C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
isomerization of 6 and 6′. The presence of a bulky Ph group in the
equatorial plane of 6 would diminish the energy required for
dissociation of an adjacent pyridyl.
To probe the option of B-to-PtIV Ph group transfer we attempted
transformation of 8 to its isomer 7. Complex 88 was characterized
by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and by X-ray diffraction (Figure
2b). Similar to 7, one of the boron-bound phenyl groups in 8 is
involved in stabilization of the PtIV center with a B1A-C31A
distance of 1.643(7) Å and Pt1A-C31A distance of 2.624(4) Å.
According to our DFT calculations, the Gibbs energy of isomer-
1
ization of 8 to 7 is -0.4 kcal/mol. No changes were seen in H
NMR spectra of 8 in both THF-d8 and DMSO-d6 after 5 days at
60 °C. We presume that the stability of phenylborato PtIV species
8 as well as 7 might be of kinetic origin, and solvent nucleophilicity
is not sufficient to decrease the reaction barrier noticeably.
TheviabilityofB-to-PtIV phenylgrouptransferinPt-dipyridylborate
systems was demonstrated in a reaction of Na[L’PtIIMe2] with O2
in i-PrOH solution leading to isopropoxo-bridged PtIVMe2Ph
complex 9 (Figure 2c) (eq 1).
Na[Ph2B(py)2]PtMe2 + 0.5O2 + 2i-PrOH f
PhB(py)2(µ-O-i-Pr)PtMe2Ph + NaO-i-Pr + H2O (1)
Strongly nucleophilic i-PrO- present in the reaction mixture might
contribute substantially in diminishing the activation barrier of the
overall B-to-PtIV phenyl group transfer.
In summary, we showed that phenyl group migration between
PtIV and B centers can occur in both directions and is accelerated
by Lewis bases. The prevailing product is determined by a stronger
donor group bridging Lewis acidic B and PtIV centers. In the case
of dimethylborato trimethyl PtIV complex 2 and the use of aprotic
weakly nucleophilic DMSO, methyl migration between PtIV and
B centers is reversible.
Figure 1. Transformation of 2-Pt-13C to 2-B-13C in DMSO-d6 solution at
60 °C: (a) plot of the 13C-enrichment of a boron-bound methyl group vs
time; (b) high-field region of 1H NMR spectrum of a mixture of 25% 2-Pt-
13C and 75% 2-B-13C with 195Pt and 13C satellites after 19 days. The
horizontal axis labels are in ppm; the peak labels are in Hertz.
Acknowledgment. We thank the University of Maryland and
the NSF (Grant CHE-0614798) for the financial support of this
work.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, CIF files
for 7, 8, and 9. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) (a) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2457–2483. (b) Hayashi,
H.; Yamasaki, K. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2829–2844.
(2) (a) Segnitz, A.; Kelly, E.; Taylor, S. H.; Maitlis, P. M. J. Organomet. Chem.
1977, 124, 113–123. (b) Albano, P.; Aresta, M.; Manassero, M. Inorg. Chem.
1980, 19, 1069–1072. (c) Siegmann, K.; Pregosin, P. S.; Venanzi, L. M.
Organometallics 1989, 8, 2659–2664. (d) Kobayashi, Y.; Ikeda, E. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1789–1790. (e) Ridgway, B. H.; Woerpel, K. A.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 458–460. (f) Pantcheva, I.; Nishihara, Y.; Osakada,
K. Organometallics 2005, 24, 3815–3817. (g) Pantcheva, I.; Osakada, K.
Organometallics 2006, 25, 1735–1741. (h) Suzaki, Y.; Osakada, K.
Organometallics 2006, 25, 3251–3258. (i) Zhao, P.; Incarvito, C. D.; Hartwig,
J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1876–1877, and references therein. (j)
Salem, H.; Shimon, L. J. W.; Leitus, G.; Weiner, L.; Milstein, D.
Organometallics 2008, 27, 2293–2299. (k) Xie, J.-H.; Nichols, J. M.; Lubek,
C.; Doyle, M. P. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2785–2788.
Figure 2. ORTEP drawings (50% probability ellipsoids) of complexes 7
(a), 8 (b), and 9 (c). Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
Complex 7 could be isolated from the solution in THF in pure
form in 89% yield and fully characterized including single crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 2a). The compound features a
phenyl group attached to B with the B1-C31 distance of 1.654(4)
Å. The B-bound phenyl ipso-carbon atom is involved in a weak
interaction with the PtIV with Pt1-C31 separation of 2.646(3) Å.
Interestingly, compared to the methyl group exchange between
B and PtIV in 2, a similar methyl for phenyl group exchange in 5
is more facile under same conditions. This behavior might stem
from weaker trans-influence of R ) phenyl versus methyl9 affecting
the relative kinetic accessibility of intermediate 6 and/or involve-
ment of the pyridyl dissociation mechanism in the subsequent
(3) For computational studies see: (a) Braga, A. A. C.; Ujaque, G.; Maseras, F.
Organometallics 2006, 25, 3647–3658, and references therein. (b) Braga,
A. A. C.; Morgon, N. H.; Ujaque, G.; Llidos, A.; Maseras, F. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2006, 691, 4459–4466.
(4) Khaskin, E.; Zavalij, P. Y.; Vedernikov, A. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 6309–6312.
(5) Miller, W. D.; Fray, A. H.; Quatroche, J. T.; Sturgill, C. D. Org. Process
Res. DeV. 2007, 11, 359–364.
(6) Khaskin, E.; Zavalij, P. Y.; Vedernikov, A. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 13054–5.
(7) The BMe2 fragment in 2-Pt-13C produces two signals in the 1H NMR
spectrum in THF-d8 at +0.14 ppm (BMeexo) and-0.91 ppm (agostic methyl
group, BMeendo, JPtH ) 58.1 Hz).
(8) See Supporting Information for details.
(9) Coe, B. J.; Glenwright, S. J. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 203, 5–80.
JA804222C
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 31, 2008 10089