C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Chart 2. Substrates Used to Probe Electronic Effects
(1) a three-centered C-N reductive elimination from an (unobserved)
CuIII(aryl)(amidate) intermediate or (2) bimolecular nucleophilic attack
of an amidate on the ipso carbon of the aryl ligand.12 Further studies will
be necessary to distinguish between these possibilities and to address other
open mechanistic questions, including the identity of the base that
participates in amide deprotonation and the origin of deviations from
linearity in the Brønsted plot (Figure 3).13
The results of this study reveal the extraordinary reactivity of the
CuIII-aryl fragment: C-N bond formation is facile despite stabilization
of the Cu-aryl ligand within a macrocyclic chelate and the use of
neutral amide-type substrates that are only weakly nucleophilic. That
reactions of this type have not been described previously, despite the
century-long history of Cu-mediated coupling reactions, highlights the
dearth of fundamental insights into the organometallic chemistry of
copper. Further characterization of the reactivity of high-valent
organocopper species should play an important role in the ongoing
discovery and development of copper-catalyzed reactions.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to the DOE (DE-FG02-
05ER15690) and Bristol-Myers Squibb for financial support of this
work, and we thank Ilia A. Guzei for X-ray crystallographic analysis
of 3a·(TsOH)3.
with respect to the acidity of the N-H bond, pKa(DMSO) ) 13.4-23.3
(Chart 2B). Reactions with each of the substrates 2a-h exhibited
pseudo-first-order kinetic behavior over >4 half-lives in the presence
of excess nucleophile (g10 equiv). Nucleophiles 2a-e produced the
corresponding C-N coupling products 3a-e in quantitative yield. The
remaining nucleophiles 2f-h, which have less-acidic N-H bonds,
reacted more slowly, and yielded two different products: the intermo-
lecular C-N coupling products 3f-h together with an intramolecular
C-N coupling product 4, arising from an unusual trans C-N reductive
elimination reaction (eq 2). The latter product formed quantitatively
upon heating a solution of the arylcopper(III) complex 1 in the absence
of added nucleophile.10
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
kinetic and compound characterization data. This material is available free
References
(1) Ullmann, F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36, 2382–2384.
(2) Cu-mediated coupling reactions continue to be the focus of extensive
interest. For reviews, see: (a) Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Coord.
Chem. ReV. 2004, 248, 2337–2364. (b) Hassan, J.; Sévignon, M.; Gozzi,
C.; Schulz, E.; Lemaire, M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1359–1469. (c) Ley,
S. V.; Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5400–5449.
(3) Krause, N. Modern Organocopper Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2002.
(4) For representative examples, see: (a) Willert-Porada, M. A.; Burton, D. J.;
Baenziger, N. C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 1633–1634. (b)
Naumann, D.; Roy, T.; Tebbe, K.-F.; Crump, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1993, 32, 1482–1483. (c) Furuta, H.; Maeda, H.; Osuka, A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 803–807. (d) Ribas, X.; Jackson, D. A.; Donnadieu,
B.; Mahía, J.; Parella, T.; Xifra, R.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Llobet,
A.; Stack, T. D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2991–2994. (e) Santo,
R.; Miyamoto, R.; Tanaka, R.; Nishioka, T.; Sato, K.; Toyota, K.; Obata,
M.; Yano, S.; Kinoshita, I.; Ichimura, A.; Takui, T. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 7611–7614.
(5) (a) Bertz, S. H.; Cope, S.; Murphy, M.; Ogle, C. A.; Taylor, B. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7208–7209. (b) Hu, H.; Snyder, J. P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 7210–7211. (c) Bertz, S. H.; Cope, S.; Dorton, D.; Murphy,
M.; Ogle, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7082–7085. (d) Gärtner,
T.; Henze, W.; Gschwind, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11362–
11363.
(6) For recent development of efficient Cu-catalyzed C-N coupling reactions,
see the following leading references: (a) Klapars, A.; Antilla, J. C.; Huang,
X.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7727–7729. (b) Shafir,
A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8742–8743.
(7) In addition to aryl-halide cross-coupling reactions (ref 6), Cu-catalyzed
oxidative C-N coupling reactions aryl boronic acids have been reported: (a)
Chan, D. M. T.; Monaco, K. L.; Wang, R.-P.; Winters, M. P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 2933–2936. (b) Lam, P. Y. S.; Clark, C. G.; Saubern, S.;
Adams, J.; Winters, M. P.; Chan, D. M. T.; Combs, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 2941–2944.
A rough correlation is evident between the logarithm of the pseudo-
first-order rate constant for intermolecular C-N coupling and the pKa
of the nitrogen nucleophile (not including pyridone; Figure 3). The
negative slope evident in this plot indicates that more-acidic substrates
(those with lower pKa values) react more rapidly. This correlation is
opposite to that expected if the bimolecular rate law (see above) arises
from a reaction of the neutral amide with the CuIII-aryl species.
Substrates with lower pKa values should be less coordinating and/or
nucleophilic and, therefore, react more slowly. Instead, the trend
suggests that the nitrogen nucleophile undergoes deprotonation before
(or in) the rate-limiting step of the reaction. The anomalously rapid
rate observed with pyridone may reflect the fact that pyridone has a
readily accessible tautomer, 2-hydroxypyridine (eq 3),11 which may
be capable of reacting without prior substrate deprotonation.
(8) Xifra, R.; Ribas, X.; Llobet, A.; Poater, A.; Duran, M.; Solà, M.; Stack,
T. D. P.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; Donnadieu, B.; Mahía, J.; Parella, T.
Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 5146–5156.
(9) Reaction conditions: [1x] ) 9 mM, [phthalimide] ) 50 mM, CD3CN, 24 °C.
(10) See section 1 of the Supporting Information for further details.
(11) In acetonitrile at 25 °C, the pyridone tautomer is more stable than
2-hydroxypyridine by approx 3 kcal/mol: Frank, J.; Katritzky, A. R.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1976, 1428–1431.
(12) Mechanistic evidence suggests the nitrogen nucleophile coordinates to the
Cu center before C-N bond formation in Cu-catalyzed cross-coupling
reactions. See, for example: Strieter, E. R.; Blackmond, D. G.; Buchwald,
S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4120–4121.
Figure 3. Correlation between the rate of intermolecular C-N bond
formation and the acidity of the nitrogen nucleophile. Reaction conditions:
[1] ) 0.8 mM, [nucleophile] ) 8.0 mM, CH3CN, 50 °C.
(13) The deviations do not appear to reflect a major change in the reaction
mechanism. The reaction of benzamide, a slow nucleophile, exhibits
bimolecular reaction kinetics and a negative ∆Sq (-9.4 ( 2.5 eu), similar
to that observed with phthalimide, and more-acidic benzamide derivatives
(i.e., 4-Br and 4-NO2) react more rapidly than benzamide (see section 2 of
the Supporting Information for details).
The kinetic data and electronic effects obtained for these reactions are
consistent with at least two different mechanisms for C-N bond formation:
JA802123P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 29, 2008 9197