T. C. Jessop et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 6784–6787
6785
Table 1
by aromatic residues above and below the cytosine ring. Generally,
the enzymatic specificity of dCK allows for a wide range of nucleo-
sides to act as substrates.7 Compound 1 was found to be a compet-
itive inhibitor of dCK with an IC50 of 120 nM.
In designing new inhibitors of dCK, we sought to prepare non-
substrate derivatives that utilized the dense network of hydrogen
bonds available to the cytosine base. Towards this end, we synthe-
sized cyclopentane analogs of 1 as deoxyribose surrogates that dis-
played improved hydrolytic stability. One of the early molecules
that emerged from this approach was synthetic intermediate ester
5 (IC50 = 630 nM, Scheme 1) that prompted further investigation of
aryl substitution.
In vitro and cell potency of phenylsulfonamides 6a–f (see Scheme 1 for structures)
Compound no. R1 (4-position) R2 (3-position) IC50 (nM) EC50 (nM)
a
b
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
NO2
H
Br
Ph
H
H
H
H
H
Br
Ph
3200
3600
2700
350
1900
120
16,000
17,000
11,000
5500
2800
H
600
a
Inhibition of human dCK (IC50) was determined using a lysate filter-binding
assay.11
b
Cell-based assay was a rescue assay that utilized inhibition of dCK to avoid dCK-
mediated cytotoxicity of arabinoside C (Ara C).11
Ester 5 was prepared by a three step sequence beginning with the
palladium catalyzed
p-allyl reaction of allylic acetate 3 with the
sodium anion of 5-fluorocytosine to give an allylic alcohol in 80%
yield. Hydrogenation afforded saturated alcohol 4 (quantitative
yield) that was converted to 5 using the Martin Mitsunobuinversion.
Treatment of alcohol 4 with N-Boc-sulfonamides under similar
conditions followed by deprotection afforded phenyl sulfonamide
analogs such as 6a in low yields. Biphenylsulfonamides could be pre-
pared by reaction of a bromophenyl sulfonamide with boronic acids
under Suzuki conditions. Versatile intermediate amine 7, prepared
in 51% over three steps via a Boc-nosylate, was acylated with haloge-
nated aryl acids that were then further elaborated to biphenyl
analogs using Suzuki cross-couplings to give analogs 8a–e, 10.10
Replacement of the ester of 5 (IC50 = 630 nM) with a sulfon-
amide afforded 4-nitrophenylsulfonamide 6a with improved
chemical stability but approximately fivefold reduced activity.
Removal of the nitro group gave the nearly equipotent 6b. Biphenyl
analogs afforded potencies superior to our initial lead 5. Substitu-
tion at the 3-position was preferred to the 4-position (Table 1).
Although increasing the polarity of substituents generally had a
modest effect on the IC50, the effect on EC50 was dramatic (see
Table 2
In vitro and cell potency of m-biphenylsulfonamides 6g–s (see Scheme
structures)
1 for
Compound
no.
R1
R2 (3-position)
IC50
(nM)
EC50
(nM)
(4-position)
6g
6h
6i
6j
6k
6l
6m
6n
6o
6p
6q
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
4-Methylphenyl
4-Methoxyphenyl
4-Cyanophenyl
4-Methylsulfonyl
4-Aminocarboxy-phenyl
4-Carboxyphenyl
4-Chlorophenyl
3-Chlorophenyl
2-Chlorophenyl
2,4-Dichlorophenyl
4-Chloro-2-methylphenyl
110
64
49
63
89
15,300
51
79
45
21
500
300
390
1800
5900
n.d.
240
360
430
530
290
21
Table 2). For example, methyl substituted 6g and amide substituted
6k have similar IC50 values (110 nM and 89 nM, respectively),
however their EC50 values (500 nM and 5900 nM, respectively) are
separated by more than 10-fold. This trend is illustrated in the polar-
ities and potencies of 6g–k. Charged analogs (as in 6l) were not well
tolerated. There was not a strong preference for substitution at any
one position of the distal phenyl ring (as in 6m–o) and di-substitu-
tion appeared to be preferred (as in 6p, 6q).
NH2
N
NH2
N
NH2
N
F
F
F
N
O
N
O
c
N
O
a,b
H
2
When substituents from the biphenylsulfonamide series (6g–q)
were introduced onto a biphenylcarboxamide scaffold (see Table
3), the carboxamide analogs were generally more potent. Further-
more, frequent PK analysis of key analogs in mice allowed for
simultaneous optimization of PK and potency. A comparative PK
analysis was performed between the amide and sulfonamide series
(see Table 4). The amide analogs 8b, 8c and 8e were superior to the
corresponding sulfonamides 6h, 6m and 6q. In each instance, the
amide analogs had lower clearance and lower volume of distribu-
tion while maintaining greater exposure and oral bioavailability.
While discovery efforts focused mainly on the amide series, a
co-crystal structure was solved of dCK with the high-throughput
screening11 hit 9 (Fig. 2A; PDB code: 3IPY). Compound 9 bound
dCK in a new pocket, formed by reorienting four amino acid side
chains: Tyr 86, Tyr 204, Glu 196 and Glu 197. The biaryl region
of 9 occupies the newly formed pocket with one pyrimidine nitro-
+
OAc
HO
O
4
O
HO
F
3
d,e,f
g,h,i
O2N
5
NH2
NH2
N
F
N
NH2
N
F
N
O
N
O
j,k
N
O
HN
HN
O
O
S
O
H2N
HCl
X
7
R1
R2
6a-q
R
Table 3
8a-e, 10
In vitro and cell potency of m-biphenylamides 8a–e (see Scheme 1 for structures;
X = CH; R as shown below)
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) 2, NaOtBu, DMF; (ii) 3, Pd2(dba)3, PPh3,
THF, 80%; (b) 10% Pd/C, H2, MeOH (quant.); (c) PPh3, DEAD, 4-nitrophenylbenzoic
acid, THF, 66%; (d) N-Boc-sulfonamide, PPh3, DEAD, THF; (e) TFA, DCM (2–23%, two
steps); (f) boronic acid, Na2CO3, H2O, CH3CN, Pd(dppf)Cl2 (10–70%); (g) BocHN-Ns,
PPh3, DEAD, THF; (h) PhSH, K2CO3, CH3CN (51%, two steps); (i) HCl, dioxane, quant.;
(j) 3-bromobenzoic acid (X = CH) or 4-bromopyridine-2-carboxylic acid (X = N),
HATU, NMM, DMF or CH3CN (54–60%); (k) boronic acid, PdCl2(dppf), Na2CO3,
CH3CN, H2O (20–85%).
Ref no.
R
IC50 (nM)
EC50 (nM)
8a
8b
8c
8d
8e
Phenyl
260
30
42
23
21
910
100
270
180
170
4-Methoxyphenyl
4-Chlorophenyl
3-Chlorophenyl
4-Chloro-2-methylphenyl