating. Storage at +5 °C for three days
afforded a colourless co-crystalline mixture of 2 and 3. Yield (based on 11
B
BF3•OEt2 –LiF
NMR spectroscopy and Scheme 2), 61% (2) and 16% (3), mp 163–164 °C.
1H NMR [250 MHz, 25 °C, (CD3)2SO], d 7.45–7.35 (m, 15 H, Ph), 3.59 (m,
4 H, thf), 1.76 (m, 4 H, thf). 13C NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, Me2SO), d 131.1,
128.5 (o-,m-Ph), 127.5 (p-Ph), 124.7 (ipso-C-Ph), 95.3 (·C–Ph), 67.1, 25.2
+
BF2
Ph
C
C
LiBF4
3
1b
(thf). 19F NMR (235.361 MHz, 25 °C, Me2SO, CCl3F d = 0), d 2147.59
2Ph
C C Li/2BF3•OEt2 –2LiF
(q, 11BF4
,
1J11 1.1 Hz), 2147.53 (br m, 10BF42). 7Li NMR (155.508
2
BF
MHz, 25 °C, Me2SO, PhLi d = 0), d 20.11 [s, Li(Me2SO)4+]. 11B NMR
(128.379 MHz, 25 °C, Me2SO BF3·OEt2 d = 0), d 20.75 (qnt., BF42, 1JBF
1.1 Hz); (C6D6, BF3·OEt2 d = 0), d ca. 0.03 (br s, Dn1/2 450 Hz); ([2H8]thf,
BF3·OEt2 d = 0), d 21.18 (qut., 1B, 1JBF 1.8 Hz), ca. 27.32 (br s, 1.25B,
Dn1/2 = 340 Hz).
(Ph
C C)3B•thf
+
2LiBF4
3
2
Scheme 2
‡
Crystal data for 2: C28H23BO, monoclinic, space group P21/n,
trifluoride molecule, generating 3. Furthermore, it appears that
1b is attacked by 2 further equiv. of lithium phenylacetylide,
eliminating LiF each time and ultimately giving 2 (Scheme 2).
It is also apparent that an explanation of the favourability of
utilising 2 or 3 equiv. of the supposed acetylidoborate/borane
intermediate (1a,b) in subsequent nucleophilic addition chem-
istry is then at hand. Thus, the true alkynyl anion intermediate,
2, contains not one, but three phenylacetylido-ligands. The
implication is that one phenylacetylido-ligand is relatively
active with respect to subsequent nucleophilic behaviour while
the other two are largely inactive. This can be rationalised in
terms of the sterically congested intermediate species resulting
from the addition of 2 across just one carbonyl,5 imine6 or
N-aziridinylimine (Scheme 3).7
a = 10.188(4), b = 15.159(3), c = 14.5899(11) Å, b = 104.385(9)°,
U = 2182.6(9) Å3, Mr = 386.27, Z = 4, Dc = 1.176 Mg m23, m(Mo-
Ka) = 0.069 mm21, F(000) = 816. Data were collected by the w–2q scan
method on a Rigaku AKC5R four-circle diffractometer at 153(2) K using
graphite-monochromated Mo-KKa radiation (l = 0.71069 Å) in the range
5.16 < 2q < 45.00°, +h, +k, ±l; 3045 reflections of which 2857 were
independent (Rint = 0.0222) and used in all calculations. The structure was
solved using direct methods9 and subsequent Fourier difference syntheses
and refined10 by full-matrix least squares on F2 with anisotropic thermal
parameters for all non-hydrogen atoms. Hydrogen atoms were placed in
geometrically idealised positions and refined using a riding model. In the
final cycles of refinement a weighting scheme of the form w21 = [s2(Fo
)
2
+ (0.0745P)2 + 1.58P], where P = (Fo + 2Fc2)/3, was employed which
2
produced a flat analysis of variance. Final R(F)
= 0.0452 for 2084
reflections with [I > 2s(I)], wR(F2) = 0.2247 for all data; 271 parameters;
goodness of fit = 1.039. Maximum peak and hole in final Fourier difference
map 0.238 and 20.197 e Å23 respectively. CCDC 182/562.
O
1 R. A. Volkmann, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. M. Trost
and I. Fleming, Pergamon, New York, 1991, vol. 1, ch. 1.12.
2 R. W. Layer, Chem. Rev., 1963, 63, 489; R. A. Volkmann, J. T. Davis
and C. N. Meltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 5946.
3 A. I. Meyers, D. R. Williams and M. Druelinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1976, 98, 3032.
(Ph
C C)3B•thf
2
X
B
PhCC
PhCC
X
R1
R2
X = NR3, O
R1
R2
C
C
4 M. Wada, Y. Sakurai and K. Akiba, Tetrahedron Lett., 1984, 25,
1079.
Ph
5 M. Yamaguchi, T. Waseda and I. Hirao, Chem. Lett., 1983, 35.
6 M. Wada, Y. Sakurai and K. Akiba, Tetrahedron Lett., 1984, 25,
1083.
7 S. Kim, C. M. Cho and J.-Y. Yoon, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 6018.
8 B. Schubert and E. Weiss, Angew. Chem., 1983, 95, 499; Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1983, 22, 496; B. Schubert and E. Weiss, Chem. Ber.,
1983, 116, 3212.
9 G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C, 1990, A46, 467.
10 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-93, Program for Crystal Structure Refine-
ment, University of Go¨ttingen, 1993.
Scheme 3
In conclusion, formation of 2, the first example of a
structurally characterised tris(acetylidoborane), is probably via
the sequential elimination of LiF from acetylidoborate pre-
cursors (e.g. 1a). Addition of the eliminated LiF to unreacted
boron trifluoride means that formation of 2 is concomitant with
that of LiBF4, 3, as evidenced by multinuclear NMR spectros-
copy. Finally, the fact that 2 is the true intermediate in RC·CLi/
BF3-promoted alkynyl anion chemistry, rather than 1a or 1b,
helps to explain the stoichiometries required for efficient
subsequent nucleophilic addition reactions.
11 A. Meller, W. Maringgele, G. Elter, D. Bromm, M. Noltemeyer and
G. M. Sheldrick, Chem. Ber., 1987, 120, 1437; W. Maringgele,
H. Knop, D. Bromm, A. Meller, S. Dielkus, R. Herbst-Irmer and
G. M. Sheldrick Chem. Ber., 1992, 125, 1807; H. Schulz, G. Gabbert,
H. Pritzkow and W. Siebert, Chem. Ber., 1993, 126, 1593.
12 Hydrogen-bonding interactions are generally regarded as having C···O
interactive distances of 3.0–4.0 Å. Analysis of 868 R3CH···O systems
gives a mean of 3.59 Å; R. Taylor and O. Kennard, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1982, 104, 5063.
We thank the UK EPSRC (A. E. H. W) and The Royal
Society (J. E. D., P. R. R.) for financial support.
Footnotes and References
* E-mail: cmc1006@cam.ac.uk
†
BunLi (1.88 ml, 1.6
m in hexanes, 3.0 mmol) was added to
phenylacetylene (0.33 ml, 3.0 mmol) in thf–toluene (5:1 ml) at 278 °C
under nitrogen. After stirring for 10 min, BF3·OEt2 (0.37 ml, 3.0 mmol) was
added and the resultant yellow solution was stirred for a further 10 min at
13 For NBun4BF4 in CH2Cl2, 1J11BF 1.0 Hz at 280 °C; J. S. Hartmann and
G. J. Schrobilgen, Inorg. Chem., 1972, 11, 940.
Received in Cambridge, UK, 16th June 1997; 7/04185C
1798
Chem. Commun., 1997