with the TMS group at C-4 (19%), followed by desilylation.
Conveniently, the bulky TMS group controls the regiochemistry
of the reaction, which is highly selective (although low yielding)
for the 1,5-donor-acceptor-substituted 1,2,3-triazole product.13
Protodesilylation was accomplished under acidic conditions to
give 2 in high yield (78%). The regiochemistries of 1 and 2
are confirmed by the characteristic 1H NMR shifts for positions
C-4 and C-514 as well as by the X-ray crystal structures of the
precursors 11 (Figure 2) and 12 (see Supporting Information).
by the addition/elimination reaction of DMA-substituted
1,2,3-triazole (15) with (chloromethylidene)propanedinitrile
(16) (63%). The predominance of the 2H tautomer of the
1,2,3-triazole reactant18 and the corresponding stability of 6
over 3 and 4 according to calculations may explain this high
regioselectivity. The synthesis of isomer 7 was not attempted.
The UV/Vis spectra in CH2Cl2 of 1, 2, 5, 6 and 11 are
given in Figure 3.
Figure 3. UV/Vis spectra of 1 (black), 2 (red), 5 (blue), 6 (orange),
and 11 (purple) in CH2Cl2 at c ) 5 × 10-5 M.
Figure 2. ORTEP plot of crystal structure of 11 at 220 K, arbitrary
numbering. Atomic displacement parameters are drawn at the 50%
probability level.
As solids, isomers 1, 2 and 6 are red-orange in color, while
5 is brown. The spectra of all four isomers feature broad
CT absorptions of modest to strong intensity with maxima
between λmax ) 400 and 453 nm. Isomer 1 has its longest
wavelength CT absorption at λmax ) 400 nm (3.10 eV, ꢀ )
8.1 × 103 M-1 cm-1), while 2 absorbs at λmax ) 433 nm
(2.86 eV, ꢀ ) 2.5 × 103 M-1 cm-1). Silylated 11 has a
longest wavelength absorption at λmax ) 421 nm (2.94 eV,
ꢀ 1.7 × 103 M-1 cm-1), about 10 nm hypsochromatically
shifted compared to the desilylated analogue 2. Isomer 2 has
a B3LYP/6-31G(d)-optimized geometry where the DCV
moiety is nearly coplanar with the 1,2,3-triazole ring.19 The
gas-phase calculated and X-ray crystal structures of 11
compare well and are both nonplanar due to strong repelling
close contacts between the DCV and TMS groups. The X-ray
structure of Figure 2 shows the large out-of-plane twisting
of the DCV moiety with a torsion angle C4-C5-C6-C7
of 128°. (DMA torsion angle N2-N1-C16-C17 ) -57°).
Despite these geometric effects, the intramolecular CT is not
much affected. The conjugation pathway for isomer 5, which
avoids conjugation through the N-1 position, shows the
strongest CT band at λmax ) 423 nm (2.93 eV, ꢀ ) 11.3 ×
103 M-1 cm-1). Isomer 6, with the acceptor attached to N-2,
presents the longest-wavelength absorption of this series at
λmax) 453 nm (2.74 eV, ꢀ ) 7.3 × 103 M-1 cm-1). In all
The two isomers 3 and 4 were ultimately unobtainable
through the “click” or the thermal Huisgen cycloaddition
methodology. The most obvious approach involving reaction
of 4-ethynyl-N,N-dimethylaniline15 (13) with (azidometh-
ylidene)propanedinitrile16 in the presence (or absence) of
Cu(I) did not afford the expected target compounds 3 or 4,
even after the conditions were varied extensively.
Isomer 5 was obtained from alkyne 1417 by reaction with
NaN3 in DMF (61%) (Scheme 1). The tautomeric form with
hydrogen at N-2 is most stable according to calculations at
the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory. Isomer 6 was obtained
(12) (a) Moonen, N. N. P.; Pomerantz, W. C.; Gist, R.; Boudon, C.;
Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Kawai, T.; Kishioka, A.; Gross, M.; Irie, M.; Diederich,
F. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 3325. (b) Bures, F.; Schweizer, W. B.; May,
J. C.; Boudon, C.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Gross, M.; Biaggio, I.; Diederich, F.
Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 5378. (c) Meier, H.; Ju¨rgen, G.; Kolshorn, H.;
Mu¨hling, B. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 360. (d) Spitler, E. L.; Monson, J. M.;
Haley, M. M. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2211.
(13) Zanirato, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 2789.
(14) (a) Alonso, G.; Garcia-Lopez, M. T.; Garcia-Munor, G.; Madronera,
R.; Rico, M. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1970, 7, 1270. (b) Tsypin, G. I.;
Timofecva, G. N.; Mel’nikov, V. V.; Gidaspov, B. V. Zh. Org. Khim. 1975,
11, 1395.
(15) Leonard, K. A.; Nelen, M. I.; Anderson, L. T.; Gibson, S. L.; Hilf,
R.; Detty, M. R. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3942.
(16) Josey, A. D.; Dickinson, C. L.; Dewhirst, K. C.; McKusick, B. C.
J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 1941.
(18) Oziminski, W. P.; Dobrowolski, J. C.; Mazurek, A. P. J. Mol. Struct.
2003, 651-653, 697.
(17) (a) May, J. C.; Lim, J. H.; Biaggio, I.; Moonen, N. N. P.; Michinobu,
T.; Diederich, F. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 3057. (b) Michinobu, T.; May, J. C.;
Lim, J. H.; Boudon, C.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Seiler, P.; Gross, M.; Biaggio,
I.; Diederich, F. Chem. Commun. 2005, 737.
(19) For an X-ray crystal structure of a planar 1,5-substituted triazole,
see: Brunner, M.; Maas, G.; Klarner, F.-G. HelV. Chim. Acta 2005, 88,
1813.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 15, 2008
3349