SCHEME 1. Coupling of Diiodoalkenes and Conjugated
Alkenes
Hydroxyapatite-Supported Palladium-Catalyzed
Efficient Synthesis of
(E)-2-Alkene-4-ynecarboxylic Esters. Intense
Fluorescene Emission of Selected Compounds
Brindaban C. Ranu,* Laksmikanta Adak, and
Kalicharan Chattopadhyay
Department of Organic Chemistry, Indian Association for the
CultiVation of Science, JadaVpur, Kolkata - 700 032, India
here a facile synthesis of (E)-2-alkene-4-ynoate system by the
coupling of Vicinal-diiodoalkenes with conjugated carboxylic
esters catalyzed by nonstoichiometric PdHAP (Scheme 1). The
TEM image of our fresh and used nonstoichiometric PdHAP
catalyst did not show discrete particles (see the Supporting
Information) corresponding to Pd(0).3c
ReceiVed January 27, 2008
The stereodefined 2-en-4-ynoate moiety or its derivatives are
of considerable interest in organic synthesis because of their
presence in many natural products of promising biological
activities5 and their potential as advanced materials for electronic
and photonic applications.6 This unit is usually synthesized by
homogeneous Pd- or Pd/Cu- or Cu-catalyzed coupling of alkyne
or an organometallic alkyne and a vinyl halide.7–9 Recently,
we reported a Pd nanoparticle-catalyzed coupling of Vic-
diiodoalkenes and conjugated alkenes to build up this unit.10
However, none of these methods7–9 including ours10 offered
satisfactory catalytic recyclability and large turnover number
(TON). To accommodate these two prime criteria for industrial
applications, we considered a heterogeneous HAP-based catalyst
for this important reaction.
The experimental procedure is very simple. A stirred mixture
of Vic-diiodoalkene, acrylic ester in N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP)
was heated at 90-100 °C in the presence of PdHAP and K2CO3
for a certain period of time (TLC). Standard workup provided
the product. The catalyst, PdHAP, was recycled up to three times
without appreciable loss of efficiency (see the Experimental
Procedure and Table 5).
A simple procedure for the synthesis of substituted (E)-2-
alkene-4-ynecarboxylic esters has been achieved using hy-
droxyapatite-supported palladium as efficient catalyst surface.
The catalyst is recycled, and the turnover number (TON)
based on Pd is 16000. A naphthyl-substituted derivative gives
very intense fluorescence emission.
Catalysis by palladium anchored on a heterogeneous support
for carbon-carbon coupling has received tremendous attention
in recent times.1 The main advantages of heterogeneous catalysts
compared to their homogeneous counterparts are ease of
separation, reusability, improved efficiency due to stable active
site and better steric control of a reaction intermediate.2 These
qualities of heterogeneous catalysts made them very promising
for applications in industry.
Several substituted Vic-diiodoalkenes underwent coupling with
acrylic esters under the catalysis of PdHAP by this procedure
to produce the corresponding enynecarboxylic esters in high
yields. The results are summarized in Table 3.
Hydroxyapatite, a Ca-phosphate complex, is found to be one
of the best active heterogeneous supports cabable of accom-
modating a variety of metals and metal salts.3 One of these
hydroxyapatite-supported palladium complexes, nonstoichio-
metric PdHAP containing Pd2+, has been used very successfully
for the Heck and Suzuki coupling reactions.4 We now report
Both aryl- and alkyl-substituted diiodoalkenes participated
in this reaction. The coupling is stereoselective, giving (E)-esters
in all reactions. The Br, Cl, and F substituents on the aromatic
ring (entries 5-9, Table 3) of the aryl group did not interfere
in the coupling with diiodoalkenes. The corresponding Vic-
dibromoalkenes (entry 17, Table 3) also coupled with acrylic
(1) Yin, L.; Leibescher, J. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 133–173.
(2) (a) Gates, B. C. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 511–522. (b) Bergbreiter, D. E.
Med. Res. ReV. 1999, 19, 439–450.
(5) (a) Zein, N.; Sinha, A. M.; McGahren, W. J.; Ellestad, G. A. Science
1988, 240, 1198–1201. (b) Rudi, A.; Schleyer, M.; Kashman, Y. J. Nat. Prod.
2000, 63, 1434–1436. (c) Iverson, S. L.; Uetrecht, J. P. Chem. Res. Toxicol.
2001, 14, 175–181.
(3) (a) Ho, C.-M.; Yu, W.-y.; Chem, C.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 3303–3307. (b) Yamaguchi, K.; Mori, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7144–7145. (c) Mori, K.; Hara, T.; Mizugaki,
T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10657–10666. (d)
Hara, T.; Mori, K.; Oshiba, M.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. Green
Chem. 2004, 10, 507–509. (e) Choudary, B. M.; Sridhar, C.; Kantam, M. L.;
Venkanna, G. T.; Sreedhar, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9948–9949. (f)
Kantam, M. L.; Venkanna, G. T.; Sridhar, C.; Sreedhar, B.; Choudary, B. M. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 9522–9524.
(6) Martin, R. E.; Diederich, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1350–
1377.
(7) (a) Nishimura, T.; Araki, H.; Maeda, Y.; Uemura, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
2997–2999. (b) Jeffery, T. Synthesis 1987, 70–71.
(8) (a) Takuchi, R.; Tanabe, K.; Tanaka, S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1558–
1561. (b) Negishi, E.-I.; Anastasia, L. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1979–2018.
(9) (a) Bates, C. G.; Saejueng, P.; Venkataraman, D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1441–
1444. (b) Hoshi, M.; Shirakawa, K. Synlett 2002, 1101–1104.
(10) Ranu, B. C.; Chattopadhyay, K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2409–2412.
(4) Mori, K.; Yamaguchi, K.; Hara, T.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11572–11573.
10.1021/jo800209z CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 06/18/2008
2008 American Chemical Society
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5609–5612 5609