Y. Hirokawa et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 19 (2008) 1167–1170
1169
J = 4.0 Hz
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
OMe
OMe
a−c
a, b
a, b
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
O
TIPSO
(1R,2S)-6i
TIPSO
TIPSO
O
O
O
HO
HO
O
6d (syn)
syn-8
Me
10
OMe
OMe
c, d
Me
J = 8.3 Hz
Scheme 5. Reagents and conditions: (a) TBAF, THF, rt, (b) cat. TEMPO, cat. n-Bu4NI,
NCS, CH2Cl2–H2O, pH 8.6, rt; (c) H2, cat. Rh(PPh3)3Cl, toluene, rt (40% in three steps).
OMe
OMe
HO
O
TIPSO
Me
anti-8
1-epi-6d (anti)
Et
Et
a
Me
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) TBAF, THF, rt; (b) cat. TEMPO, cat. n-Bu4NI,
NCS, CH2Cl2–H2O, pH 8.6, rt (50% for syn-8 and 85% for anti-8 each in two steps); (c)
cat. TPAP, NMO, CH2Cl2–CH3CN (9:1), 4 Å MS, rt (98%); and (d) L-SelectrideÒ, THF,
ꢀ78 °C then 30% H2O2, acetone, rt (91%).
TIPSO
O
HO
(1R,2S)-6j
(>99% ee)
5j
Scheme 6. Reagents and conditions: (a) t-BuLi, (S,S)-Box-t-Bu 9, hexane, ꢀ78 °C
Me Me
(69%).
Me
S
O
O
R
a
diate of 3-epi-eupomatilone 6,16 we have achieved a formal syn-
thesis of 3-epi-eupomatilone 6.
5a−i
TIPSO
Ar
N
N
HO
(Table 2)
t-Bu
t-Bu
(1R,2S)-6a−i
9
The effect of the 2-methoxy group is unclear, but the oxygen
appears to play an important role in the effect. In order to confirm
the role of the 2-methoxy group, we synthesized the 2-ethylbenzyl
equivalent 5j in 63% yield by the general procedure shown in
Scheme 2. The asymmetric [2,3]-Wittig reaction of 5j afforded 6j
in 69% yield and with excellent enantioselectivity (>99% ee)
(Scheme 6) in contrast to that of 2-methoxybenzyl ether 5d (8%
ee).à Presumably, coordination of the methoxy group to the lithium
cation rather than the steric effect would retard the high selectivity.
Further studies including the reaction mechanism are in progress.
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) t-BuLi, (S,S)-Box-t-Bu 9, hexane, ꢀ78 °C
(Table 2).
Table 2
Asymmetric [2,3]-Wittig rearrangement of benzylic ethers 5a–ia
Entry
Ar
Product
Yieldb (%)
eec (%)
1
2d
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Phenyl
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
6h
6i
65
34
75
73
32
72
58
58
76
98
98
95
8
87
99
17
22
85
4-Methoxyphenyl
3-Methoxyphenyl
2-Methoxyphenyl
3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl
3,5-Dimethoxyphenyl
2,3-Dimethoxyphenyl
2,5-Dimethoxyphenyl
3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have investigated the [2,3]-Wittig rearrange-
ment of various benzyl ethers. As a result, we have found that (S,S)-
Box-t-Bu 9 is an effective ligand for oxygenated benzylic ethers.
The substitution of the methoxy group affected the chemical yield
and enantioselectivity, depending on its position. The products will
become versatile intermediates for the synthesis of lignans.
a
Reactions were carried out using benzylic ether (1 equiv), t-BuLi (10 equiv), and
(S,S)-Box-t-Bu 9 (5 equiv) in hexane at ꢀ78 °C for 2 h.
b
Isolated yield.
c
Determined by chiral HPLC analysis.
A trace of [1,2]-Wittig rearrangement product was produced as a by-product.
d
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the financial support of a Grant-in-Aid for Sci-
entific Research (C) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Sci-
ence (No. 18590097) and Osaka Ohtani University Research Fund
(Pharmaceutical Sciences).
5 and 6), 2,3- and 2,5-dimethoxybenzyl ethers 5g and 5h with an
ortho-methoxy substituent afforded products with low enantio-
meric excess (entries 7 and 8). The 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzyl ether
5i, bearing no methoxy group at the ortho-position, afforded a
product with high enantiomeric excess (entry 9).
References
The absolute configuration of the secondary alcohols was deter-
mined by a modified Mosher method,15 after conversion of alcohols
6b–d into the corresponding (+)- and (ꢀ)-a-methoxy-a-(trifluoro-
methyl)phenylacetic acid (MTPA) esters. Thus, the stereochemistry
of the major products was determined as (1R,2S). The absolute con-
figuration of the other products was assumed by analogy with
them. The assignment was also confirmed by conversion of 6i
1. (a) Tomooka, K. Chemistry of Organolithium Compounds 2004, 2, 749–828; (b)
Hiersemann, M.; Abraham, L.; Pollex, A. Synlett 2003, 1088–1095; (c)
McGowan, G. Aust. J. Chem. 2002, 55, 799; (d) Nakai, T.; Tomooka, K. Pure
Appl. Chem. 1997, 69, 595–600; (e) Nakai, T.; Mikami, K. Org. React. 1994, 46,
105–209; (f) Marshall, J. A. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: New York, 1991; Vol. 3, pp 975–1014.
2. Kang, J.; Cho, W. O.; Cho, H. G.; Oh, H. J. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1994, 15, 732–
739.
3. (a) Tomooka, K.; Komine, N.; Nakai, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5513–5516;
(b) Tomooka, K.; Komine, N.; Nakai, T. Chirality 2000, 12, 505–509.
4. Manabe, S. Chem. Commun. 1997, 737–738.
5. (a) Kawasaki, T.; Kimachi, T. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6847–6862; (b) Kawasaki, T.;
Kimachi, T. Synlett 1998, 1429–1431.
21
(85% ee) into known c-lactone 10 {½aꢁD ¼ þ67:3 (c 0.34, CHCl3)}
23
and comparison of the specific rotation {lit.16 ½aꢁD ¼ þ57:1 (c 0.2,
CHCl3)} (Scheme 5). Since the c-lactone 10 is a synthetic interme-
6. Barrett, I. M.; Breeden, S. W. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 3015–3017.
7. Gibson, S. E.; Ham, P.; Jefferson, G. R. Chem. Commun. 1998, 123–124.
The reaction of 5b using (ꢀ)-sparteine was sluggish and the expected 6b was not
obtained. Instead, SN20 reaction of t-BuLi to 5b and elimination of triisopropylsilan-
olate occurred with 53% yield along with 41% recovery of 5b.
à
The absolute configuration of 6j was determined by the modified Mosher method.