C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
structures (4) when excess carbonyl compound is present, and these
are thermodynamically more stable than the isomeric aldolates. This
“self-enolization” clearly has relevance to the role that LBHBs play
in enzyme catalyzed enolizations.16 Carbonyl compounds with less
favorable keto-enol equilibria do not form such dimers (1d), or
form them only transiently (2). In the latter case we were able to
follow the self-aldol condensation and elucidate its mechanism.
Figure 3. Self-aldol reaction of 2 at -125 °C in 3:2 THF/ether. In the
first step, 2 was injected into a solution of P4.
the H-dimer 4a and the enolate 3b, with P4 preferentially
deprotonating the more acidic ketone 1b. At a full equivalent of
base, the solution consisted of the enolates 3a and 3b.
Like 1a, the aldehyde 1c is converted quantitatively to the enolate
3c with 1 equiv of P4. At lower equivalents the H-bonded dimer
4c (mixture of E/Z isomers) is the major species formed (60% at
0.5 equiv of P4), but there are several minor components that have
not been identified (possible aldol products). Because of their high
propensity for aldol reactions, aldehyde metal enolates have been
rarely studied spectroscopically.11
Acknowledgment. The authors wish to thank Dr. Bob Shanks
and Dr. Charlie Fry for NMR assistance. We thank NSF for
financial support (Grant CHE-0074657) and funding for instru-
mentation (Grants NSF CHE-9709065, CHE-9304546).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and NMR
spectra. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
The interaction of ester 1d with P4 has been previously studied.3
We find that P4 stoichiometrically forms the enolate 3d at -120
°C, with no indication of any H-bonded dimer 4d or Claisen
products. Apparently the energetic cost of enolization of 1d to 5d
outweighs the stabilizing effect of H-bond formation. Even the
RINMR injection of HCl into the enolate at -135 °C failed to form
either 4d or the ester enol 5d, only 1d was detected.
The effect of P4 on p-fluoroacetophenone (2) was more complex.
Unlike the behavior of 1a, the addition of 0.5 equiv of P4 to
solutions of 2 at -78 °C did not produce the H-dimer 8, but instead
the ketone self-aldol condensation product 12. RINMR experiments
using 19F and 1H NMR spectroscopy in which 2 was injected into
(1) Schwesinger, R.; Hasenfratz, C.; Schlemper, H.; Walz, L.; Peters, E. M.;
Peters, K.; von Schnering, H. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32,
1361–1363.
(2) (a) Seebach, D.; Pietzonka, T. Chem. Ber. 1991, 124, 1837–1843. Seebach,
D.; Bezencon, O.; Jaun, B.; Pietzonka, T.; Matthews, J. L.; Ku¨hnle, F. N.;
Schweizer, W. B. HelV. Chim. Acta 1996, 79, 588–608. (b) Solladie´-Cavallo,
A.; Crescenzi, B. Synlett 2000, 327–330. Kobayashi, K.; Ueno, M.; Kondo,
Y. Chem. Commun. 2006, 3128–3130. (c) Ueno, M.; Hori, C.; Suzawa,
K.; Ebisawa, M.; Kondo, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1965–1968. Suzawa,
K.; Ueno, M.; Wheatley, A. E.; Kondo, Y. Chem. Commun. 2006, 4850–
4852. (d) Imahori, T.; Kondo, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8082–
8083. (e) Tanaka, Y.; Arakawa, M.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Hori, C.; Ueno, M.;
Tanaka, T.; Imahori, T.; Kondo, Y. Chem. Asian J. 2006, 1, 581–585.
(3) (a) Solladie´-Cavallo, A.; Liptaj, T.; Schmitt, M.; Solgadi, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 415–418. (b) Fruchart, J.-S.; Lippens, G.; Kuhn, C.; Gras-
Masse, H.; Melnyk, O. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 526–532. Fruchart, J.-S.;
Gras-Masse, H.; Melnyk, O.; Fox, D. T.; Bergman, R. G. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 2243.
a solution of P4 at -118 °C initially produced the enolate 7 (t1/2
,
(4) The CR (Cꢀ) 13C NMR shifts are (Z isomer): δ 173.2 (87.3) for 3a, 165.1
(94.1) for 4a, 168.5 (96.1) for the lithium enolate dimer, 152.5 (109.4) for
the enol silyl ether of 1a, and 155.4 (106.7) for the enol methyl ether of
1a. The shifts of 5a were sensitive to the counterion, presumably due to
hydrogen-bonding interactions: δ 158.2 (98.7) for 5a from HCl injection,
155.0 (100.9) for HBF4 injection. The enol proton shifts were also sensitive
to counterion, appearing at δ 11.5 (HCl) and 9.5 (HBF4).
