C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 4. SDS-PAGE analysis of E. coli cell lysates expressing either alkene-Z
or wt-Z after treatment with tetrazole 1: left panel, Coomassie blue staining;
right panel, fluorescence in-gel imaging (λex ) 365 nm). The experiment was
repeated three times independently and similar results were obtained.
the tetrazole reactivity and apply this chemistry to alkene functional-
ization in mammalian cells are currently underway.
Figure 3. Selective functionalization of alkene-Z by tetrazole 1 in E. coli
cells: CFP channel (top row) and DIC channel (bottom row) images of bacterial
cells expressing either alkene-Z (a,c) or wt-Z (b,d) proteins after treatment with
100 µM tetrazole 1. An 100× oil immersion lens was used.
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge the Petroleum
Research Fund (PRF No. 45503-G4), SUNY Buffalo, and New York
State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences for
financial support. We thank Prof. Peter Schultz at Scripps Research
Institute for providing the pLEIZ, pLEIZ-7TAG, pBK-ALRS plasmids
used in this study.
second-order rate constant of 0.00202 ( 0.00007 M-1 s-1, based on
the HPLC analysis.16 By comparison, the cycloaddition reaction
between tetrazole 1 and acrylamide showed an apparent second-order
rate constant of 0.15 M-1 s-1, 75-fold faster than that of allyl phenyl
ether,16 presumably due to the lower LUMO energy of acrylamide,
and thus better dipole HOMO-dipolarophile LUMO overlap.18
To examine whether this photoclick chemistry can be used to
functionalize alkene-containing proteins in E. coli, BL21(DE3) cells
expressing either wt-Z or O-allyl-tyrosine containing Z-domain proteins
were suspended in the PBS buffer containing 5% glycerol and 100
µM tetrazole 1. After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the cell
suspensions were irradiated with a hand-held 302-nm UV lamp for 4
min. The bacterial cells were then incubated at 4 °C overnight to allow
the cycloaddition reaction to proceed to completion. Because spec-
troscopic properties16 of the pyrazoline match closely to that of cyan
fluorescent protein (CFP), we were able to use a fluorescent microscope
equipped with the CFP filter set (ex 438/24 nm, em 483/32 nm) to
monitor the cycloaddition reaction in vivo. In the CFP channel, only
E. coli cells expressing alkene-Z showed strong fluorescence while
cells expressing wt-Z did not (Figure 3a,b), indicating that the
cycloaddition reaction is selective toward the alkene functional group.19
In the DIC channel, the cell density for the alkene-Z expressing cells
was lower than that of the wt-Z expressing cells (Figure 3c,d), which
can be attributed to significantly slower bacterial growth rate in the
GMML medium (the culture medium used for the genetic incorporation
of O-allyl-tyrosine). There was no apparent treatment-induced toxicity
observed, including potential photo damages, presumably due to short
irradiation time (4 min).
To verify that the fluorescence observed in E. coli arose from the
photoclick chemistry, the treated bacterial cells were lysed and the
lysates were subjected to in-gel fluorescence analysis. Only one
fluorescent band with the size matching that of Z-domain was observed
in the alkene-Z lysate, but not in the wt-Z lysate (Figure 4), indicating
that indeed the fluorescence was due to selective formation of the
fluorescent pyrazoline-Z adduct.
In summary, we have demonstrated that a tetrazole-based, photoclick
chemistry can be employed to selectively functionalize an alkene
genetically encoded in a protein inside E. coli cells. The reaction
procedure was simple, straightforward, and nontoxic to E. coli cells
with the only required external reagents to be tetrazoles and photons.
Additionally, fluorescent cycloadducts were formed, which enabled a
facile monitoring of the reaction in vivo. The efforts to further optimize
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization data for all compounds. This material is available free of
References
(1) (a) Prescher, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Nat. Chem. Biol 2005, 1, 13–21. (b)
van Swieten, P. F.; Leeuwenburgh, M. A.; Kessler, B. M.; Overkleeft, H. S.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 20–27. (c) Barglow, K. T.; Cravatt, B. F.
Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 822–827.
(2) For a recent example, see: Carrico, I. S.; Carlson, B. L.; Bertozzi, C. R.
Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 321-322.
(3) (a) Mahal, L. K.; Yarema, K. J.; Bertozzi, C. R. Science 1997, 276, 1125–
1128. (b) Zhang, Z.; Smith, B. A. C.; Wang, L.; Brock, A.; Cho, C.; Schultz,
P. G. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 6735–6746. (c) Chen, I.; Howarth, M.; Lin,
W.; Ting, A. Y. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 99–104.
(4) Saxon, E.; Bertozzi, C. R. Science 2000, 287, 2007–2010.
(5) Deiters, A.; Cropp, T. A.; Mukherji, M.; Chin, J. W.; Anderson, J. C.;
Schultz, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11782–11783.
(6) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596–2599.
(7) (a) Agard, N. J.; Prescher, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 15046–15047. (b) Baskin, J. M.; Prescher, J. A.; Laughlin, S. T.; Agard,
N. J.; Chang, P. V.; Miller, I. A.; Lo, A.; Codelli, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 16793–16797.
(8) (a) van Kasteren, S. I.; Kramer, H. B.; Jensen, H. H.; Campbell, S. J.;
Kirkpatrick, J.; Oldham, N. J.; Anthony, D. C.; Davis, B. G. Nature 2007,
446, 1105–1109. (b) Chang, P. V.; Prescher, J. A.; Hangauer, M. J.;
Bertozzi, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8400–8401.
(9) (a) Mortell, K. H.; Gingras, M.; Kiessling, L. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 12053–12054. (b) Miller, S. J.; Blackwell, H. E.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9606–9614. (c) Nicolaou, K. C.; Hughes, R.; Cho,
S. Y.; Winssinger, N.; Labischinski, H.; Endermann, R. Chem.sEur. J.
2001, 7, 3824–3843.
(10) (a) Otto, S.; Engberts, J. B. F. N. Pure App. Chem. 2000, 72, 1365–1372.
(b) de Arau´jo, A. D.; Palomo, J. M.; Cramer, J.; Ko¨hn, M.; Schro¨der, H.;
Wacker, R.; Niemeyer, C.; Alexandrov, K.; Waldmann, H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 45, 296–301.
(11) Gothelf, K. V.; Jorgensen, K. A. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 863–909.
(12) van Hest, J. C. M.; Kiick, K. L.; Tirrell, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 1282–1288.
(13) Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Brock, A.; Schultz, P. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 2840–2842.
(14) (a) Wang, J.; Schiller, S. M.; Schultz, P. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 6849–6851. (b) Bernardes, G. J.; Chalker, J. M.; Errey, J. C.; Davis,
B. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5052–5053.
(15) Song, W.; Wang, Y.; Qu, J.; Madden, M. M.; Lin, Q. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2008, 47, 2832–2835.
(16) See Supporting Information for further details.
(17) Tetrazoles 1, 2, and 7 showed similar reaction kinetics in the initial study.
(18) Houk, K. N.; Sims, J.; Watts, C. R.; Luskus, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973,
95, 7301–7315.
(19) In the absence of suitable dipolarophiles, the in situ generated nitrile imines
undergo slow water quenching reactions; see ref 15.
JA803598E
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 30, 2008 9655