Synthesis of Bisquinolone-Based Mono- and
Diphosphine Ligands of the Aza-BINAP Type
Nuzhat Arshad, Jamshed Hashim, and C. Oliver Kappe*
Christian Doppler Laboratory for MicrowaVe Chemistry
(CDLMC) and Institute of Chemistry, Karl-Franzens
UniVersity Graz, Heinrichstrasse 28, A-8010 Graz, Austria
ReceiVed March 25, 2008
FIGURE 1. Bis- and monophosphine bi(hetero)aryl ligands.
separation from the reaction mixture or to modify other ligand
properties.1,3
Of more recent interest among these ligands are bisphosphines
based on biheteroaryl backbones.1,4,5 The main advantage of
these systems is the possibility to synthesize ligands with a
variety of electronic properties, as the electronic properties of
the heteroaryl rings impact directly on the electronic properties
of the phosphine ligators. In addition, a much wider variety of
potential frameworks offering more flexible synthetic routes are
available as compared to standard biaryl ligands. It has been
demonstrated, for example, that the biheteroaryl ligands BI-
TIANP (2)4 and BINAPFu (3)5 sometimes display higher
catalytic activities and enantioselectivities as compared to
BINAP in asymmetric hydrogenations and/or Heck reactions.
In addition to bisphosphines, monodentate chiral phosphine
ligands (for example MeO-MOP 4) and biaryl-based mono-
phosphines in general (for example, XPhos 5) are becoming
increasingly important as ligands for those transition-metal-
catalyzed reactions where bisphosphine-metal complexes can-
not be used because of their low selectivity toward a desired
reaction pathway.6
Inspired by the success of biheteroaryl phosphine ligands
in asymmetric catalysis,1,4,5 we became interested in the
design and generation of both mono- and bisphosphine
ligands based on the recently disclosed 4,4′-bisquinolone
framework (Figure 2).7
The putative bisquinolone phosphine ligands of the BIQUIP
type would offer several potential advantages compared to their
binaphthyl counterparts (BINAP) as the electronic properties
of the cyclic enamide system in the quinolone moiety are
expected to exert a unique impact on the electronic properties
of the phosphine ligators. In addition, the presence and proximity
of soft (phosphine) and hard (carbonyl) donor groups in the
ligand molecule provides the potential of hemilabile coordinating
abilities in this type of hybrid ligand (Figure 2).8 The 2(1H)-
quinolone system itself offers several readily available diver-
Mono- and bisphosphine ligands based on the 4,4′-bisqui-
nolone structural framework (BIQUIP ligands) were gener-
ated by direct microwave-assisted palladium-catalyzed
carbon-phosphorus cross-coupling reactions employing the
corresponding heteroaryl bromides and diphenylphosphine
as substrates.
Ligand design for asymmetric catalysis has been and con-
tinues to be an important area of synthetic organic chemistry.
Novel classes of ligands that offer additional synthetic op-
portunities or provide new insights into fundamental chemical
processes are constantly being pursued. In this context, atropi-
someric, C2-symmetric phosphines have played a crucial role
in the development of asymmetric catalysis and are among the
most effective ligand systems known today.1–5 The most
successful ligand in this class is the well-known binaphthyl
bisphosphine-based BINAP ligand (Figure 1, 1). BINAP induces
very high ee’s in several asymmetric transition-metal-catalyzed
processes, including hydrogenations, hydrosilylations, hydro-
cyanations, Heck reactions, and enamine isomerizations.2 Until
now, more than 60 frameworks based on the biaryl bisphosphine
theme have been developed in order to effectively tune
efficiency (turnover) and selectivity (ee) but also to facilitate
(1) (a) Shimizu, H.; Nagasaki, I.; Saito, T. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 5405. (b)
ˇ
Kocˇovsky, P.; Vyskocil, S.; Smrcina, M. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3213.
(2) (a) Noyori, R.; Takaya, H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 345. (b) Noyori,
R. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 15.
(3) (a) Berthold, M.; Mignani, G.; Woodward, G.; Lemaire, M. Chem. ReV.
2005, 105, 1801. (b) Tanaka, K. Synlett 2007, 1977.
(4) (a) Benincori, T.; Brenna, E.; Sannicolo´, F.; Trimarco, L.; Antognazza,
P.; Cesarotti, E.; Demartin, F.; Pilati, T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6244. (b)
Benincori, T.; Brenna, E.; Sannicolo´, F.; Trimarco, L.; Antognazza, P.; Cesarotti,
E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 685. (c) Spino, C.; Mayes, N.; Desfosse´s,
H.; Sotheeswaran, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6503.
(6) (a) Hayashi, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 354. (b) Gibson, S. E.; Rudd,
M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 781.
(7) (a) Hashim, J.; Glasnov, T. N.; Kremsner, J. M.; Kappe, C. O. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 1707. (b) Hashim, J.; Kappe, C. O. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007,
349, 2353.
(5) (a) Andersen, N. G.; Parvez, M.; Keay, B. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2817.
(b) Andersen, N. G.; Parvez, M.; McDonald, R.; Keay, B. A. Can. J. Chem.
2004, 82, 145.
(8) Braunstein, P.; Naud, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 680.
10.1021/jo800665t CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 05/29/2008
2008 American Chemical Society
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4755–4758 4755