(5) The lithium enolate of dibenzyl ketone has been previously studied. (a)
Gareyev, R.; Ciula, J. C.; Streitwieser, A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4589–
4593. Its behavior with P4 is nearly identical to that of 1a.
(6) Hibbert, F.; Emsley, J. AdV. Phys. Org. Chem. 1990, 26, 255–379.
(7) H-bonded dimers of enolic ꢀ-dicarbonyl compounds7a and phenols7b have
been previously reported. (a) Aladzheva, I. M.; Petrovskii, P. V.; Mast-
ryukova, T. A.; Kabachnik, M. I. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1980, 50, 1442–1445;
English translation, 1980, 50, 1161-1164. Arnett, E. D.; Harrelson, J. A.
Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1987, 117, 237–243. (b) Bordwell, F. G.; McCallum,
R. J.; Olmstead, W. N. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1424–1427. Shan, S.; Loh,
S.; Herschlag, D. Science 1996, 272, 97–101.
ca. 1 min), followed by a self-aldol process with a t1/2 ) 30 min
(Figure 3). During the first 10 min a small amount of H-bonded
dimer 8 (3.5% compared to 7) was detected.12 The first-formed
product was a new species which we have identified as a 1:1
aldolate enolate hydrogen bonded complex 11 (δOH 12.4).13 The
rate of formation of 11 was first order in 2 and 7 and showed a
deuterium isotope effect of 1.0 when R-trideuterated 2 was used.
Intermediate 11 was then converted over several hours to the final
stable product of this sequence, the hydrogen-bonded aldolate
enolate 12 (δOH 11.7). This conversion showed a H/D kinetic isotope
effect of 2.4.
From these and other observations we conclude that the H-dimer
8 is in an unfavorable equilibrium with the enolate 7 and ketone 2.
Formation of the aldolate 10 is the rate determining step, but none
was detected since it rapidly deprotonates another ketone producing
the observed 11. Finally, 11 is converted by proton transfer and
loss of ketone in an irreversible step to 12.
In comparison, the reaction of 7 with p-fluorobenzaldehyde was
too fast to measure at -127 °C by RINMR (kobs g 2 s-1).14 Based
on temperature extrapolation of the rate of reaction of 2 with 7,
the aldehyde is at least 50000 times as reactive as the ketone.
Interestingly, the first-formed aldolate 13 was again not detected.
The products were acetal 1:2 adducts (14),15 in which the aldolate
is stabilized by addition to a second equivalent of aldehyde.
We have identified and characterized several phosphazenium
enolates generated with P4. Some of these enolates (3a, 3b, and
3c) form unique kinetically stable hydrogen-bonded dimeric
(8) Pan, Y.; McAllister, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8171–8176.
(9) Jones, A. C.; Sanders, A. W.; Bevan, M. J.; Reich, H. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 29, 3492–3493.
(10) Kumar, G. A.; McAllister, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6968–6972.
(11) Wen, J. Q; Grutzner, J. B. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 4220–4224.
(12) Transient solutions of 8 (t1/2 ) ca. 5 s), and 9 (t1/2 ) ca. 30 min) could be
formed by injection of HCl-etherate into solutions of 7 in 3:2 THF/ether
at-118 °C. More stable solution of 8 (t1/2 ) ca. 15 min), and 9 (t1/2 > 2 h
were formed in Me2O at-138 °C, which allowed characterization by 19F,
1H, and 13C NMR spectroscopy.
(13) Compound 11 could be fully characterized by 13C, 1H, 31P, and 19F NMR
spectroscopy. Saturation transfer measurements showed the enolate portion
of 11 to be in exchange with the enolate 7 in solution.
(14) For a previous RINMR study of a crossed aldol reaction see: Palmer, C. A.;
Ogle, C. A.; Arnett, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5619–5625.
(15) AsimilaradducthasbeenobservedfortheTASenolateofcyclohexanone:Nakamura,
E.; Shimizu, M.; Kuwajima, I.; Sakata, J.; Yokoyama, K.; Noyori, R. J.
Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 932–945.
(16) Cleland, W. W.; Frey, P. A.; Gerlt, J. A. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273,
25529–25532.
JA804221X
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 30, 2008 9669