challenge.4 Current approaches to the synthesis of libraries
of bis-THF acetogenin analogues require use of multiple
complex starting materials5 or additional steps to install
flanking hydroxyl groups after establishment of the bis-THF
core.6
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of 10-Hydroxytrilobacin (4a)
Preliminary studies in our laboratory demonstrated the
potential for use of the [3 + 2]-annulation reaction7 for
synthesis of adjacent bis-THF acetogenin analogues.8 The
stereochemistry of the two THF rings is set by using either
a nonchelate (BF3·OEt2 catalyzed) or a chelate controlled
(SnCl4 catalyzed) [3 + 2]-annulation reaction of a chiral
allylsilane with the appropriate aldehyde coupling partner.
Although we previously reported syntheses of asimicin and
bullatacin using the [3 + 2]-annulation reaction,2a,b these
syntheses were too linear and correspondingly lengthy. This
prevented us from using these routes to capitalize on the
implicit stereodivergency of the [3 + 2]-annulation reaction
for generation of stereochemically diverse bis-THF aceto-
genin analogues. Therefore, we have developed and report
herein a convergent, highly stereoselective and stereodiver-
gent synthesis of four representative adjacent bis-THF
acetogenins using [3 + 2]-annulation reactions of chiral,
nonracemic ꢀ-alkoxy allylsilanes 1 and 3.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Allylsilane Fragment 3
We targeted the synthesis of 10-hydroxytrilobacin3 (4a),
a natural acetogenin with a cis/erythro/trans bis-THF core
unit which displays high cytotoxicity toward two human
cancer cell lines, A-549 (LC50 ) 1.0 × 10-8 µg/mL) and
MCF-7 (LC50 ) 1.9 × 10-8 µg/mL).3 We anticipated 10-
hydroxytrilobacin (4a) could be generated by Sonogashira
coupling9 of the bis-THF alkyne fragment 5a and the
butenolide-containing vinyl iodide 6 (Scheme 1). The bis-
THF unit of 5a would be accessed by a nonchelate-controlled
[3 + 2]-annulation of cis-THF aldehyde 2a and allylsilane
3. On the basis of earlier studies, it was anticipated that this
[3 + 2]-annulation would be stereochemically mismatched8
and therefore synthetically challenging. The cis-THF alde-
hyde 2a would be derived from allylsilane 1 by a nonchelate-
controlled [3 + 2]-annulation.7c The allylsilane subunit of 3
would be introduced by using an asymmetric γ-silylallylbo-
ration reaction,10 whereas the chiral propargyl alcohol center
of 3 would be generated by transfer hydrogenation of a
propargyl ketone precursor.11 We anticipated that the buteno-
lide 6 could be obtained from the ꢀ-hydroxy-γ-lactone 8,
which in turn would be assembled via the aldol reaction of
ester 9 and aldehyde 10.
The synthesis of allylsilane 3 began with nucleophilic
addition of trimethylsilylethynyl lithium to methyl adipoyl
chloride (7),12 followed by a Noyori asymmetric transfer
hydrogenation using chiral catalyst 1213 which provided
propargyl alcohol 13 with 97% ee and 76% yield for two
steps (Scheme 2). After protection of 13 as the TBS ether
(97%), the ester unit of 14 was reduced by treatment with
DIBAL-H to yield aldehyde 15 (68%). Asymmetric allylation
of 15 with γ-silylallylborane 1610 and then protection of the
new hydroxyl group as a TBS ether afforded 3 in 65% yield
for the two steps, and with 95% ee.
The synthesis of the butenolide fragment 6 was initiated
by B-iododicyclohexylborane-mediated aldol reaction14 of
ester 9 and chiral aldehyde 10,15 followed by lactonization
triggered by treatment of the aldol mixture with HF (Scheme
3). Lactone 8 was obtained as the major component of a
mixture of diastereomers (4.7:1, ratio of 8 to the sum of three
(4) (a) Kojima, N.; Maezaki, N.; Tominaga, H.; Yanai, M.; Urabe, D.;
Tanaka, T. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 672. For library approaches to mono-
THF acetogenins: (b) Kojima, N.; Maezaki, N.; Tominaga, H.; Asai, M.;
Yanai, M.; Tanaka, T. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 4980. (c) Curran, D. P.;
Zhang, Q.; Richard, C.; Lu, H.; Gudipati, V.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 9561.
(5) Das, S.; Li, L. S.; Abraham, S.; Chen, Z.; Sinha, S. C. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 5922.
(6) Wysocki, L. M.; Dodge, M. W.; Voight, E. A.; Burke, S. D. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 5637.
(7) (a) Masse, C. E.; Panek, J. S. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 1293. (b) Panek,
J. S.; Beresis, R. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 809. (c) Micalizio, G. C.; Roush,
W. R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 461.
(8) Mertz, E.; Tinsley, J. M.; Roush, W. R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
8035.
(12) Carbery, D. R.; Reignier, S.; Myatt, J. W.; Miller, N. D.; Harrity,
J. P. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2584.
(9) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975,
16, 4467.
(13) Haack, K.-J.; Hashiguchi, S.; Fujii, A.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 285.
(10) Roush, W. R.; Pinchuk, A. N.; Micalizio, G. C. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 9413.
(14) Ganesan, K.; Brown, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2336.
(15) Bongini, A.; Camerini, R.; Hofman, S.; Panunzio, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1994, 35, 8045.
(11) Matsumura, K.; Hashiguchi, S.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 8738.
3372
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 15, 2008